【雙語】例行記者會 2021-3-31
喜歡口譯的同學(xué)，大多抱有一個外交官的理想，而雙語例行記者會上快節(jié)奏的你問我答及現(xiàn)場翻譯，則給我們提供了寶貴的學(xué)習(xí)資源。下面是小編整理的關(guān)于【雙語】例行記者會 2021-3-31的資料，希望大家在這些唇槍舌劍中，提升英語，更熱愛祖國！
2021年3月31日外交部發(fā)言人華春瑩主持例行記者會Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying'sRegular Press Conference on March 31, 2021
應(yīng)國務(wù)委員兼外交部長王毅邀請，韓國外交部長官鄭義溶將于4月2日至3日對中國進行訪問。
At the invitation of State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, ROK Foreign Minister Chung Eui-yong will visit China from April 2 to 3.
當前中韓關(guān)系發(fā)展良好。今明兩年是“中韓文化交流年”，明年是中韓建交30周年，兩國關(guān)系面臨進一步深化發(fā)展的重要機遇。中方愿同韓方共同努力，通過此訪落實兩國元首重要共識，增進戰(zhàn)略溝通，深化務(wù)實合作，推動中韓戰(zhàn)略合作伙伴關(guān)系不斷向前發(fā)展。
China-ROK relations enjoy sound development. China and the ROK will hold the "China-ROK Cultural Exchange Year" in 2021 and 2022, and next year marks the 30th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two countries. All this presents an important opportunity for deepening our bilateral relations. China is willing to work with the ROK through the visit to implement important consensus of the two heads of state, enhance strategic communication, deepen practical cooperation, and promote the continuous development of the China-ROK strategic cooperative partnership.
華春瑩：30日，美國國務(wù)院發(fā)布的《2020年國別人權(quán)報告》稱中國政府在新疆進行“種族滅絕”，并對中國的治疆政策妄加指責(zé)。今天上午，很多中國媒體向外交部發(fā)言人辦公室詢問中方立場。為了更好闡述清楚中方立場，我今天特意請我的同事犧牲了午飯和休息的時間，趕制了一個幻燈片。（開始放映幻燈片）
The US Department of State on March 30 released the "2020 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices", accusing the Chinese government of "genocide" in Xinjiang and wantonly criticizing China's Xinjiang policy. This morning, many Chinese media asked the Spokesperson's Office of the Foreign Ministry about China's position. In order to better expound China's position, I asked my colleagues to create the following slideshow during lunch and rest time. (The slide show begins)
所謂中國“滅絕種族”是違反國際法的彌天大謊。滅絕種族罪是公認的嚴重國際罪行。這一概念的誕生與二戰(zhàn)密切相關(guān)，用來形容“對一個民族或一個種族團體的毀滅”。1948年12月，聯(lián)合國大會通過“防止及懲治滅絕種族罪公約”，明確規(guī)定了滅絕種族罪的定義。根據(jù)公約，滅絕種族是指為了“全部或部分消滅特定團體”而實施的暴行。在客觀方面，必須要證明行為人實施了公約規(guī)定的有關(guān)行為，這是認定滅絕種族罪的最基本的要求，相關(guān)證據(jù)和有關(guān)要素必須要求“高程度的證明”和“完全的肯定”。在主觀方面，必須要求“全部或部分消滅特定團體”的特定意圖，這是認定滅絕種族罪的關(guān)鍵要素，對特定意圖的認定必須是具體和明確無誤的。因此，對滅絕種族罪的認定需要經(jīng)過權(quán)威、嚴格的法律程序，要經(jīng)得起事實和歷史的檢驗。任何國家、組織和個人都沒有資格和權(quán)力隨意認定別國犯有“滅絕種族罪”。在國際關(guān)系中，任何國家都不能將這個罪名用作信口開河、惡意操弄的政治標簽。
Accusing China of "genocide" is the biggest lie of all that rides roughshod over international law. The term genocide, which is universally believed to be a severe international crime, came into being against the backdrop of World War II to recount "the destruction of a nation or of an ethnic group." In December 1948, the UN General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which defined the crime of genocide as acts "committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". In terms of the act, it must be proven that there was the commission of specific acts under the Convention. This is the most elementary requirement for a finding of genocide. The key elements must be proved at a "high level of certainty" and the Court must "be fully convinced" of the allegation. In terms of the intent, it must be proven that there was a specific intent to destroy "in whole or in part" a particular group. This is a critical element for a finding of genocide. The specific intent must be specifically and clearly demonstrated and proven. Therefore, a finding of genocide must result from the application of authoritative, stern, inflexible procedural rules. It must survive a strict scrutiny of the facts and withstand the test of time. No State, organization, or individual is qualified and entitled to arbitrarily determine that another country has committed "genocide". In international relations, no country should use this accusation as a political label for rumor-mongering and malicious manipulation.
美方基于個別反華勢力的謊言和虛假信息，妄自斷言中國新疆存在“種族滅絕”，這是荒謬至極的世紀謊言，是對中國人民的極大侮辱和侵犯，也是對國際法和國際關(guān)系基本準則的嚴重踐踏。
The US, based on lies and disinformation produced by a handful of anti-China forces, wantonly asserted that there is genocide in Xinjiang. This is the most preposterous lie of the century, an outrageous insult and affront to the Chinese people, and a gross breach of international law and basic norms governing international relations.
大量事實早已證明，美方不斷援引炒作的所謂調(diào)查報告是反華極端分子鄭國恩之流炮制編造的虛假信息，幾個所謂的“證人”只不過是被他們利用培訓(xùn)出來的“演員”，而相關(guān)媒體則居中扮演了“擴音器”和謊言傳播機的作用。他們的拙劣表演漏洞百出，對此，不僅中國新疆方面而且很多包括美國在內(nèi)的外國人士都已通過各種方式予以揭露和批駁。
As overwhelming facts have proven, the investigative report the US keeps citing and hyping up is disinformation fabricated by the likes of Adrian Zenz who are anti-China. The few so-called "witnesses" are just "actors" and "actresses" the US has used and trained. Relevant media acted as the megaphone to spread the lies. Their shoddy show is a deplorable patchwork. Xinjiang and many outside China, including in the US, have exposed and refuted their lies in various ways.
所謂“滅絕種族”是對中國民族政策的污蔑、對新疆發(fā)展成就的污蔑。中國是統(tǒng)一的多民族國家，根據(jù)中國憲法和民族區(qū)域自治法，各少數(shù)民族的合法權(quán)利和權(quán)益得到充分保護，各民族的平等、團結(jié)、互助、和諧關(guān)系得到有效維護。可以毫不夸張地說，中國的少數(shù)民族政策比美國的好得多、公平得多，在中國的少數(shù)民族比在美國的少數(shù)族裔幸福、平等、有尊嚴得多。美方一而再、再而三地編造一個又一個謊言，甚至編造出諸如“滅絕種族”、“強迫勞動”這樣的彌天大謊，實在是荒謬至極！中國一直對少數(shù)民族實行寬于漢族的生育政策，少數(shù)民族人口的增長速度一直高于全國平均水平，過去40多年來，新疆維吾爾族人口從555萬人上升至1280萬人，人均預(yù)期壽命從60年前的30歲提高到72歲。有人見過這樣的“種族滅絕”嗎？為滿足群眾脫貧就業(yè)愿望，新疆各級政府在充分尊重本人意愿基礎(chǔ)上，幫助群眾到外省市就業(yè)，過上更高收入的好生活，有人見過這樣的“種族滅絕”嗎？新疆棉花大多實現(xiàn)了機械化采摘，成熟季節(jié)河南、四川等地農(nóng)民工也會去新疆采棉，這同美國人跨州就業(yè)、歐洲一些國家民眾秋季到葡萄園打工采摘有什么不同？
The genocide allegation maligns China's ethnic policy and Xinjiang's development and progress. China is a unified multi-ethnic country where the rights and interests of all ethnic minority groups are fully protected according to the Constitution and the regional ethnic autonomy arrangement. All ethnic groups live harmoniously together with equality, solidarity and mutual assistance. We can say without exaggeration that China's policy on ethnic minorities is much better and more equal than that of the US. Ethnic minorities in China enjoy much greater happiness, equality and dignity than those in the US. It is just beyond absurd for the US to keep churning out lies and weaving utterly groundless stories of "forced labor" and "genocide"! China's family planning policy has been more leniently applied to ethnic minorities than the ethnic Han people, leading to higher growth rate in ethnic minority populations compared with the national average. During the past 40 years or so, the population of Uyghurs in Xinjiang increased from 5.55 million to 12.8 million. Their life expectancy rose from 30 years six decades ago to 72. Has anyone seen this kind of "genocide"? To help residents shake off poverty through employment, Xinjiang government at all levels have been assisting them in finding jobs outside the region on the basis of fully respecting their will. As a result, people are leading better lives with higher incomes. Has anyone seen this kind of "genocide"? In Xinjiang, most cotton is now harvested mechanically. During the cotton-picking season, migrant rural workers from Henan and Sichuan would travel to Xinjiang for the job. This is no different from Americans seeking cross-state employment or Europeans working in autumn vineyards.
美國作為一個大國，無視新疆安全繁榮發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實和2500萬各族群眾團結(jié)和睦的事實，僅僅依據(jù)幾個所謂偽學(xué)者偽證人的說法就隨意給中國扣上“種族滅絕”的帽子，只能更加戳穿美方所謂講法治規(guī)則的虛偽面目，只能更加證明美方企圖制造所謂新疆問題來阻遏中國發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略陰謀。正像當年親自參與策動伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭的美國前國務(wù)卿鮑威爾辦公室主任威爾克森親口承認的那樣，所謂新疆維吾爾族問題，只不過是美國企圖從內(nèi)部長期搞亂中國、遏制中國的戰(zhàn)略陰謀。這種手法同當年美及其幾個盟友對伊拉克、敘利亞所作所為如出一轍，但絕不可能在中國得逞。
As a major power, the US has turned a blind eye to the fact that Xinjiang enjoys security, prosperity and development, and that the 25 million residents of all ethnic groups in the region live harmoniously together with solidarity, and arbitrarily slapped the label of "genocide" on China based on nothing but the accounts of a few fake academics and false witnesses. This only exposes further its hypocrisy behind all the talk about rule of law and rules, and serves as further evidence that the US strategic conspiracy is attempting to create a so-called Xinjiang issue to contain China's development. Lawrence Wilkerson, who helped wage war in Iraq and worked as chief of staff to former Secretary of State Colin Powell, has made it clear the so-called Xinjiang issue is nothing but a US strategic conspiracy to foment unrest in China and contain it from within. This is what the US and a few of its allies did to Iraq and Syria. But it will not and shall not work in China.
美國現(xiàn)在對中國新疆窮兇極惡、氣急敗壞胡亂進行的指責(zé)和亂扣的帽子，事實上都是他們自己犯過的罪、做過的惡，都是他們自己罪惡的反射。
The vicious, waspish, and wanton accusations and insults that the US flings at Xinjiang are, in fact, a reflection of its own crimes and sins committed in the past.
且不說美國歷史上通過“西進運動”對印第安人進行的種族屠殺和滅絕，他們販賣和奴役黑人犯下的罪惡；且不說“911”后美國以反恐為名對穆斯林國家大打出手，以所謂“洗衣粉”和擺拍視頻作為證據(jù)對別的主權(quán)國家悍然發(fā)動軍事侵略，造成幾十萬無辜平民傷亡，幾千萬穆斯林家破人亡；且不說美方在關(guān)塔那摩監(jiān)獄和阿布格萊布監(jiān)獄犯下的虐囚罪行。就在這兩天，《華盛頓郵報》刊登“美國原住民歷史：天花疫苗與驅(qū)逐家園”的報道，對美國政府長期以來針對印第安原住民的謊言與惡行進行了回溯，包括故意將帶有天花病毒的毛毯贈給缺乏免疫能力的原住民，導(dǎo)致其人口銳減，包括幾千名原住民年輕女子在不知情的情況下被美政府實施絕育手術(shù)。還有近日不斷曝光出來的美墨邊境被拘押非法移民包括大量兒童的慘狀和非人道待遇，一樁樁、一件件，可謂觸目驚心。今年聯(lián)合國人權(quán)理事會審議美國國別人權(quán)報告時，有110多個國家對美國人權(quán)問題提出了批評，要求美國切實解決自身存在的歧視少數(shù)群體等系統(tǒng)性問題。
Speaking of the US, there was genocide of native Indians through the Westward Expansion and the sins of trading enslaved black people. Then, the US launched military operations against Muslim countries under the pretext of counter-terrorism following the 9/11 attack. It used a test tube of washing powder and a staged video as evidence to stage wars against sovereign states, causing numerous civilian casualties and the destruction of countless Muslim families. And you all remember the Guantanamo Bay detention camp which is infamous for the US abusive treatment of prisoners. More recently, Washington Post carried an article titled "How Native Americans were vaccinated against smallpox, then pushed off their land". The article gave an account of the lies that US government has long told to native Indians and the sinful deeds it conducted against them, such as distribution of blankets infected with smallpox with the purpose of killing American Indians, and uninformed sterilization of thousands of native Indian women. The past couple of days witnessed widespread coverage of the inhuman treatment of illegal immigrants, many children included, at detention center at the US-Mexico border. We also noticed that when the Human Rights Council was reviewing the report on the US, over 110 countries criticized the US on its human rights issues, asking the US to take concrete measures to solve systemic problems such as poverty and discrimination against minority groups.
美國根本沒有資格指責(zé)中國的人權(quán)問題，他們自編自導(dǎo)自演的這出戲該收場了，美國政客該從自己“楚門的世界”里清醒過來了！
The US has no right whatsoever to criticize China on human rights issue. Let the curtain fall on this US-staged play. It's time for US politicians to wake up from their Truman Show.
１
總臺央視記者：昨天，全國人大常委會審議通過了香港基本法附件一和附件二修訂案。英美等國稱此舉破壞香港民主，損害港人自由，違反《中英聯(lián)合聲明》，違背中方國際義務(wù)。中方對此有何評論？
CCTV: Yesterday, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress deliberated on and adopted the amendments to Annex I and II to the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR. Some countries including the UK and US have accused this move as a breach of the Sino-British Joint Declaration, undermining Hong Kong's democracy and the freedoms of the Hong Kong residents,and breaking China's international obligations. What is China's comment?
華春瑩：昨天，十三屆全國人大常委會第二十七次會議審議通過了香港特區(qū)基本法附件一、附件二修訂案。這為全面準確貫徹“一國兩制”方針、落實“愛國者治港”原則、確保香港長治久安提供了堅實的制度保障，充分反映了包括香港同胞在內(nèi)的全體中國人民的共同意愿。昨天，全國人大常委會法工委、國務(wù)院港澳辦負責(zé)人已介紹了相關(guān)情況，香港中聯(lián)辦也發(fā)表了聲明，表明了有關(guān)立場。我想再強調(diào)以下幾點：Hua Chunying: Yesterday, the 27th Session of the 13th NPC Standing Committee adopted the amendments to Annex I and Annex II of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong SAR. It will provide strong institutional safeguards for the full and faithful implementation of the policy of One Country, Two Systems and the principle of "patriots administering Hong Kong", and ensure the stability of Hong Kong in the long run. It embodies the common aspiration of the Chinese people, including the Hong Kong compatriots. Yesterday, the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee, the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council gave briefings, and the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in Hong Kong SAR issued a statement to make clear China's position. I would like to underscore the following points:
一、英美等國質(zhì)疑“愛國者治港”原則，實際上“愛國者治理”原則早已是世界各國通行的做法。美英等國在自己的法律中早已對愛國、忠誠確定了嚴格標準，特別是對公職人員忠于國家的操守作出了明確要求。例如，美國法律規(guī)定，政府工作人員基本責(zé)任一般原則的第一項即忠于美國憲法和法律；任何人如支持推翻美國憲制和政府，或參與針對美政府的罷工，或參與從事相關(guān)活動的組織，不得在美國政府內(nèi)任職。美國刑法明確規(guī)定，犯有暴亂、叛國等罪行的人不得擔(dān)任公職。美國國會參眾兩院還設(shè)有獨立的道德委員會，專門負責(zé)監(jiān)督和調(diào)查議員是否有不忠于聯(lián)邦等行為。美國歷史上，有18名國會議員因不忠于聯(lián)邦被取消議員資格。
First, The UK and the US questioned the principle of "patriots administering Hong Kong". But in fact, the principle of "patriots-administering" has long been a common practice around the world. The US, the UK and some other countries have long established strict standards of patriotism and loyalty in their laws, especially explicit requirements for public officials to be loyal to the state. For example, the law of the United States clearly defines the the basic obligation of public service, and the first of its general principles is to pledge loyalty to the US Constitution and laws. Anyone shall not be allowed to serve in the US government if he/she advocates the overthrow of the constitutional form of government, or participates in a strike against the US government, or participates in an organization that engages in such activities. The US Constitution and criminal law also clearly stipulate that people who commit crimes such as rioting and treason shall be incapable of holding any office in the United States. Both the House and the Senate of the US Congress have independent ethics committees, which are responsible for monitoring and investigating whether members of Congress have committed acts of disloyalty to the United States. In US history, 18 members of Congress have been expelled for disloyalty to the country.
英國制定了《1351年叛逆法》《1848年叛逆重罪法》《1989年官方機密法》等維護國家安全的法律，用以打擊分裂國家、顛覆國家政權(quán)、勾結(jié)外部勢力、泄露國家機密等罪行，確保民眾效忠國家，維護國家安全。這些法律同樣適用于公職人員。
To crack down on crimes such as secession, subversion, collusion with external forces, and disclosure of national secrets, and to ensure people's loyalty to the country and safeguard national security, Britain enacted a set of acts including the Treason Act 1351, the Treason Felony Act 1848, and the Official Secrets Act 1989. These acts apply equally to public servants.
美國聯(lián)邦政府承擔(dān)完善選舉制度的責(zé)任，通過具體選舉規(guī)則確保當選的是“愛國者”。英國作為單一制國家，其治下各地選舉制度均由中央政府決定。同時，美英均有數(shù)量龐大的選舉制度立法。僅近兩年，美國會議員就提出了40多項關(guān)于完善選舉制度的法案。就在中國全國人大公布完善香港特區(qū)選舉制度議程的同一天（美東時間3月3日晚），美國會眾議院還通過了一項關(guān)于完善選舉制度、提高選舉安全的“為了人民法案”。英國中央政府制定了超過200件涉及選舉的法律、命令、規(guī)則等，對英格蘭、蘇格蘭、威爾士、北愛爾蘭的議員、市長、警察等選舉作出規(guī)定。
The US federal government is in charge of the improvements of the country's electoral system. With specific election rules, it ensures that only the "patriots" could be elected. In the UK, a unitary country, the electoral system of each region is decided by the central government of Britain. Both the US and UK have a large number of electoral legislations. In the past two years, members of US Congress have introduced more than 40 bills to improve the electoral system. On the same day (March 3 EST) when China's top legislature announced its agenda for improving Hong Kong's electoral system, the US House of Representatives passed a "For the People Act" to improve the electoral system and ensure election security. Britain has enacted more than 200 acts, orders, and rules relating to the election of members of Parliament, mayors, police and crime commissioners in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
二、英方指責(zé)中方違反《中英聯(lián)合聲明》，損害香港民主自由，違背中方國際義務(wù)，這完全是罔顧事實，顛倒黑白。中國政府管治香港的依據(jù)是中國憲法和香港基本法，而不是《中英聯(lián)合聲明》?！堵?lián)合聲明》的核心要義是確保中國恢復(fù)對香港行使主權(quán)。英方對回歸后的香港沒有監(jiān)督權(quán)和所謂道義責(zé)任，沒有任何資格和法理依據(jù)干預(yù)香港事務(wù)。英國對香港150多年殖民統(tǒng)治中，沒有給過香港任何民主自由。歷任港督都由英國委任，港英時期的《公安條例》和《社團條例》對集會、游行、結(jié)社加以嚴格限制，港人沒有上街抗議示威的自由。
Second, it is groundless and fact-distorting for the UK side to accuse China of violating the Sino-British Joint Statement, undermining Hong Kong's democracy and freedom and breaking China's international obligations. The legal basis for the Chinese government's administration of Hong Kong is China's Constitution and the Basic Law, not the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The core essence of the Joint Declaration is to ensure China's resumption of the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong. The UK has no right of supervision over Hong Kong after its return, or so-called moral responsibility. It is in no position and has no legal basis to interfere in Hong Kong affairs. During the 150-plus years of colonial rule by the UK, Hong Kong was never given any democracy or freedom. All the governors of Hong Kong were appointed by the UK. Both the Public Order Ordinance and the Societies Ordinance during the British rule imposed draconian restrictions on assembly, procession and association, and Hong Kong people had no freedom to protest and demonstrate on the streets.
中國中央政府才是香港民主維護者和促進者。回歸之后，香港同胞才真正開始當家作主。中央政府始終堅持在憲法和基本法軌道上循序漸進推進符合香港實際情況的民主制度，并為此付出巨大努力。2014年8月，全國人大常委會作出決定，進一步規(guī)定香港特區(qū)行政長官和立法會實行普選的路線圖、時間表。正是反中亂港勢力刻意阻撓破壞，否決了普選方案，導(dǎo)致行政長官和立法會普選目標無法實現(xiàn)。2019年的“修例風(fēng)波”中，反中亂港分子更是明目張膽同外部勢力勾結(jié)，企圖里應(yīng)外合策動“顏色革命”。他們在西方公開或暗中支持縱容下從事極端暴力犯罪活動，打砸搶燒，用殺傷性兇器襲擊警察，對普通市民擅用“私刑”，甚至當街縱火燒人。有的密會外國駐港外交官，揮舞英美國旗，請求美軍登陸香港。這些活動嚴重損害香港憲制秩序和法治秩序，嚴重危害國家主權(quán)、安全、發(fā)展利益和香港繁榮穩(wěn)定。任何一個主權(quán)國家對此都絕對不能容忍。這次全國人大修改完善香港選舉制度，恰恰體現(xiàn)了中央堅持和完善“一國兩制”制度體系、維護香港長期繁榮穩(wěn)定的良苦用心和歷史擔(dān)當，將更好體現(xiàn)香港居民廣泛、均衡的政治參與，更好兼顧社會各階層、各界別、各方面的利益，有利于提高特區(qū)治理效能，為最終實現(xiàn)普選打下良好基礎(chǔ)。這才是香港居民真正應(yīng)該享有的民主，這才是真正有利于維護香港根本利益的長遠大計。
In fact, it is the central government of China that has been upholding and promoting democracy in Hong Kong. It was after the return of Hong Kong to the motherland that Hong Kong compatriots really began to take charge of their own affairs. The central government has been committed to promoting Hong Kong's democracy within constitutional and legal framework, and has made tremendous efforts to this end. In August 2014, the NPC Standing Committee further stipulated the roadmap and timetable for selecting the HKSAR's chief executive and forming LegCo through universal suffrage. Unfortunately, the anti-China destabilizing forces in Hong Kong intentionally disrupted the procedure and vetoed the proposal. As a result, the aim of selecting the chief executive and forming LegCo through universal suffrage was hence beyond reach. During Hong Kong's turbulence over the proposed amendment bill in 2019, anti-China rioters in Hong Kong blatantly colluded with external forces in an attempt to instigate a "color revolution". With the open or covert support of the West, the rioters engaged in extremely violent criminal activities, vandalizing, looting, attacking police officers with lethal weapons, lynching innocent citizens and setting people on fire in the streets. Some secretly met with foreign diplomats stationed in Hong Kong; some waved the flags of the US and the UK, and some asked the American troops to land on Hong Kong. These activities have seriously undermined Hong Kong's constitutional and legal order, and jeopardized China's sovereignty, security, development interests and Hong Kong's prosperity and stability. No sovereign country would ever tolerate anything like this. The move to improve the electoral system of the Hong Kong SAR by the National People's Congress embodies, more than anything, the good intention and sense of responsibility of the central government to uphold and improve policy of One Country, Two Systems, and safeguard the long-term prosperity and stability of Hong Kong. It will better ensure extensive and balanced political participation of Hong Kong residents, serve the interests of all social strata, all sectors and all parties of Hong Kong society, help improve the governance efficacy of the Hong Kong SAR, and lay good foundation for eventual realization of universal suffrage. This is the kind of democracy that the Hong Kong people truly deserve, and this is the long-term plan that will truly safeguard the fundamental interests of Hong Kong.
至于中方的義務(wù)，中國政府的首要責(zé)任和義務(wù)，是確保包括香港特別行政區(qū)在內(nèi)的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)和安全，確保外部勢力及其政治代理人無法隨意在香港策動“顏色革命”、危害香港安全穩(wěn)定和發(fā)展繁榮，確保香港管治者真正服務(wù)于香港同胞的利益和福祉。
As for China's obligations, the primary responsibility and obligation of the Chinese government is to ensure sovereignty and security of China's territory, including that of the Hong Kong SAR. It is to ensure that no external forces and their political agents will be able to easily instigate "color revolution" to endanger the security, stability and the development of Hong Kong. It's also to ensure that Hong Kong governance can truly serve the interests and well-being of Hong Kong compatriots.
我還想指出，美國和英國的議員是美國選民和英國選民選的，他們無權(quán)干涉別國內(nèi)政。這些議員應(yīng)該多為他們的選民干實事。英美國內(nèi)疫情這么重，這么多人喪生，又有這么多人吸毒成癮，無家可歸，流落街頭，種族主義、社會不公現(xiàn)象日益嚴重，這些議員干什么了？他們真正該做的，是傾聽本國民眾呼聲，關(guān)心本國民眾福祉，管理好本國的事。
I also want to point out that those American and British legislators are elected by their constituents in the US and UK. They have no right to interfere in other countries' internal affairs. These legislators should do something to deliver real benefits to their constituents. What on earth have those legislators done when COVID-19 is still rampant in the US and UK and so many people are dying? What have those legislators done with drug addicts and homeless people in the streets of their constituencies? What have those legislators done about racism and social injustice? What they should really do is to heed the voice of their own people and turn their attention to their own people's well-being and their domestic affairs.
最后，我要強調(diào)，香港是中國的香港，香港事務(wù)純屬中國內(nèi)政。中國政府有決心、有信心維護好國家主權(quán)、安全、發(fā)展利益和香港繁榮穩(wěn)定，有決心、有信心繼續(xù)貫徹好“一國兩制”、“港人治港”、高度自治。任何外部勢力都不要圖謀插手香港事務(wù)、進而對華施壓，否則必將遭到可恥的失敗。
Finally, I would like to stress that Hong Kong is China's Special Administrative Region and its affairs are an integral part of China's internal affairs. The Chinese government has the resolve and confidence to safeguard the sovereignty, security and development interests of the country and the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong. It has the resolve and confidence to ensure the continued success of the policy of One Country, Two Systems, under which the people of Hong Kong administer Hong Kong with a high degree of autonomy. Any attempt to meddle in Hong Kong affairs and impose pressure on China is doomed to fail.
Hua Chunying: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine jointly held the online and offline "Forum on Traditional Chinese Medicine and International Cooperation to Fight Against COVID-19 Pandemic" on March 30. Political leaders and government officials from 28 countries and regions including President of Zimbabwe Mnangagwa and Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine Stefanishyna, WHO representatives and experts had in-depth exchanges through video link.
孫春蘭副總理在開幕式致辭表示，中醫(yī)藥是中華民族的瑰寶。在這次抗擊新冠肺炎疫情中，中醫(yī)藥全程深度參與，與西醫(yī)藥一起形成了中國特色的八版診療方案，成功推出“三藥三方”等一批有效中藥，療效得到實踐檢驗。中國毫無保留同各方分享中醫(yī)藥防控救治經(jīng)驗，愿與各國一道，繼續(xù)在中醫(yī)藥基礎(chǔ)理論、臨床療效、國際標準等方面深化合作，促進傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)和現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)優(yōu)勢互補、交流互鑒，更好服務(wù)人類的健康和福祉。
Sun Chunlan, Vice Premier of the State Council said in her opening address that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a jewel of the Chinese people. Throughout the fight against COVID-19, TCM has all along played an active role. The eight editions of Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for COVID-19 Patients with Chinese characteristics were formulated by combining TCM with Western medicine. The efficacy of TCM products including the well-know three drugs and three formulas have been proven through practice. China has also been sharing its experience in using TCM for prevention, control and treatment without reservation. We stand ready to work with all countries to deepen cooperation in TCM basic theory, clinical efficacy and international standard, and to enable traditional medicine and modern medicine to interact and draw upon each other's strength, so as to better serve the health and welfare of all humanity.
論壇達成了三大成果，一是通過了《支持中醫(yī)藥參與全球疫情防控倡議》。倡議提出，繼續(xù)堅持多邊主義，共同應(yīng)對疫情；繼續(xù)開展經(jīng)驗總結(jié)，予以推廣和應(yīng)用；繼續(xù)運用傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)，護佑民眾健康；繼續(xù)加強國際合作，發(fā)展傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)藥。二是廣泛宣介了中醫(yī)藥在治療新冠肺炎中的獨特作用。13個參會國家部長級官員及香港、澳門特別行政區(qū)政府有關(guān)部門負責(zé)人分別介紹各國和本地區(qū)在抗擊新冠肺炎疫情過程中積極發(fā)揮以中醫(yī)藥為代表的傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)作用、特色和優(yōu)勢的情況。三是為促進與會國傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)應(yīng)對新冠肺炎疫情方面合作奠定基礎(chǔ)。參會官員和專家對于進一步加強團結(jié)、推動各國在傳統(tǒng)醫(yī)學(xué)領(lǐng)域合作達成共識。我想本次論壇對我們下一步繼續(xù)合作應(yīng)對新冠肺炎疫情具有積極意義。
The forum delivered three outcomes. First, it adopted the Initiative on Supporting the Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Global Fight Against COVID-19. The initiative called for renewed commitment to multilateralism to jointly deal with the pandemic, to take stock of and promote wider adoption of good practice, to continue applying traditional medicine to safeguard people's health, and to enhance international cooperation for the development of traditional medicine. Second, the forum paid tribute to the unique role played by TCM in treating COVID-19 cases. Ministerial officials of 13 participating countries and officials from relevant departments of the Hong Kong and Macao SAR governments shared how they leveraged the role, characteristics and advantages of traditional medicine with TCM as a representative. Third, the forum laid the groundwork for cooperation among participating countries in fighting COVID-19 with traditional medicine. The officials and experts agreed to strengthen solidarity and promote cooperation in traditional medicine. The forum is of positive significance for our continued fight against COVID-19.
3
彭博社記者：兩個問題。第一，世衛(wèi)組織總干事稱，聯(lián)合專家組報告在得出新冠病毒最有可能經(jīng)中間宿主從蝙蝠傳人的結(jié)論之前，并未充分分析實驗室泄露的可能性。昨天，總干事在對成員國吹風(fēng)會上表示，可能還需派出更多專家組。外交部對此有何評論？第二個問題，BBC駐華記者沙磊在其涉華報道受到大量批評后，已經(jīng)離開這里去了臺灣。外交部對此有何評論？
Bloomberg: I have two questions. First, WHO's Director General has said the virus probe didn't adequately analyze the possibility of a lab accident before deciding that it's most likely the pathogen spread from bats to humans via another animal. In a briefing to member countries yesterday he said he is ready to deploy additional missions involving specialist experts. Does the foreign ministry have a comment on this? My second question is, the BBC correspondent John Sudworth has relocated to Taiwan after receiving a fair amount of criticism in China for his coverage here. Does the foreign ministry have a comment on that?
華春瑩：首先回答你的第一個問題，關(guān)于世衛(wèi)組織發(fā)布新冠病毒溯源研究報告，中方已經(jīng)表明了立場。我們對參與此次溯源合作的中外專家展現(xiàn)出的科學(xué)、勤勉、專業(yè)精神表示贊賞。
Hua Chunying: On your first question, the Chinese side has made clear its position on the origin-tracing study report released by WHO. China has taken note of the report released by WHO. We commend the Chinese and international experts who have taken part in this joint study for their commitment to science, tireless industry and professionalism.
中方始終支持各國科學(xué)家開展病毒源頭和傳播途徑的全球科學(xué)研究，參與共提了世衛(wèi)大會涉新冠肺炎決議，支持世衛(wèi)組織主導(dǎo)下各成員國就病毒動物源頭研究開展合作。中方在國內(nèi)疫情防控任務(wù)十分繁重情況下，兩次邀請世衛(wèi)專家來華開展溯源研究。中方為專家組在武漢的順利工作提供了必要協(xié)助，充分體現(xiàn)了中方開放、透明、負責(zé)任的態(tài)度。
China has always been a supporter for global scientific research on the source of the virus and its transmission routes. We co-sponsored the WHA resolution on COVID-19 and support WHO-led cooperation on zoonotic source research among member states. Despite the daunting task of domestic prevention and control, China twice invited WHO experts in for study of origins. The Chinese side offered necessary facilitation for the team's work, fully demonstrating its openness, transparency and responsible attitude.
溯源是科學(xué)問題，應(yīng)該由全球科學(xué)家合作開展有關(guān)工作。將溯源問題政治化的行徑只會嚴重阻礙全球溯源合作，破壞全球抗疫努力，導(dǎo)致更多的生命損失。這同國際社會團結(jié)抗疫的愿望背道而馳。
Study of origins is a matter of science, which should be jointly conducted by scientists all over the world. To politicize this issue will only severely hinder global cooperation in study of origins, jeopardize anti-pandemic cooperation, and cost more lives. It would run counter to the international community's aspiration for solidarity against the virus.
溯源也是一項全球性任務(wù)，應(yīng)該在多國多地開展。我們相信，世衛(wèi)組織和中國的這次聯(lián)合研究將對全球溯源合作起到良好的促進作用。
Study of origins is also a global mission that should be conducted in multiple countries and localities. We believe the joint WHO-China study will effectively stimulate global cooperation in origin-tracing.
具體到你說譚德塞總干事表示，實驗室泄露的可能性還不能完全排除，需要開展進一步研究，我想說的是，在此次中國—世衛(wèi)組織聯(lián)合溯源科學(xué)研究中，聯(lián)合專家組走訪了湖北省疾控中心、武漢市疾控中心、武漢病毒研究所等機構(gòu)，參觀了各類生物安全實驗室，與相關(guān)機構(gòu)的專家進行了深入、坦誠的科學(xué)交流。經(jīng)過實地走訪和深入了解，專家組一致認為，關(guān)于實驗室事件引發(fā)病毒這種假說是極為不可能的，這也是此次發(fā)布的溯源聯(lián)合研究報告中所明確的一個重要科學(xué)結(jié)論。
As to your remarks that Director-General Tedros said the possibility of lab leak cannot be completely ruled out and they need further study, I want to say that in the China-WHO COVID-19 origin-tracing joint study, experts of the joint mission made field trips to institutions including the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control, the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and visited biosafety laboratories and had in-depth and candid exchanges with experts there. Through these field trips and in-depth visits, members of the mission unanimously agreed that the allegation of lab leaking is extremely unlikely, and this is an important scientific conclusion made clear in the joint study report released this time.
我想強調(diào)的是，中方是應(yīng)世衛(wèi)組織請求，同世衛(wèi)組織開展聯(lián)合溯源科學(xué)研究。各方都應(yīng)當尊重科學(xué)、尊重科學(xué)家的意見和結(jié)論。在此方面世衛(wèi)組織尤其應(yīng)該發(fā)揮表率作用。
I want to stress that China is conducting joint scientific research on origin-tracing with the WHO at the request of the latter. All parties should respect science and the opinion and conclusion of scientists. The WHO, in particular, should set a good example in this regard.
至于進一步開展研究問題，你可能也注意到，在世衛(wèi)組織國際專家組視頻新聞發(fā)布會上，有專家表示，對實驗室泄露的猜測一直存在，但在中國經(jīng)過認真的考察，沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)任何可疑跡象。他們詳細了解了有關(guān)實驗室的管理情況、工作規(guī)范以及近期病毒研究情況，認為“實驗室泄露”極不可能。專家在視頻新聞發(fā)布會上也表示，當然，如果有進一步證據(jù)顯示有必要重新評估該假設(shè)，也可對世界各地的有關(guān)實驗室開展工作。
As for the question of further research, I think you may also note that in the video press conference of the WHO mission, the experts said that there has always been speculation about lab leak, but after earnest study in China, no suspicious signs have been found. They took a detailed look at the management of the laboratory, its working practices and recent virus research, and concluded that a "lab leak" was "extremely unlikely". They added that work could be done with laboratories around the world if there is further evidence that the hypothesis needs to be reassessed.
我昨天也講了，在實驗室泄露問題上始終有個問號。這次專家組在武漢進行了深入考察，但我們也知道，早期有很多疫情在世界多地多點暴發(fā)的報道，除了德特里克堡生物基地，有國家在全球還有200多個生物基地。所以如果有需要的話，應(yīng)該讓科學(xué)家本著科學(xué)的精神和態(tài)度，對其他世界各地的相關(guān)實驗室開展工作。我們希望，其他有關(guān)國家也能夠像中方一樣，本著科學(xué)、開放、透明和負責(zé)任的態(tài)度，同世衛(wèi)組織專家開展密切合作，相信這是符合世界利益的。因為大家都希望找到答案，以便今后可以更好地應(yīng)對類似公共衛(wèi)生危機。
As I said yesterday, there is always a question mark over lab leak. The expert team had an in-depth study in Wuhan, and we also know there are many reports of early outbreaks various in many places around the world. In addition to Fort Detrick, certain country has more than 200 biological bases around the world. So I think, if necessary, scientists should be allowed to work in a scientific spirit with relevant laboratories around the world. We hope that other relevant countries will cooperate closely with WHO experts in a scientific, open, transparent and responsible manner, as China has done. We believe this serves the interest of the world. Because everyone wants answers so that we can better respond to similar public health crises in the future.
你的第二個問題，是指BBC駐華記者沙磊離開了中國大陸的問題，是嗎?
As to your second question, are you referring to BBC correspondent John Sudworth who has left China's mainland?
記者：是的。
Journalist: That's correct.
華春瑩：我也是這兩天在沙磊常駐記者證要延期的時候，才得知沙磊已經(jīng)不辭而別。他離境前沒有以任何方式告知中方相關(guān)部門，他因何原因離境我們不知道。你剛才提到他的報道。剛才記者會開始前我看到BBC發(fā)了一條推特，稱贊沙磊，說他“報道了一些中方不愿意讓世界知道的真相”。因此，我想多說幾句。
Hua Chunying: John Sudworth has left without saying goodbye. I wasn't aware of this development until his press card was due to expire a few days ago. He did not inform Chinese authorities in any way of the reason for his departure. You mentioned his reports. Right before this press conference, I saw a tweet update from BBC, praising John Sudworth's work which it says "has exposed truths the Chinese authorities did not want the world to know." I have a few more words to say in response to that.
首先，我要再次聲明，我們剛剛得知沙磊不辭而別。他是非正常離任，因為他沒有履行一個外國駐華記者離任前應(yīng)該履行的手續(xù)。
First of all, I will repeat that we have just learned that John Sudworth left without saying goodbye. It is definitely not normal for a foreign resident correspondent to leave without going through due procedures.
的確我們也聽說，新疆有一些民眾和實體因為沙磊的涉疆假新聞利益受到損害，打算起訴沙磊。這完全是民間行為，與中國政府無關(guān)。中國現(xiàn)在正在推進全面依法治國，民眾運用法律手段維護自身權(quán)利和利益的意識在不斷增強。我們也沒有聽說有中國政府部門威脅他。所以，如果沙磊認為他的報道是公正的、客觀的，他就應(yīng)該勇敢地應(yīng)訴，不用害怕。如果有證據(jù)表明他受到了威脅，他就應(yīng)該報警，我們會保護他的安全。但是他跑什么？這說明了什么問題？
We have heard though, some Xinjiang residents and entities that have suffered heavy losses because of the false reports by John Sudworth plan to seek legal redress against him. This has nothing to do with the Chinese government. As China is advancing the rule of law in an all-round way, there is stronger awareness among the Chinese citizens to safeguard their rights through the law. We have not heard of any threat from any Chinese authorities targeted against him. Therefore, if John Sudworth deems his report to be fair and objective, he should be able to defend himself in court without fear. If there was evidence that he was threatened in any way, he should have called the police and we would have kept him safe. Now what is he running away from? What do you think this means?
BBC制播了大量帶有強烈意識形態(tài)偏見的假新聞，嚴重偏離媒體報道客觀、平衡、公正的立場，特別是在涉疆、涉港和涉新冠肺炎疫情問題上散布了大量虛假信息，因此遭到了中國人民的強烈反對。中方多次向該臺提出了嚴正交涉，希望他們嚴肅對待中方立場，摒棄反華意識形態(tài)偏見和雙重標準，停止對華污蔑、抹黑、攻擊，客觀、公正、準確地報道中國。
The BBC has produced and broadcast a large number of fake news with strong ideological bias, seriously deviating from the objective, balanced and fair position of media reports. In particular, the BBC has spread large amount of false information about Xinjiang, Hong Kong and COVID-19, to which the Chinese people strongly oppose. The Chinese side has made solemn representations to BBC on many occasions, hoping that it will take China's position seriously, abandon anti-China ideological bias and double standards, stop anti-China slanders, smears and attacks, and report China in an objective, fair and accurate manner.
我這兩天看到張維為老師在《這就是中國》節(jié)目里有一個非常精彩的對話訪談，名字叫“西方媒體的信譽危機”。他在這期節(jié)目里提到了BBC。他舉了些例子。如在2019年香港修例風(fēng)波期間，BBC關(guān)于香港的報道充斥著雙重標準和假新聞。2019年10月，BBC報道過所謂“39名中國人偷渡英國并死在英國貨車里”的事件，結(jié)果最后查出來死者都是越南人，可是BBC對中國沒有一句道歉。BBC在國際議題上的造假行為甚至到了內(nèi)部人都看不下去的地步。2019年2月，BBC敘利亞新聞報道制片人達拉提在推特上發(fā)了一條推文，公布了被掩蓋已久的秘密，那就是：所謂關(guān)于敘利亞杜馬市的那段敘政府化學(xué)武器襲擊的視頻是自導(dǎo)自演的假新聞?？墒撬衣读诉@個事實以后，他的推特賬號就被封掉了。
I have recently watched a splendid talk show named "the credibility crisis of western media" featuring Mr. Zhang Weiwei in the program China Now. As Mr. Zhang Weiwei mentioned in the show, BBC's coverage of Hong Kong during the turbulence over the proposed amendment bill in 2019 was riddled with double standards and fake news. In October 2019, the BBC reported that 39 Chinese nationals were smuggled into the UK and died in a British lorry. It turned out that all the dead were Vietnamese. But the BBC has never made any apology whatsoever. The BBC was producing fake news on international issues to such an extent that even those working for the BBC couldn't stand it. In February 2019, BBC Syria producer Riam Dalati dropped a bombshell on the Syrian crisis by tweeting that the hospital scene in video footage taken after a suspected chemical attack in April 2018 was "fake". But after he revealed the truth, his Twitter account was banned.
我們都知道，BBC在報道中國時的不客觀、不公正令人觸目驚心。比如，今年1月份BBC播出的武漢疫情紀錄片，居然用中國警察反恐演練的畫面來指責(zé)中方“用蒙頭的手段拘捕民眾”。另外，BBC有英國皇家特許證，英國通信管理局可以監(jiān)管BBC的國內(nèi)部門，但唯獨不可以監(jiān)管BBC國際頻道。也就是說，負責(zé)對外傳播英國價值觀的BBC國際頻道拿到了為所欲為的“尚方寶劍”，其國際頻道不需要受到任何監(jiān)管。不久前，英國學(xué)者大衛(wèi)·塞奇威克出了一本書，名叫《假新聞工廠——來自BBC的故事》。他認為，現(xiàn)在BBC實際上已經(jīng)演變成了一個頑固的政治競選團體。非常有意思的是，英國《每日快報》也發(fā)表了一篇題為《BBC的失敗》的文章，里面專門提到了一項在英國進行的民調(diào)，發(fā)現(xiàn)幾乎一半的人都認為BBC近年來在新聞報道方面有失公正。這也就是為什么張維為先生認為現(xiàn)在西方媒體面臨信譽危機。我想他說出了很多中國人的心聲。
And when it comes to China, BBC's failure to be objective and fair is even more appalling. For example, the BBC's documentary on Wuhan, which was aired in January 2021, used footage of a Chinese police anti-terrorism drill to accuse the Chinese of detaining civilians with their heads covered. In addition, as far as I know, the BBC has a Royal Charter, which means the BBC World Service is free from the Ofcom regulation. In other words, the BBC World Service, which is responsible for promoting British values abroad, has been given the power to do whatever it wants. While BBC's domestic programs are subject to regulation, its international programs are allowed to run free. David Sedgwick, a British academic, recently published a book called "The Fake News Factory: Tales from BBC-land". In effect, he argues, the BBC has now transformed into a hard-core political party in all but name. Interestingly enough, the British media Daily Express also carried an article titled "BBC failures", which specifically referred to a poll conducted in the UK, which found that almost half of people believe that the BBC has failed to be unbiased in its reporting in recent years. That is why Mr Zhang Weiwei thinks Western media is now facing a credibility crisis. I think he speaks for a lot of Chinese people.
我想請我的同事播放一段視頻。這是我們在優(yōu)兔上看到的，一名外國博主講的關(guān)于BBC和鄭國恩的故事。（現(xiàn)場播放視頻）
Now I'm going to show you a video clip that we saw on YouTube, in which a foreign blogger told a story about the BBC and Adrian Zens. (Playing the video clip)
這個視頻驗證了我昨天說的謊言鏈條是怎么回事。
This video just corroborates what I said yesterday about the chain of lies.
我還想強調(diào)，中方始終依法依規(guī)保護外國記者在中國正常采訪和工作的權(quán)利，我們也一直努力為外國記者在華生活和工作提供便利和協(xié)助。我們反對的是針對中國的意識形態(tài)偏見，反對的是借所謂新聞自由炮制假新聞，反對的是違反新聞職業(yè)道德的行為。當一家媒體把意識形態(tài)和自己認為正確的價值觀凌駕于真實之上時，這和在抗擊疫情過程中將政治凌駕于科學(xué)之上的做法又有什么區(qū)別呢？后者付出的是生命的代價，前者必然付出信譽的代價。
I would also like to stress that China always protects the right of foreign journalists to report in China in accordance with law and regulations, and provides convenience and assistance for them to live and work here. What we oppose are ideological bias against China, fake news under the guise of so-called freedom of the press, and acts that violate professional ethics of journalism. When a media organization let ideology and its self-righteous values override truth, how is that different from letting politics override science in the face of the COVID-19 epidemic? The latter has paid the price of life, the former is bound to pay the price of credibility.
4
日本共同社記者：我的問題也是關(guān)于世衛(wèi)組織最新發(fā)布的病毒溯源研究報告。美國等14個國家31日發(fā)表共同聲明，對這份報告表達關(guān)切并提出疑問。請問中方對此有何評論？
Kyodo News Agency: A follow-up on the WHO report. Yesterday 14 countries including the US released a statement expressing their concern and raising questions over the report of the WHO-China joint study. Do you have a comment?
華春瑩：我們反復(fù)強調(diào)，溯源是科學(xué)問題，應(yīng)由全球科學(xué)家合作開展，不能被政治化，這是國際社會絕大多數(shù)國家的共識。美國糾集極少數(shù)國家發(fā)表所謂“聯(lián)合聲明”，公然質(zhì)疑否定中國—世衛(wèi)組織聯(lián)合專家組報告，這是他們不尊重科學(xué)、借溯源搞政治操弄的確鑿證據(jù)。美國其實早在報告發(fā)布前就已經(jīng)開始做這件事了，但響應(yīng)者寥寥。這種把病毒溯源政治化的做法極不道德，也不得人心，只能阻礙全球溯源合作，破壞全球抗疫努力，導(dǎo)致更多的生命損失，同國際社會團結(jié)抗疫的愿望完全背道而馳。相信國際社會絕大多數(shù)國家對此看得非常清楚，他們的圖謀不會得逞。有關(guān)國家應(yīng)該反躬自省，捫心自問：你們自己的抗疫工作究竟怎么樣？你們?yōu)閲H抗疫合作都做了什么？
Hua Chunying: We repeated many times that the study of origins is a scientific matter that should be conducted jointly by scientists all over the globe and should not be politicized. This is a consensus of the overwhelming majority of countries in the world. The US assembled a handful of countries and released this so-called statement, openly questioning and negating the joint report of the joint WHO-China study. This is solid evidence of their disregard for science and political manipulation of study of origins. The US has been working on this, even before the report came out, but with little support. It is deeply immoral to politicize study of origins in this way. Such unpopular move will only hamper global cooperation in tracing the origins, jeopardize international anti-pandemic cooperation, and cost more lives. It runs counter to the international community's aspiration for solidarity against the virus. This is crystal clear to the overwhelming majority of countries in the world. Such attempts will not succeed. Relevant countries should ask themselves about how they did in the fight against COVID-19 and what they have done for global anti-epidemic cooperation?
5 法新社記者：世衛(wèi)組織總干事昨天呼吁再次派專家組“調(diào)查”武漢病毒研究所。中方是否會允許世衛(wèi)專家組再次訪華，“調(diào)查”武漢病毒研究所？ AFP: I have a follow-up question on the comments by the WHO chief, who called yesterday for another investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology. So will China open a new WHO investigation into the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
華春瑩：我想你援引的話不太準確。根據(jù)我看到的專家組視頻新聞發(fā)布會報道，專家組表示對實驗室泄露的猜測一直存在，但是專家組與中方經(jīng)過認真的考察，沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)任何可疑的跡象。專家組與中方相關(guān)人員進行了坦誠和深入的討論，并詳細了解了有關(guān)實驗室的管理情況、工作規(guī)范以及近期病毒研究情況，認為“實驗室泄露”極不可能。當然，如果有進一步的證據(jù)顯示有必要重新評估該假設(shè)，我們也可針對世界各地的有關(guān)實驗室開展工作。
Hua Chunying: I think your quote may not be accurate. According to the reports on the press briefing of the joint mission, the expert group said that there has been speculation about a lab leak, but with earnest research, the experts found no suspicious signs. The experts had candid and in-depth discussion with relevant personnel on the Chinese side and they learned in detail the management practice, working protocols and recent virology research of relevant labs. They think it is extremely unlikely that the virus is leaked from the lab. If there is further evidence that require necessary re-assessment of this hypothesis, they will carry out the work on relevant laboratories across the world.這就是我剛才說的，專家組認為病毒在武漢實驗室泄露極不可能、基本排除。但是因為溯源問題非常復(fù)雜，需要科學(xué)家基于事實得出科學(xué)結(jié)論，所以專家組表示，如果有進一步證據(jù)顯示有必要重新評估的話，也可針對世界各地的有關(guān)實驗室開展工作。我們希望有關(guān)國家也能像中方這樣，本著開放、透明和負責(zé)任的態(tài)度，同世衛(wèi)組織專家組進行合作。
That is why I said the expert panel believes that it is extremely unlikely that the virus escaped from the lab in Wuhan and this possibility is basically ruled out. But given that origin-tracing is a complex issue and that conclusions should be reached by scientists on the basis of facts, the experts said that if there is further evidence that requires necessary re-assessment of this hypothesis, they will carry out the work on relevant laboratories across the world. Therefore, we hope relevant countries can cooperate with WHO expert mission in an open, transparent and responsible manner like China did.你可能也注意到，專家組還表示，病毒早期也可能在中國以外的地方傳播。溯源工作應(yīng)該基于全球視野，未來溯源工作不會局限于某一區(qū)域，需要多國多地開展。本次專家組的報告也提出了多項未來在全球開展的溯源任務(wù)。我們希望美國等有關(guān)國家也能像中國一樣，本著科學(xué)態(tài)度同世衛(wèi)組織開展溯源合作。
You may have noticed that the experts also said that the virus may have been spread in places other than China early on. This is one more reason that a global perspective is needed to carry out the origin-tracing work in multiple countries and sites. The report also proposes multiple tasks to be conducted worldwide. We hope the US and relevant countries can work with WHO in a science-based way like China did.6
澎湃新聞記者：世衛(wèi)方面稱，專家組曾表示在獲取原始數(shù)據(jù)方面遇到過一些困難，希今后的研究能實現(xiàn)更及時和全面的數(shù)據(jù)共享。中方對此有何回應(yīng)？
The Paper: The WHO said that the team "expressed the difficulties they encountered in accessing raw data. I expect future collaborative studies to include more timely and comprehensive data sharing". I wonder if China has any response?
華春瑩：去年7月中國同世衛(wèi)組織商定工作任務(wù)書后，中方就根據(jù)國際專家建議進一步開展數(shù)據(jù)收集、整理和分析工作，并在此次聯(lián)合溯源過程中同外方專家進行了共同分析。為了完成艱巨的科學(xué)合作交流任務(wù)，中方有關(guān)部門召集相關(guān)單位和數(shù)百名科學(xué)家盡全力進行數(shù)據(jù)搜集、整理和初步分析，并向世衛(wèi)專家逐條展示了需要特別關(guān)注的原始數(shù)據(jù)。國際專家也多次公開表示已就數(shù)據(jù)問題同中方進行了全面坦率討論。由于病例信息涉及大量個人隱私，根據(jù)中國法律，相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)不能復(fù)制和攜帶出境，其實很多國家都有這樣的情況。國際專家對此表示充分理解。在昨天舉行的記者會上，國際專家們又重申了這一點。下一步，中方愿繼續(xù)同國際專家共同研究和分析相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)。
Hua Chunying: After China and WHO agreed on the Terms of Reference (TOR) in July last year, China carried out data collection, collation, and analysis in accordance with the suggestions of the foreign experts. In the process of the joint mission, the Chinese and foreign experts also carried out a joint analysis of the data. To prepare for the scientific exchange and cooperation, the Chinese authorities gathered relevant institutions and several hundred scientists to collect, collate data and conduct initial analysis. The Chinese side also presented item by item raw data of particular concern. The international experts have also said on many open occasions that they had full and candid discussions with the Chinese side with regard to data issues. As the medical files contain a large amount of information which is personal privacy, relevant data are not allowed by law to be copied or taken abroad, which is common practice in many countries. The international experts said they completely understand. At yesterday's press conference, they reiterated this point. Going forward, China stands ready to continue working with international experts to jointly study and analyze the data.
7 《中國日報》記者：一些西方國家稱中國政府干預(yù)世衛(wèi)國際專家組工作，導(dǎo)致國際專家組獨立性、專業(yè)性、透明度不足。中方對此有何回應(yīng)？ China Daily: Some Western countries have accused the Chinese government of interfering in the WHO team's work, leading to a lack of independence, professionalism and transparency of the mission. Do you have a response? 華春瑩：這次來中國的17名國際專家，都是世衛(wèi)組織挑選，多數(shù)來自美國、英國、法國、澳大利亞等西方國家，中方?jīng)]有對專家組組成提出過異議。事實上，中國政府為這次聯(lián)合溯源作了大量行政、技術(shù)、后勤保障工作，為專家組工作提供了充分便利、安排了豐富的實地參訪行程。專家實地參訪需求由專家組自主提出，訪談對象和訪談內(nèi)容由專家組現(xiàn)場自主確定，報告也由專家組自行起草，所謂的“干預(yù)”完全是無稽之談。多名國際專家多次在不同場合表示“想去的地方都去了，想見的人都見了”，對中方的開放和透明給予了積極評價。
Hua Chunying: The 17 international experts who came to China were all selected by the WHO. Most are from Western countries including the US, the UK, France and Australia. China didn't raise any objection to the makeup of the team. As a matter of fact, the Chinese government did a lot of administrative, technical and logistic support work for this joint study of origins, offered the team every convenience, and arranged a rich itinerary with many site visits. The experts on the mission made their own decisions independently as to where they would like to visit, who they would like to talk to and what they would like to talk about as the field work proceeded. The report is also drafted by the mission independently. It is just absurd to allege any sort of interference. Several international experts have said on multiple occasions that they visited all the places they wanted to go and met with all the people they wanted to see, speaking highly of China's openness and transparency.
你說的這些局外人本身沒有參加溯源工作，卻出來指責(zé)專家組受到所謂“干預(yù)”，這很不嚴肅，也極不負責(zé)任。他們就是想通過編造散布謠言把水攪混，以達到不可告人的政治目的。大家對此看得很清楚。
Those outsiders who never took part in the joint study are now accusing the team of being interfered. This is highly frivolous and irresponsible. They want to muddy the waters by making up and spreading rumors to achieve their hidden political purposes. We can all see this very clearly.
其實不只在溯源問題上，在其他一些問題上，比如說涉疆問題上，大家也可以看到，西方一些人先入為主、有罪推定，任何事情，甚至是他們親眼看到的，只要不符合他們的臆想和編造，他們就會說受到干預(yù)、缺乏獨立、不透明。事實證明，每次他們這樣的妄論都會被事實一次次打臉。希望相關(guān)國家和人士以實事求是的精神，放棄在有關(guān)問題上搞政治操弄。
Besides the origin-tracing issue, some in the West also have preconceptions with presumption of guilt on other issues, including on Xinjiang. As long as what they see does not conform to their imagination or conjecture, they will label it as results of intervention, the lack of independence and transparency. Facts have proved that every time they make such statements, they will be slapped in the face again and again by the facts. I hope that the relevant people can still show some respect for facts and give up such a bad practice or attempt of political manipulation.
8
湖北廣電記者：日前，沙特王儲穆罕默德宣布“綠色沙特”、“綠色中東”兩項應(yīng)對氣候變化的新倡議。中方對此有何評論？
HRTN: Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has announced the "Saudi Arabia Green Initiative" and the "Middle East Green Initiative" in response to climate change. Do you have any comment?
華春瑩：中方對沙特王儲穆罕默德宣布“綠色沙特”和“綠色中東”兩項倡議表示歡迎，贊賞沙方為應(yīng)對氣候變化、保護環(huán)境所采取的積極舉措。氣候變化問題是全球性挑戰(zhàn)，中方愿同包括沙特在內(nèi)的國際社會一道，攜手構(gòu)建合作共贏、公平合理的氣候治理體系。
Hua Chunying: We welcome Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's announcement of the "Saudi Arabia Green Initiative" and the "Middle East Green Initiative" and appreciate Saudi Arabia's positive efforts to address climate change and protect the environment. Climate change is a global challenge. China stands ready to work with Saudi Arabia and other parties to build an equitable and reasonable climate governance system that features win-win cooperation.9
《華爾街日報》記者：關(guān)于世衛(wèi)組織總干事表示應(yīng)進一步“調(diào)查”新冠病毒從實驗室泄露的可能性，你剛才做了回答，你的意思是否是指，中方不會允許針對武漢病毒研究所或其他中國的研究所的進一步“調(diào)查”（investigation）？還是說，中方接受進一步“調(diào)查”的前提是也對美國等其他國家的實驗室進行“調(diào)查”？第二個問題，歐盟就世衛(wèi)組織報告發(fā)表聲明，對溯源研究啟動過晚、得到數(shù)據(jù)有限等感到遺憾，呼吁進行獨立、透明“調(diào)查”。中方對此有何評論？第三個問題，你能否介紹此次溯源“調(diào)查”第二階段研究將何時開展？中方是否已開始進行相關(guān)工作？如果是的話，是針對哪一部分？
Wall Street Journal: Another follow-up question on Dr. Tedros' remarks on the need for further investigation into the possibility of a laboratory incident being behind the leak of the virus. Are you saying that China will not allow any further investigation of the Wuhan Institute of Virology or other Chinese laboratories? Or are you saying that it will only allow that if there is also investigation of the laboratories in other countries, including in the United States. Second question, do you have any response to the European Union's statement on the Wuhan mission which also expressed regrets over delays and the lack of access and called for an independent and transparent investigation. And thirdly, do you have any information on when the phase two studies of this global study will begin. Is China already working on some parts of that. If so, which parts?
華春瑩：其實你問的三個問題，我剛才都解答了。
Hua Chunying: In fact, I almost covered all three questions you asked in my previous replies.
關(guān)于第一個問題，我要糾正你，這不是investigation—調(diào)查，而是聯(lián)合溯源科學(xué)研究。中方的態(tài)度從來都是開放、透明、坦誠和負責(zé)任的。我剛才已經(jīng)介紹了，這次聯(lián)合專家組已經(jīng)走訪了包括武漢病毒研究所在內(nèi)的各類生物安全實驗室。經(jīng)過深入、坦誠的科學(xué)交流和實地走訪，他們基本上排除了實驗室事件引發(fā)病毒這種假說，認為這是極不可能的。這一結(jié)論是經(jīng)過在武漢進行深入科學(xué)考察和合作研究之后得出的，也是這次的溯源聯(lián)合報告中所明確的一個重要科學(xué)結(jié)論。專家組也明確表示，如有進一步的證據(jù)顯示有必要重新評估該假設(shè)，也可以針對世界各地的有關(guān)實驗室開展工作。
On your first question, I need to correct you on that. This is not an investigation, it's a scientific joint study on COVID-19 origin-tracing. China's attitude has always been open, transparent, candid and responsible. As I just mentioned, the joint mission already visited various biosafety laboratories including the WIV. Through in-depth, candid scientific research and field visits, they basically ruled out the hypothesis of lab leak, deeming it as extremely unlikely. This conclusion is drawn after in-depth scientific study and joint research in Wuhan, and is also a definite and important conclusion in the joint report. The experts have made it clear that if there is further evidence to warrant a reassessment, related work can also be carried out in relevant laboratories around the world.
大家都知道，現(xiàn)在對武漢病毒研究所已經(jīng)考察過了，那么美國德特里克堡這個存在很大問號的生物基地，什么時候允許國際專家去？你們美國媒體從疫情發(fā)生以來始終諱莫如深。前年6月份的時候美國媒體還有報道，但后來怎么就不見報道了呢？美國媒體不是一直有刨根問底、順藤摸瓜做深入調(diào)查報告的“好傳統(tǒng)”嗎？為什么擅長這種調(diào)查報道的媒體現(xiàn)在都不吭氣兒了呢？
As you all know, they've looked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and done some research. So when will the US biological base at Fort Detrick, with a big question mark over it, allow international experts in for a visit? It seems that the US media have avoided covering this issue since the outbreak of the epidemic. In June 2019, there were reports in the US media about this, but later on we could hardly see any. Why is that? Haven't you American media always had a fine tradition of getting to the bottom of things, following the facts, and doing in-depth investigative reports? Why do the media, which are so good at this kind of investigative reporting, now remain silent?
對中方來說，我們的態(tài)度是一以貫之的。我們大大方方、坦坦蕩蕩、光明磊落，已經(jīng)接待了世衛(wèi)組織專家組來武漢考察。我們還邀請了美國媒體去武漢病毒研究所進行參訪。如果有需要，我們希望美方也能像中方一樣展現(xiàn)出這樣坦誠合作的姿態(tài)。
As far as China is concerned, our attitude is consistent. We have always been open, frank and aboveboard, and have welcomed the expert group to visit Wuhan. We also invited US media to visit and interview the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If necessary, we also hope that the US side can show such a candid and cooperative gesture as China did.
關(guān)于第二個問題，我剛才也已說過，此次來華的國際專家都是世衛(wèi)組織挑選的，多數(shù)來自美國、英國、法國、澳大利亞等西方國家，中方?jīng)]有對專家組組成提出過異議，所以怎么個干預(yù)法？我剛才也講了，有些西方國家的確習(xí)慣于先入為主，只要他們沒有達到自己的目的，得出的結(jié)論不是他們所想要的，他們就會扣上各種罪名，說不獨立、不開放、不透明。但事實到底怎么樣？他們自己做的怎么樣？
On your second question, like I said just now, the international experts who came to China this time were selected by the WHO, and most of them came from the US, the UK, France, Australia and other Western countries. China has not raised any objection to the composition of the team. How could anyone say we intervene in this? As I said just now, some Western countries are really used to preconceived ideas. Whenever they fail to achieve their goals and see conclusions that are not what they want, they will make accusations of lack of independence, openness and transparency. But what is the truth? How are they doing on their own?
關(guān)于第三個問題，我剛才也回答過。聯(lián)合專家組已經(jīng)指出，溯源工作應(yīng)基于全球視野，未來溯源工作不會局限于某一領(lǐng)域，需要多國多地開展。本次專家組報告也提出多項未來在全球開展的溯源任務(wù)。
As for your third question, I have just answered it. The joint mission has pointed out that the origin-tracing work should take a global perspective. The relevant work going forward will not be limited to a certain field, but needs to be carried out in multiple countries. The joint report also proposed a number of future origin-tracing tasks worldwide.
我覺得，現(xiàn)在的溯源工作有點像破案，有很多撲朔迷離的線索。需要慧眼，排除各種“亂花漸欲迷人眼”的表面問題，從各種跡象中找出實質(zhì)，既不能冤枉好人，也不能放過壞人。所有值得研究的線索都應(yīng)該抓住?，F(xiàn)在有些西方國家拼命干擾科學(xué)家工作。這種政治干擾，是非常不嚴肅、不負責(zé)任的。
I think the origin-tracing is a bit like solving a criminal case, and there are a lot of confusing clues. It is necessary to eliminate all kinds of superficial issues and find out the essence from all kinds of signs. We can neither wrong a good man nor spare a bad man. All the clues that are worth investigating should be closely grasped. Some Western countries are now trying to interfere with the work of scientists. Such political interference is highly irresponsible and frivolous.
我們還是主張把這項工作交給科學(xué)家去做，不要有任何政治干擾，不要有任何政治偏見。這才是應(yīng)有的負責(zé)任態(tài)度，這才是對人類負責(zé)任的態(tài)度。讓科學(xué)家找出問題真正出在哪里，今后我們才可以更有效去應(yīng)對。
We still maintain that this work should be left to scientists, without any political interference or bias. This is a responsible attitude we should assume, towards the whole mankind. Let scientists figure out what the problem really is so we can deal with it more effectively in the future.
追問：我想說明下，關(guān)于第三個問題，世衛(wèi)組織報告中提到要開展第二階段研究，其中提出了幾個步驟，包括進一步研究2019年12月之前可能出現(xiàn)的感染病例。世衛(wèi)組織總干事昨天在成員國通報會上表示，需得到全面數(shù)據(jù)，包括始于2019年9月的生物樣本。第二階段研究將何時啟動？如果已啟動，目前有何進展？
Follow-up: Just to clarify my third question, I was talking about the phase two studies that are recommended in the report from the joint WHO China mission. This is the report that has been endorsed also by the Chinese side. It calls for several further steps, including closer analysis of potential earlier cases from before December 2019. Dr. Tedros again in his meeting with member states yesterday, said that it was necessary to get full access to data, including biological samples from at least September 2019. My question is, when do those phase two studies begin or if they have already begun? What work is already being done?
華春瑩：我剛才已經(jīng)說過，這個事情應(yīng)該由科學(xué)家去做，我沒有權(quán)利來決定什么時候開始，要不要做。我也想提醒你，世衛(wèi)組織國際專家組組長安巴雷克在視頻新聞發(fā)布會上也提到，病毒早期可能在中國以外的地方傳播。其他國家發(fā)表的研究文獻顯示可能存在更早期的傳播，對這些文獻應(yīng)該加大研究力度。所以聯(lián)合專家組指出，溯源工作應(yīng)該基于全球視野，不會局限于某一區(qū)域，需要多國多地開展。至于什么時候開始，我們應(yīng)該把這個任務(wù)交給國際專家組，交給世衛(wèi)組織去開展。不要太過著急，不要想著介入施加影響。這才是應(yīng)有的正確態(tài)度。
Hua Chunying: As I said just now, this is a matter for scientists, and I don't have the right to decide when or whether to do it. I would also like to remind you that the head of the WHO joint mission Peter Ben Embarek also mentioned in the video press conference that the virus could have been present outside of China in the early stage. Studies published in other countries also suggest the possibility of earlier transmission and more efforts should be made to study these papers. Therefore, the joint mission pointed out that the origin-tracing work should be based on a global perspective, and not be limited to a single region. It needs to be carried out in multiple places in various countries. As for when to start, we should leave this task to international experts and WHO. Don't be too hasty and don't try to intervene. That's the right attitude.
10 英國廣播公司記者：首先，剛才播放的視頻里這個人提到BBC與鄭國恩的關(guān)系，我是BBC的制片人，負責(zé)與鄭國恩有關(guān)的涉疆報道，我從未見過視頻里這個人，從未跟他交談過或發(fā)過郵件。所以我不明白，他為什么知道所謂BBC和鄭國恩聯(lián)系的情況呢？如果中方想了解我們與鄭國恩聯(lián)系的細節(jié)，為什么不問我們？第二，我要糾正一下你提到有關(guān)BBC監(jiān)管的問題，BBC接受Ofcom的監(jiān)管，你應(yīng)該了解Ofcom，它最近撤銷了CGTN在英國落地的許可。 BBC: I want to ask about the video you showed us earlier which was about the BBC's relationship with Adrian Zenz. I was the producer who worked on all the reports on Xinjiang which featured Adrian Zenz. I've never met the man who's in that video. I've never spoken to him. I've never exchanged an Email with him. So I don't understand why it is that he's supposed to have some expertise or insight into our supposed relationship with Adrian Zenz. If you would like to know the details of how we work with Adrian Zenz, why don't you ask us? And indeed any media outlet who wants to know about that is very welcome to put a question to us about it. Secondly, I'd like to correct what you said about regulation in the BBC. The BBC is regulated. We have to abide by Ofcom regulations. And I'm sure you know that's the body recently revoked CGTN's license to broadcast in the UK.
華春瑩：我很高興今天你來了，非常好。請我的同事把剛才那段視頻再播一遍，畫面停止在有鄭國恩推文的那段。（現(xiàn)場播放視頻）
Hua Chunying: Great, I'm glad you are here. I would like to ask my colleague to play that video clip once again and pause when the Twitter image comes up. (Play video clip)
我想，你應(yīng)該找到答案了。首先，這個人我也不認識，我是在優(yōu)兔上看到的，覺得非常有意思。第二，你說你作為BBC制作人，你不認識他，這很正常，因為鄭國恩說BBC問他要證據(jù)，不見得就是你本人問他要，對不對？其次，你可以看到，這人是從鄭國恩本人的推特上看到的，是鄭國恩自己發(fā)推特說BBC問他要“證據(jù)”，他覺得找“證據(jù)”很難，因為“證據(jù)”太少了，所以BBC給了鄭國恩傭金，鄭國恩又去找了更多“證據(jù)”。所以是鄭國恩自己發(fā)推特說BBC問他要“證據(jù)”。但BBC方面是誰，是你還是你的同事聯(lián)系的鄭國恩，我就不知道了。這可能需要你們BBC內(nèi)部再做進一步調(diào)查，把這個事情查清楚，到底鄭國恩的“證據(jù)”哪來的。這對BBC挽回信譽也是有好處的。
I think you've got the answer. First, I don't know this person either. I only saw the video on YouTube and found it very interesting. Second, you said you are a BBC producer, but you don't know him. Well, this is nothing strange, because you see, Adrian Zenz said BBC approached him, not necessarily you yourself approached him, right? Second, as you can see from the video, the speaker saw from the tweet by Adrian Zenz that BBC asked him whether it could be done, and he said no, too hard, too little evidence. So the BBC asked again with a commission and then Zenz found more evidence. So Zenz tweeted about all this himself. But whether it is you yourself or someone else working with the BBC who approached him, I have no idea. Perhaps BBC needs to conduct an internal investigation to find out more about this and where Zenz got all the "evidence". This could also help salvage your reputation.
我看你好像有點不太服氣，但是事實和證據(jù)已經(jīng)很清楚了。比如，今年1月BBC播出的武漢疫情紀錄片中說中國“用蒙頭的手段拘捕民眾”，但實際上這是中國警察反恐訓(xùn)練的一個鏡頭。還有其他一些被媒體揭露出來的情況，比如BBC拍攝了一些所謂中國政府干擾報道新疆存在“強迫勞動”的內(nèi)容，后來事實證明這是BBC做的手腳和處理。
You don't seem to agree with what I'm saying, but the evidence is overwhelming. For example, in January this year, BBC broadcast a documentary about the epidemic in Wuhan, showing an anti-terrorism drill but depicting it as "violent law enforcement" by China's epidemic prevention teams. There are also other media revelations. For example, BBC filmed alleged footage of Chinese personnel disrupting its coverage of "forced labor" in Xinjiang, but as it turned out, there was just BBC tampering and distortion.
你還提到BBC和Ofcom的關(guān)系。的確，Ofcom可以監(jiān)管BBC的許多部門。但Ofcom有權(quán)力監(jiān)管BBC國際頻道嗎？我們看到的報道是，Ofcom可以監(jiān)管BBC在英國國內(nèi)的部門，但是BBC有英國皇家特許證，也就是說，Ofcom沒有權(quán)利監(jiān)管BBC國際頻道。換言之，BBC國內(nèi)頻道如果播出了假新聞，就要受到Ofcom的監(jiān)管，可能會受到懲罰，可是BBC國際頻道就不受任何監(jiān)管，它有“尚方寶劍”，可以肆意炮制虛假信息，而不受英法律監(jiān)管和制裁。這是我從公開材料中看到的。如果你們BBC國際頻道的確也受Ofcom監(jiān)管的話，歡迎你告訴我們更多細節(jié)。
You also mentioned the relationship between BBC and Ofcom. It is true that Ofcom can regulate many BBC departments. But does it hold any power over BBC World Service? The answer, as we see from reports, is no, because BBC has the Royal Charter. That is to say, if BBC airs fake news in its domestic channels, it is subject to Ofcom regulation and may be punished. But BBC World Service is immune from any form of regulation and can produce all the disinformation it likes with legal impunity in the UK. This is from material openly available. But if BBC World Service is subject to Ofcom regulation, do inform me with more details.
英國學(xué)者大衛(wèi)·塞奇威克出了一本書，名叫《假新聞工廠——來自BBC的故事》，認為現(xiàn)在BBC實際上就是一個頑固的政治競選團體，這種轉(zhuǎn)變顯然違背了皇家特許證對它的要求，即保持公正和政治中立，這也是導(dǎo)致“假新聞病毒”在英國蔓延的原因。英國自己的媒體《每日快報》也發(fā)表過一篇題為《BBC的失敗》的文章，提到對英國的民調(diào)發(fā)現(xiàn)幾乎一半的人都認為BBC近年來在新聞報道方面有失公正。這就是為什么BBC面臨信譽危機。你們自己需要采取行動，做出努力，來改變?nèi)藗儗BC的這種印象。你們應(yīng)該以更多客觀、公正、真實、符合實際情況的新聞來證明BBC值得信賴。
David Sedgwick, a British academic, wrote a book called "The Fake News Factory: Tales from BBC-land", saying that the BBC has now transformed into a hard-core political party in all but name. The turn has clearly deviated from the requirement of impartiality and political neutrality by the Royal Charter, which has caused the spread of the fake news virus in the UK. British media the Daily Express also published an article "BBC failures", citing poll results which find nearly half Britons see lack of impartiality in BBC news reports in recent years. That's why BBC faces a credibility crisis. You need to take actions and make efforts if you want to change people's perception. You should prove that BBC can be trusted with more objective, just, truthful and faithful reports.
以上就是【雙語】例行記者會 2021-3-31的全部內(nèi)容，希望對你有所幫助！
- 用戶搜索
瘋狂英語 英語語法 新概念英語 走遍美國 四級聽力 英語音標 英語入門 發(fā)音 美語 四級 新東方 七年級 賴世雄 zero是什么意思南京市城西紡織公寓英語學(xué)習(xí)交流群
