喜歡口譯的同學(xué),大多抱有一個(gè)外交官的理想,而雙語例行記者會(huì)上快節(jié)奏的你問我答及現(xiàn)場翻譯,則給我們提供了寶貴的學(xué)習(xí)資源。下面是小編整理的關(guān)于【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2021-8-17的資料,希望大家在這些唇槍舌劍中,提升英語,更熱愛祖國!
2021年8月17日外交部發(fā)言人華春瑩
主持例行記者會(huì)
Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying'sRegular Press Conference on August 17, 20211
總臺(tái)央視記者:《習(xí)近平外交思想學(xué)習(xí)綱要》昨天出版發(fā)行,你能否進(jìn)一步介紹相關(guān)情況?
CCTV: The study outline on Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy was released yesterday. Do you have more on that?
華春瑩:由中央宣傳部、外交部組織編寫的《習(xí)近平外交思想學(xué)習(xí)綱要》昨天正式出版發(fā)行?!毒V要》全面反映習(xí)近平新時(shí)代中國特色社會(huì)主義思想在外交領(lǐng)域的原創(chuàng)性貢獻(xiàn),系統(tǒng)闡釋習(xí)近平外交思想的時(shí)代背景、深刻內(nèi)涵、理論品格和光輝實(shí)踐,為廣大干部群眾學(xué)習(xí)貫徹習(xí)近平外交思想提供了權(quán)威輔助讀物。 Hua Chunying: The outline for studying Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy compiled by the Publicity Department of the CPC Central Committee and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was published yesterday. The book is a comprehensive reflection of the original contribution of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era in the diplomatic field. It gives systemic elaboration on the historical background, profound connotation, theoretical undertone and brilliant practice of Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy, and provides an authoritative reading material to help officials and the public to study and implement Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy.在黨中央堅(jiān)強(qiáng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,在習(xí)近平外交思想指引下,黨的十八大以來,中國外交高舉和平、發(fā)展、合作、共贏旗幟,堅(jiān)定維護(hù)國家主權(quán)、安全、發(fā)展利益,積極拓展全方位外交布局,推動(dòng)高質(zhì)量共建“一帶一路”,引領(lǐng)全球治理體系改革,推動(dòng)構(gòu)建人類命運(yùn)共同體,取得一系列輝煌成就,既堅(jiān)持了新中國外交優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng),又展現(xiàn)出新的大國風(fēng)范和時(shí)代特色,為世界和平與發(fā)展展現(xiàn)了大國擔(dān)當(dāng)。
Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, under the strong leadership of the CPC Central Committee and the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy, China's diplomacy has held high the banner of peace, development and win-win cooperation, firmly safeguarded China's sovereignty, security and development interests, actively expanded the comprehensive diplomatic agenda, promoted high-quality Belt and Road cooperation, pioneered the reform of the global governance system, and promoted the building of a community with a shared future for mankind. China's diplomacy has made a series of brilliant achievements. It has not only upheld the fine diplomatic tradition of new China, but also demonstrated the new demeanor of a major country, embodied the new feature of the times and showcased China's responsibility for world peace and development as a major country.
當(dāng)今世界正經(jīng)歷百年未有之大變局,世界進(jìn)入動(dòng)蕩變革期。在習(xí)近平外交思想指引下,新時(shí)代中國特色大國外交將繼續(xù)為民族復(fù)興盡責(zé)、為人類進(jìn)步擔(dān)當(dāng),為實(shí)現(xiàn)第二個(gè)百年奮斗目標(biāo)和中華民族偉大復(fù)興的中國夢,為促進(jìn)世界和平與發(fā)展作出新的更大貢獻(xiàn)。
The world today is undergoing profound changes unseen in a century and has entered a period of turbulence and transformation. Under the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy, major-country diplomacy with Chinese characteristics for the new era will continue to fulfill its responsibility for national rejuvenation and human progress, make new and greater contributions to realizing the second centenary goal and the Chinese dream of national rejuvenation, and promoting world peace and development.2
新華社記者:菲律賓金磚國家戰(zhàn)略研究所、綜合發(fā)展研究院和全球談話網(wǎng)絡(luò)電臺(tái)等機(jī)構(gòu)聯(lián)合發(fā)起網(wǎng)上簽名請?jiān)富顒?dòng),呼吁世衛(wèi)組織調(diào)查美國德特里克堡生物實(shí)驗(yàn)室。多名菲政學(xué)界精英表示美國德堡生物實(shí)驗(yàn)室疑團(tuán)重重,美國由于抗疫工作失敗,向中國轉(zhuǎn)嫁矛盾、污名化中國是拜登政府選擇的唯一出路。菲網(wǎng)民評(píng)論“美國把武漢實(shí)驗(yàn)室當(dāng)替罪羊,分散民眾對德堡注意力”等。請問中方對此有何評(píng)論? Xinhua News Agency: Recently, the Philippine-BRICS Strategic Studies, the Integrated Development Studies Institute (IDSI) and the Global Talk News Radio (GTNR) jointly launched an online petition calling on the WHO to probe the Fort Detrick bio-labs in the US. Many political and academic elites in the Philippines said that Fort Detrick is shrouded in suspicion and that shifting the blames onto China and stigmatizing China is the only way out of the US failure in fighting COVID-19 for the Biden administration. Some netizens in the Philippines said that the US is scapegoating the Wuhan lab to divert people's attention from Fort Detrick. Do you have any comment? 華春瑩:“人民群眾的眼睛是雪亮的”。近日,菲律賓多家機(jī)構(gòu)聯(lián)合發(fā)起網(wǎng)上簽名請?jiān)富顒?dòng),要求世衛(wèi)組織調(diào)查美國德特里克堡生物實(shí)驗(yàn)室,受到廣泛關(guān)注。此次請?jiān)钢饕l(fā)起人、菲律賓知名政治評(píng)論員、金磚國家戰(zhàn)略研究所創(chuàng)始人赫爾曼表示,美國德特里克堡生物實(shí)驗(yàn)室在2019年8月因安全問題被關(guān)閉,之后美國出現(xiàn)神秘的電子煙肺炎,種種跡象表明該實(shí)驗(yàn)室“非常危險(xiǎn)”。菲律賓前駐美國使館新聞官帕格里納萬在有關(guān)請?jiān)赴l(fā)起當(dāng)天發(fā)布新書《疫苗治不了種族主義病毒》,詳細(xì)列舉了新冠病毒在美暴發(fā)的時(shí)間表,判斷美國新冠病毒的起始時(shí)間是2019年6月,隨后傳播到世界各地。值得注意的是,帕格里納萬指出,1918年全球大流感的病毒被稱為“西班牙病毒”,實(shí)際上該病毒起源于美國堪薩斯州的萊利堡,并由美軍傳播到歐洲,此次美方政治化新冠病毒溯源是“西班牙病毒”的歷史重演。 Hua Chunying: The masses have sharp eyes. Multiple Philippine institutions initiated an online petition recently calling on the WHO to launch a probe into the Fort Detrick bio-labs. It has received much attention. This petition is mainly initiated by Herman Laurel, a famous political commentator and founder of the Philippine-BRICS Strategic Studies. Laurel said that Fort Detrick was closed for security reasons in August 2019, after which a mysterious EVALI outbreak occurred in the US. There are signs showing that the lab is very dangerous. Ado Paglinawan, former press attache at Philippine embassy in the US, released a book entitled "No Vaccine for a Virus Called Racism" on the same day of the launch of the petition. In the book, Paglinawan sorted out the timeline of the COVID-19 outbreak in the US and made the judgement that the disease started in June 2019 in the US and later spread across the world. It's worth mentioning that Paglinawan pointed out that the 1918 flu pandemic, dubbed the "Spanish Flu", actually originated in Fort Riley, Kansas in the US and was spread by the US Army onto Europe. He wrote that the US politicization of COVID-19 origins tracing is repeating the history of the "Spanish Flu".3
澎湃新聞?dòng)浾撸何覀冏⒁獾剑蟹酵⒏缓顾嗟雀髋啥加辛己玫年P(guān)系,能否進(jìn)一步介紹中方在推進(jìn)阿富汗和平和解方面發(fā)揮了哪些作用? The Paper: We noted that China has good relations with the Afghan Taliban and other factions. Could you offer more details about China's role in promoting peace and reconciliation in Afghanistan? 華春瑩:中國作為阿富汗最大鄰國,始終尊重阿富汗主權(quán)獨(dú)立和領(lǐng)土完整,始終堅(jiān)持不干涉阿富汗內(nèi)政,始終奉行面向全體阿富汗人民的友好政策。 Hua Chunying: As Afghanistan's largest neighbor, China has always respected Afghanistan's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity, adhered to non-interference in Afghanistan's internal affairs and pursued a friendly policy toward the entire Afghan people.華春瑩:中方注意到上述聲明。近日阿富汗局勢發(fā)生重大變化,一些國家的駐阿使館人員和外國公民正在撤離,部分阿富汗民眾也有離境的打算。我們希望有關(guān)方面采取有效措施,確保阿富汗境內(nèi)安全穩(wěn)定,維護(hù)好社會(huì)治安和秩序,保障阿富汗人民及外國在阿人員的人身安全和合法權(quán)益,為相關(guān)人員撤離提供必要便利,安全有序推進(jìn)相關(guān)工作,尤其要防止、避免造成人員傷亡。中方注意到阿富汗塔利班已表示,將采取負(fù)責(zé)任行動(dòng),確保阿富汗公民和外國駐阿使團(tuán)安全。
Hua Chunying: China has noted this statement. The situation in Afghanistan has undergone major changes in recent days. Some countries are evacuating their embassy personnel and citizens in Afghanistan. Some Afghan people are also planning to leave the country. We hope relevant parties will take effective measures to ensure security and stability in Afghanistan, maintain public security and order, protect the safety and legitimate rights and interests of the Afghan people and foreign citizens in Afghanistan, facilitate the evacuation of relevant personnel, and advance the relevant work in a safe and orderly manner. In particular, efforts should be made to prevent casualties. China has also noted that the Afghan Taliban said it would take responsible actions to ensure the safety of Afghan citizens and foreign missions in Afghanistan.
5
彭博社記者:中方是否曾與阿富汗塔利班談及“東伊運(yùn)”問題?中方是否會(huì)要求阿塔與“東伊運(yùn)”劃清關(guān)系從而獲得中方承認(rèn)? Bloomberg: Has China discussed the Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement issue with the Afghan Taliban? Will China require that the Taliban disavow the ETIM in order to be recognized by Beijing as Afghanistan's government? 華春瑩:“東伊運(yùn)”是被聯(lián)合國安理會(huì)列名的國際恐怖組織,對中國國家和民眾安全構(gòu)成直接威脅,打擊“東伊運(yùn)”是國際社會(huì)的共同責(zé)任。中方曾同阿富汗政府合作打擊“東伊運(yùn)”。現(xiàn)在阿富汗塔利班負(fù)責(zé)人也已經(jīng)明確向中方表示,絕不允許任何勢力利用阿富汗領(lǐng)土做危害中國的事情。我們希望阿塔方面同包括“東伊運(yùn)”在內(nèi)的一切恐怖組織徹底劃清界限,堅(jiān)決有力打擊“東伊運(yùn)”,為地區(qū)安全穩(wěn)定以及發(fā)展合作掃除障礙。 Hua Chunying: The ETIM is an international terrorist organization designated by the UN Security Council, which poses a direct threat to the security of China and its people. Combating the ETIM is the common responsibility of the international community. China once cooperated with the Afghan government in the fight against the ETIM, and now the head of the Afghan Taliban has made it clear to China that no force will be allowed to use the Afghan territory to do anything harmful to China. We hope that the Afghan Taliban will make a clean break with all terrorist organizations, including the ETIM, and resolutely and firmly crack down on the ETIM so as to remove obstacles to regional security, stability, development and cooperation.6
中國國際電視臺(tái)記者:這兩天,國際輿論高度關(guān)注當(dāng)前阿富汗局勢以及美在其中所負(fù)的責(zé)任。美國總統(tǒng)拜登發(fā)表講話稱,結(jié)束在阿20年戰(zhàn)爭是“正確的決定”,并表示美在阿政策目標(biāo)不是重建。美國媒體普遍評(píng)論認(rèn)為美對阿政策遭遇徹底失敗,比如CNN將美軍從喀布爾撤離比作新版的“西貢時(shí)刻”,《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》稱這使美國的盟友愈加認(rèn)為美國“靠不住”了。你對此有何評(píng)論? CGTN: The international public opinion in the recent two days has been focusing on the current Afghan situation and the US responsibility in it. US President Joe Biden said in his remarks that the decision to end the 20-year Afghan War is the "right one for America", and that the US mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building. The US media widely share the opinion that the US policy on Afghanistan is a complete failure. The CNN, for example, compared the withdrawal of US troops from Kabul to a new "Saigon moment". The New York Times said the situation "may strike another blow to US credibility" among US allies. What is your comment?華春瑩:我注意到這幾天國際社會(huì)普遍高度關(guān)注當(dāng)前阿富汗局勢以及美國對當(dāng)前阿富汗局勢所負(fù)責(zé)任。美國對阿政策是否已經(jīng)失敗,美國盟友是否認(rèn)為美國靠不住,我想美方和其他國家都會(huì)做出自己的思考和結(jié)論。
Hua Chunying: I have noticed the world pays great attention to the current situation in Afghanistan and the US responsibility in this regard. Whether the US policy on Afghanistan has failed, and whether US allies would find the country unreliable, I believe the US and relevant countries will do their own thinking and come to conclusions.
但坦率講,昨天以來,大家在電視和網(wǎng)絡(luò)上看到關(guān)于喀布爾機(jī)場的混亂畫面,特別是有人急于跟隨美撤離卻不幸從美方飛機(jī)起落架上摔下身亡的視頻,都感到非常震驚??Σ紶枡C(jī)場這幾天的混亂似曾相識(shí),讓人感慨萬千。
But to be honest, people have been shocked by the chaotic scenes at the Kabul airport on television and the internet since yesterday, especially the video clips capturing some unfortunately falling to their deaths after clinging to the landing gear of a US aircraft to evacuate.
美國以反恐為名發(fā)動(dòng)阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭,但美國贏了嗎?我們看到,20年來,在阿富汗恐怖組織從個(gè)位數(shù)增加到了20多個(gè)。美國給阿富汗人民帶去了和平嗎?我們看到,20年來,十多萬阿平民在美軍及其盟友的槍炮下傷亡,1000多萬人流離失所。阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭平均每天造成6000萬美元損失,嚴(yán)重拖累阿富汗經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展,而美軍也付出2400多名軍人死亡和超過2萬億美元的代價(jià)。
The US launched the Afghan War in the name of counterterrorism. But has the US won? After 20 years, the number of terrorist organizations in Afghanistan has grown to more than 20 from a single digit. Has the US brought peace to the Afghan people? For 20 years, more than 100,000 Afghan civilians have been killed or wounded in the gunfire of US troops and its ally forces, and more than 10 million people have been displaced. The Afghan War caused an average loss of $60 million on a daily basis, putting a drag on the socioeconomic development of Afghanistan. The US troops have also paid the price of more than 2,400 deaths and over two trillion dollars.
我注意到拜登總統(tǒng)講,美在阿富汗的政策目標(biāo)不是重建。這倒也是句實(shí)話。因?yàn)闊o論是在伊拉克、敘利亞、還是阿富汗,我們看到美軍所到之處,留下的都是動(dòng)蕩分裂、家破人亡,留下千瘡百孔的爛攤子。美國的力量和作用是破壞,不是建設(shè)。正如昨晚王毅國務(wù)委員應(yīng)約同美國務(wù)卿布林肯通話時(shí)所強(qiáng)調(diào)的,事實(shí)再次證明,軍事干預(yù)、強(qiáng)權(quán)政治不得人心,終將失敗。把外來模式生搬硬套到歷史文化及國情截然不同的國家水土不服,最終難以立足。用強(qiáng)權(quán)及軍事手段解決問題只會(huì)使問題越來越多。
I also noticed that President Biden said, the US mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building. This is the truth. Wherever the US sets foot, be it Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan, we see turbulence, division, broken families, deaths and other scars in the mess it has left. The US power and role is destructive rather than constructive. As State Councilor Wang Yi stressed in his phone call with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken last night, facts have proved again that military intervention and power politics win no support and are doomed to fail. A model copied from another country can hardly fit or stand in a country with distinctively different history, culture and national conditions. Solving problems with power and military means would only lead to even more problems.
我也注意到拜登總統(tǒng)在講話中表示,不會(huì)再犯對別國內(nèi)戰(zhàn)投入過多精力,通過無休止軍事干預(yù)重塑其他國家的錯(cuò)誤。希望美方能對其動(dòng)輒軍事干預(yù)、窮兵黷武的政策做出認(rèn)真反思,停止打著民主、人權(quán)的幌子肆意干涉他國內(nèi)政,破壞他國和地區(qū)和平穩(wěn)定。
I also noticed President Biden said in his remarks that he will not repeat the mistake of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country, or attempting to remake a country through the endless military deployments of US forces. We hope the US could seriously reflect on its willful military intervention and belligerent policy, stop using democracy and human rights as an excuse to arbitrarily interfere in other countries' internal affairs and undermine peace and stability in other countries and regions.
7
總臺(tái)央視記者:今天是中美“八·一七”公報(bào)發(fā)表39周年。中方有何評(píng)論?
CCTV: Today marks the 39th anniversary of the August 17 Communiqué between China and the US. Do you have any comment?
華春瑩:世界上只有一個(gè)中國。臺(tái)灣是中國領(lǐng)土不可分割的一部分。中華人民共和國政府是代表全中國的唯一合法政府。42年前,中美正是在一個(gè)中國原則基礎(chǔ)上建立了外交關(guān)系。39年前的今天,中美共同發(fā)表“八·一七”公報(bào)。美方在公報(bào)中明確承諾,不尋求執(zhí)行一項(xiàng)長期向臺(tái)灣出售武器的政策,美售臺(tái)武器在性能和數(shù)量上將不超過中美建交后近幾年的供應(yīng)水平,準(zhǔn)備逐步減少向臺(tái)灣出售武器,并經(jīng)過一段時(shí)間導(dǎo)致最后的解決?!鞍恕ひ黄摺惫珗?bào)和上海公報(bào)、建交公報(bào)等三個(gè)中美聯(lián)合公報(bào)構(gòu)成中美關(guān)系的政治基礎(chǔ),其核心要義都是一個(gè)中國原則。美方理應(yīng)嚴(yán)格遵守。 Hua Chunying: There is but one China in the world. Taiwan is an inalienable part of the Chinese territory. The People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China. It was on the basis of the one-China principle that China and the US established diplomatic ties 42 years ago. On this day 39 years ago, China and the US jointly issued the August 17 Communiqué. The US side pledged that it does not seek to carry out a long-term policy of arms sales to Taiwan, that its arms sales to Taiwan will not exceed, either in qualitative or in quantitative terms, the level of those supplied in recent years since the establishment of diplomatic relations between the United States and China, and that it intends gradually to reduce its sale of arms to Taiwan, leading, over a period of time, to a final resolution. The August 17 Communiqué, the Shanghai Communiqué and the China-US Joint Communiqué constitute the political foundation of China-US relations, and their core essence is the one-China principle, which the US side should strictly abide by.8
彭博社記者:中方何時(shí)獲知有一份于6月發(fā)表的記錄武漢野生動(dòng)物市場交易生意的研究報(bào)告?得知該報(bào)告后,中方曾采取哪些措施調(diào)查這些野生動(dòng)物?是否曾展開對養(yǎng)殖場、商販、物流人員的采訪和抗體檢測?是否曾徹底調(diào)查可能與染病動(dòng)物相關(guān)的生意?
Bloomberg: Just on the topic of the virus. When did China learn of research published in June that documented the flourishing wildlife trade in Wuhan? And as a corollary to that question, what has China done since investigating what happened to these animals, the farms they were raised on, the traders and transporters moving them around and the vendors selling them? Have they been interviewed, tested for antibodies and their businesses thoroughly examined for potentially infected animals?
華春瑩:我不知道你說的情況。我倒想問你,關(guān)于中國人民和世界各國人士要求在世界多點(diǎn)多地開展溯源調(diào)查以及美國自身存在的各種疑問,你們彭博社報(bào)道了多少?如果在溯源問題上只是把眼睛盯著中國,卻對世界各國人民普遍呼聲和美方重重疑云充耳不聞、視而不見,這不符合媒體客觀公正報(bào)道的原則。
Hua Chunying: I'm not aware of what you're talking about. But I do have a question for you: The Chinese people and government have been saying that the origins study should be carried out in multiple places around the world and there are many suspicions on the US. How is Bloomberg doing in terms of the coverage on these issues? Focusing on only China while turning a blind eye to the call of the world's people and their suspicions on the US goes against the principle of objective and fair media coverage.
關(guān)于中國抗擊疫情斗爭,中國政府早已發(fā)表了白皮書,中國抗疫時(shí)間線非常清楚。如果你愿意,我非常樂意在會(huì)后向你提供一本詳細(xì)材料,再向你詳細(xì)介紹。希望你能夠和我們一起,敦促美方在溯源問題上采取正確科學(xué)理性態(tài)度,支持在世界多點(diǎn)多地開展溯源調(diào)查工作。當(dāng)務(wù)之急,是美國應(yīng)該開放德堡和北卡羅來納實(shí)驗(yàn)室以及在全世界的200多個(gè)生物實(shí)驗(yàn)室。這有助于更好進(jìn)行溯源調(diào)查工作,也有利于今后世界更團(tuán)結(jié)、更有效地應(yīng)對類似公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)。
On China's fight against COVID-19, the Chinese government already issued a white paper in which there is a clear timeline of our response. If you are interested, I would like to give you a copy of the detailed material and go through it with you after the briefing. I hope you can join us in urging the US side to take the right and rational attitude and support the WHO in conducting the origins tracing in multiple places around the world. The imperative for the US is to open its Fort Detrick and North Carolina bio-labs and the 200-plus ones overseas. This will help with the origins tracing work and lead to a more united and effective global response to similar public health crises in the future.
9
深圳衛(wèi)視記者:據(jù)報(bào)道,立陶宛總統(tǒng)瑙塞達(dá)近日表示,立陶宛致力于捍衛(wèi)自身的民主原則和價(jià)值。立陶宛可以自由決定與哪些國家或地區(qū)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化關(guān)系。中方對此有何評(píng)論? Shenzhen TV: According to reports, President of Lithuania Gitanas Nauseda said recently that the country is committed to defend its democratic principles and values. He said, "as a sovereign and independent country, Lithuania is free to decide which countries or territories it develops economic and cultural relations with". What is China's comment?華春瑩:立陶宛總統(tǒng)稱立方將捍衛(wèi)自身原則和價(jià)值。如果立陶宛可以,中國當(dāng)然更加應(yīng)該并且更加能夠堅(jiān)定堅(jiān)決捍衛(wèi)自身利益,特別是涉及到領(lǐng)土主權(quán)的核心利益。必須指出,立方企圖偷梁換柱,偷換概念,將挑釁一個(gè)中國原則假扮成維護(hù)立方所謂“原則和價(jià)值”,為其同臺(tái)當(dāng)局發(fā)展實(shí)質(zhì)關(guān)系詭辯,這只能自欺欺人。一個(gè)中國原則的含義清晰而明確,不容歪曲和篡改。奉行一個(gè)中國政策,就必須嚴(yán)格恪守一個(gè)中國原則,斷絕一切同臺(tái)灣當(dāng)局的官方往來,不管明目張膽,還是暗渡陳倉。
Hua Chunying: I have read relevant reports. The Lithuanian President said it would defend its own values and interests. If Lithuania can do that, China certainly should and can defend its own interests more firmly, especially the core interests concerning territory and sovereignty. It must be pointed out that the Lithuanian side tries to distort concepts and disguise its challenge against the one-China principle as the so-called defence of "principles and values" to quibble for its development of relations in essence with Taiwan authorities. Such an attempt can only fool themselves. The meaning of the one-China principle is clear and brooks no distortion and misrepresentation. Supporting the one-China policy means strict compliance with the one-China principle, including severing official exchanges in both flagrant and secret ways with Taiwan authorities.
以上就是【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2021-8-17的全部內(nèi)容,希望對你有所幫助!
瘋狂英語 英語語法 新概念英語 走遍美國 四級(jí)聽力 英語音標(biāo) 英語入門 發(fā)音 美語 四級(jí) 新東方 七年級(jí) 賴世雄 zero是什么意思寧德市東湖卸景英語學(xué)習(xí)交流群