【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2020年12月15日 汪文斌

喜歡口譯的同學(xué)，大多抱有一個(gè)外交官的理想，而雙語例行記者會(huì)上快節(jié)奏的你問我答及現(xiàn)場(chǎng)翻譯，則給我們提供了寶貴的學(xué)習(xí)資源。下面是小編整理的關(guān)于【雙語】例行記者會(huì) 2020年12月15日 汪文斌的資料，希望大家在這些唇槍舌劍中，提升英語，更熱愛祖國(guó)！

2020年12月15日外交部發(fā)言人汪文斌主持例行記者會(huì)

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on 15 December, 2020

 

路透社記者：中國(guó)官方媒體今天報(bào)道稱，澳大利亞輸華煤炭清關(guān)正受到限制，并稱中方對(duì)澳煤炭輸華正式實(shí)施了禁令。外交部可否提供更多細(xì)節(jié)？報(bào)道并援引官員消息稱，中方正放松對(duì)來自蒙古、印度尼西亞、俄羅斯煤炭的進(jìn)口限制。這些限制具體指什么？

Reuters: A state media report this morning says that Australia is facing clearance regulations on coal. It suggested that there’s a more formal ban on Australian coal. Can the Foreign Ministry give any details on that? And also the report cites officials saying that it would reduce restrictions on other coal imports from Mongolia, Indonesia and Russia. Can the Foreign Ministry clarify what restrictions it was referring to?

 

汪文斌：我不了解你所說的情況，請(qǐng)向有關(guān)主管部門詢問。我想告訴你的是，中方主管部門近來依法依規(guī)對(duì)一些澳大利亞輸華產(chǎn)品采取相關(guān)措施，符合中國(guó)法律法規(guī)和國(guó)際慣例，也是對(duì)中國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)和消費(fèi)者負(fù)責(zé)任的行為。近期我們屢屢聽到澳方以所謂“受害者”自居，不斷對(duì)中方進(jìn)行影射、指責(zé)，這完全是混淆視聽、倒打一耙。中方對(duì)此絕不接受。事實(shí)上，正是澳方近年來將經(jīng)貿(mào)、投資、科技等問題政治化，違背市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)原則和國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)規(guī)則對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)采取歧視性措施，在錯(cuò)誤的道路上越走越遠(yuǎn)。我想給大家列出三點(diǎn)事實(shí)：

Wang Wenbin: I am not aware of the specific situation and would refer you to the competent authority. But I want to point out that recent measures taken by the Chinese authorities on some imported products from Australia are in line with China’s laws and regulations and international practices. They are also responsible steps to safeguard the interests of domestic industries and consumers. Recently we’ve seen many reports in which Australia dresses up as a victim, pointing an accusing finger at China, directly or by insinuation. This move is meant to confound the public and we will never accept it. In fact, it is the Australian side that has been politicizing economic, investment and technological issues, and discriminating against Chinese companies in violation of market economy principles and international trade rules. It has gone so far down the wrong path. I can give you three examples to prove my point.

 

第一，2018年以來，十多個(gè)中方赴澳投資項(xiàng)目都被澳方以莫須有的所謂“國(guó)家安全”理由拒絕，這其中包括香港長(zhǎng)江基建集團(tuán)收購(gòu)澳天然氣集團(tuán)、蒙牛乳業(yè)收購(gòu)澳雄獅乳品等基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、農(nóng)牧業(yè)領(lǐng)域項(xiàng)目，給中方企業(yè)造成巨額損失。今年3月、6月，澳方連續(xù)修改外商投資法，大幅加強(qiáng)對(duì)外資所謂“國(guó)家安全審查”，澳大利亞自己國(guó)內(nèi)媒體解讀為這就是針對(duì)中國(guó)，完全背離《中澳自貿(mào)協(xié)定》中有關(guān)雙方應(yīng)為對(duì)方投資提供便利、不斷降低投資審查門檻的承諾。正是由于澳方針對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)采取的一系列歧視性做法，中國(guó)企業(yè)對(duì)澳大利亞投資自2017年起連年大幅下降，去年投資額較2016年下降85%。

First, since 2018, a dozen of Chinese investment projects were turned down by the Australian side on the grounds of so-called national security, including Hong Kong CK Infrastructure Holdings’ takeover offer for Australia’s APA Group, and Mengniu Diary’s purchase of Lion Diary of Australia. These investment projects cover infrastructure, agriculture and husbandry fields, and their blocks caused huge losses for the Chinese companies. The Australian side amended its foreign investment law in March and June, substantially ramping up its screening on foreign investment in the name of national security. As the Australian media commented, these measures target no others but China. The China-Australia FTA makes it clear that the FTA should provide convenience for investors in both countries and continues to screen investments at lower threshold. So, what’s done by the Australian side went against the FTA. Because of these discriminatory actions, Chinese companies’ investments in Australia have nosedived since 2017, and the number of last year decreased by 85% compared to the 2016 level.

 

第二，澳方在沒有任何確鑿證據(jù)的情況下，以所謂“國(guó)家安全”為由挑頭禁止中國(guó)企業(yè)參與5G網(wǎng)絡(luò)建設(shè)，到現(xiàn)在依然沒有給出一個(gè)合理解釋。

Second, with no solid evidence, the Australian side led a few others in shutting out Chinese companies from participating in 5G network building. It has yet to offer a plausible explanation for that.

 

第三，截至目前，澳大利亞針對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)品發(fā)起的反傾銷、反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查多達(dá)106起，而中國(guó)對(duì)澳大利亞產(chǎn)品發(fā)起反傾銷、反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查總共只有4起。

Third, so far, the Australian side has mounted more than 106 anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations against China, but China only launched 4 such cases against the Australian side.

 

澳方一系列違背市場(chǎng)原則和中澳自貿(mào)協(xié)定精神的舉措，干擾了中澳務(wù)實(shí)合作的良好發(fā)展勢(shì)頭，也對(duì)澳大利亞自身形象和信譽(yù)造成損害。相比之下，中方信守承諾，積極履行《中澳自貿(mào)協(xié)定》規(guī)定的義務(wù)，于2015年至2020年連續(xù)6年調(diào)低自澳進(jìn)口關(guān)稅，目前約95%自澳進(jìn)口商品享受零關(guān)稅待遇。中國(guó)堅(jiān)定不移擴(kuò)大對(duì)外開放，營(yíng)商環(huán)境持續(xù)改善。在前不久舉行的第三屆中國(guó)國(guó)際進(jìn)口博覽會(huì)上，澳大利亞有150多家企業(yè)參展，在參展國(guó)家中數(shù)量位列前茅，顯示出澳大利亞企業(yè)對(duì)中國(guó)市場(chǎng)前景的充分信心。

These actions, in violation of market principles and China-Australia FTA, disrupted bilateral cooperation momentum and damaged Australia’s national image and reputation. In contrast, China has been honoring its words and obligations under the FTA. We’ve been lowering import tariffs for Australia for six years in row since 2015, and now about 95% of Australian imports enjoy zero-tariff treatment. China is committed to expanding opening-up and improving business environment. At the 3rd CIIE, more than 150 Australian companies showed up. This number is higher compared to those of other countries, which speaks to the confidence of Australian companies in the prospect of the Chinese market.

 

我想告訴大家的是，如果是建立在相互尊重、遵守規(guī)則基礎(chǔ)上的正常交往與合作，就沒有什么值得擔(dān)心的。反之，將正常經(jīng)貿(mào)活動(dòng)政治化并無端設(shè)限、違反國(guó)際關(guān)系基本準(zhǔn)則干涉別國(guó)內(nèi)政、甚至挑動(dòng)分歧和對(duì)抗，這才是真正值得擔(dān)憂的事。我們希望澳方能夠反躬自省、言行一致，切實(shí)為中澳各領(lǐng)域務(wù)實(shí)合作提供良好條件和氛圍，而不是相反。

I can assure you that there is nothing to worry about if it is normal exchange and cooperation based on mutual respect and in compliance with rules. On the contrary, what is worrying for us is such moves as politicizing and obstructing normal trade activities, interfering in others’ internal affairs in defiance of basic norms governing international relations and even provoking confrontation. We hope that the Australian side will reflect upon its own conduct, match its words with deeds, and provide favorable conditions for bilateral practical cooperation in various fields, instead of the opposite.

關(guān)于你提到的中方減少對(duì)有關(guān)國(guó)家煤炭進(jìn)口限制的情況，我并不了解，請(qǐng)你向有關(guān)主管部門詢問。

As for China reducing restrictions on other coal imports, I am not aware of the situation and would refer you to the competent authority.

 

路透社記者：巴西衛(wèi)生監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)（Anvisa）昨天稱，中國(guó)在巴西用于授權(quán)新冠疫苗緊急使用的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不透明。你對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Reuters: Brazil’s health regulator Anvisa said on Monday that China’s health authorities are not transparent in authorizing emergency use of COVID-19 vaccines in the country. Does the ministry have any comment on this?

 

汪文斌：首先，我想告訴你的是，中方一直高度重視疫苗安全性和有效性。中國(guó)疫苗研發(fā)企業(yè)嚴(yán)格依據(jù)科學(xué)規(guī)律和監(jiān)管要求，依法合規(guī)推進(jìn)疫苗研發(fā)，嚴(yán)格遵循國(guó)際規(guī)范和有關(guān)法律法規(guī)開展國(guó)際合作。你可能也注意到，中方有多款疫苗在相關(guān)國(guó)家開展了Ⅲ期臨床試驗(yàn)，中方疫苗在其他國(guó)家Ⅲ期臨床試驗(yàn)推進(jìn)情況總體上是順利的，取得了積極成效。近期我也了解到，已經(jīng)有一些國(guó)家批準(zhǔn)了中方疫苗的注冊(cè)使用。這都是中方疫苗安全性、有效性以及中方監(jiān)管部門遵循國(guó)際規(guī)范和有關(guān)法律法規(guī)的切實(shí)體現(xiàn)。

Wang Wenbin: First, I would like to assure you that China attaches high importance to vaccine safety and efficacy. Chinese vaccine companies advance research and development in strict accordance with science and regulation requirements and engage in international cooperation in strict compliance with international standards and relevant laws and regulations. You many have noticed that some Chinese vaccines have entered into phase III clinical trial in relevant countries, making smooth progress on the whole and yielding positive effects. I also learned that some countries have approved the registration and use of Chinese vaccines. These all serve to show the safety and effectiveness of Chinese vaccines as well as regulatory authority’s observance of international customary practice and laws.

 

關(guān)于你提到巴西的情況，中巴兩國(guó)開展疫苗合作總的來說是比較順利的。我注意到，中方疫苗企業(yè)的巴西合作伙伴表示，對(duì)中方疫苗有信心。我們?cè)竿鲊?guó)一道，積極推進(jìn)疫苗研發(fā)合作，為實(shí)現(xiàn)疫苗在全球特別是發(fā)展中國(guó)家的可及性和可負(fù)擔(dān)性作出積極貢獻(xiàn)，早日徹底戰(zhàn)勝疫情。

With regard to Brazil, as we stated earlier, vaccine cooperation between China and Brazil have been progressing generally smoothly. We noted that the Brazilian partner of the Chinese company expressed confidence in China’s vaccine. We stand ready to work with other countries to advance R&D cooperation and contribute to vaccine accessibility and affordability in the world, in particular developing countries so the world can vanquish the pandemic at an early date.

 

今日俄羅斯記者：美國(guó)各州舉行選舉人團(tuán)投票，確認(rèn)拜登當(dāng)選美國(guó)總統(tǒng)。中方對(duì)此有何回應(yīng)？習(xí)近平主席是否有與拜登通話的安排？

RIA Novosti: The U.S. electoral college has affirmed Biden’s election victory. Does China have a comment? Will President Xi Jinping have a telephone call with Mr. Biden?

 

汪文斌：關(guān)于你的第一個(gè)問題，我們注意到有關(guān)選舉結(jié)果。習(xí)近平主席已于11月25日致電拜登先生，祝賀他當(dāng)選美國(guó)總統(tǒng)。

Wang Wenbin: On your first question, we have taken note the election result. President Xi Jinping sent a telegraph on November 25 to Mr. Biden, congratulating him on winning the presidential election.

 

關(guān)于你的第二個(gè)問題，我們歷來主張中美雙方應(yīng)該加強(qiáng)溝通對(duì)話，秉持不沖突不對(duì)抗、相互尊重、合作共贏的精神，聚焦合作，管控分歧，推動(dòng)中美關(guān)系健康穩(wěn)定向前發(fā)展。至于你提到的具體問題，如果有消息我們將及時(shí)發(fā)布。

On your second question, we always believe that China stands ready to work together with the United States to strengthen communication, focus on cooperation, manage differences in the spirit of non-conflict, non-confrontation, mutual respect and win-win cooperation to advance the sound and stable development of bilateral ties. As to the specifics you asked about, if there is any information, we will release it in due course.

 

埃及中東通訊社記者：第一個(gè)問題，沙特阿拉伯周一稱，該國(guó)一艘停泊在紅海港口城市吉達(dá)的燃料運(yùn)輸船遭到一艘裝載爆炸物的船只襲擊并引發(fā)火災(zāi)，但無人員傷亡。許多國(guó)家譴責(zé)這次恐怖襲擊，認(rèn)為這威脅到航行自由和國(guó)際貿(mào)易安全。請(qǐng)問中方有何評(píng)論？第二個(gè)問題，美國(guó)昨天正式宣布將蘇丹從“支持恐怖主義國(guó)家”名單中移除。蘇丹主權(quán)委員會(huì)主席布爾漢稱，此舉對(duì)支持蘇丹民主過渡有促進(jìn)作用。阿拉伯國(guó)家聯(lián)盟和多國(guó)對(duì)此舉表示歡迎。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Middle East News Agency: First question. Saudi Arabia announced yesterday that a fuel transport ship anchored in the fuel terminal in its Red Sea port city of Jeddah was attacked by an explosive-laden boat, resulting in a fire with no casualties. Many countries condemned this terrorist attack as a threat to the security and freedom of navigation and international trade. Do you have any comment? My second question is about Sudan. U.S. officially announced yesterday to remove Sudan from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. Chairman of Sudan’s Sovereign Council Burhan said that this move contributes to supporting democratic transition. Arab League and many countries welcomed the move. Do you have any comment?

 

汪文斌：關(guān)于沙特有關(guān)船只在吉達(dá)遇襲事，中方譴責(zé)這一襲擊事件，一貫反對(duì)任何針對(duì)平民和民用設(shè)施的襲擊，呼吁有關(guān)方面避免采取導(dǎo)致地區(qū)緊張局勢(shì)升級(jí)的行動(dòng)。

Wang Wenbin: China condemns the attack against the ship in Saudi Arabia. We are consistently opposed to all attacks on civilians and civil facilities and call on relevant sides to avoid taking actions that might lead to escalation in regional tensions.

 

關(guān)于第二個(gè)問題，我們注意到有關(guān)報(bào)道。中方一貫反對(duì)任何國(guó)家依據(jù)國(guó)內(nèi)法對(duì)他國(guó)實(shí)施單邊制裁和“長(zhǎng)臂管轄”。我們支持蘇丹政府為改善外部環(huán)境所作的積極努力。

On your second question, we have taken note of relevant reports. China is consistently opposed to any country imposing unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction on other countries based on domestic law. We support the Sudanese government’s efforts towards improving external environment.

《北京青年報(bào)》記者：據(jù)報(bào)道，英國(guó)外交大臣拉布14日稱，香港國(guó)安法違反具有國(guó)際約束力的《中英聯(lián)合聲明》，目前被用來指控黎智英，凸顯中方持續(xù)攻擊人民權(quán)利和自由。英方已向香港特區(qū)政府提起此案并呼吁其停止針對(duì)黎和其他泛民派。外交部對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

Beijing Youth Daily: British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said on December 14 that “the Hong Kong National Security Law breaches the internationally-binding Joint Declaration, and is now being used to charge Jimmy Lai. This highlights the authorities’ continued attacks on the rights and freedoms of its people. We have raised this case with the authorities in Hong Kong and call on them to end their targeting of Lai and other pro-democracy voices”. Do you have any response?

 

汪文斌：香港特區(qū)政府已就有關(guān)案件表明立場(chǎng)。我想強(qiáng)調(diào)的是，中國(guó)是法治國(guó)家，香港是法治社會(huì)，法律面前人人平等，任何人都沒有法外特權(quán)，只有守法與違法之分，沒有政見親疏之別。

Wang Wenbin: The government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region already stated its position on the relevant case. I want to stress that China is a country under the rule of law and Hong Kong is a society under the rule of law. All people are equal before the law, and no one has impunity. What matters is w