【雙語(yǔ)】例行記者會(huì) 2020年7月1日 趙立堅(jiān)

喜歡口譯的同學(xué)，大多抱有一個(gè)外交官的理想，而雙語(yǔ)例行記者會(huì)上快節(jié)奏的你問(wèn)我答及現(xiàn)場(chǎng)翻譯，則給我們提供了寶貴的學(xué)習(xí)資源。下面是小編整理的關(guān)于【雙語(yǔ)】例行記者會(huì) 2020年7月1日 趙立堅(jiān)的資料，希望大家在這些唇槍舌劍中，提升英語(yǔ)，更熱愛(ài)祖國(guó)！

2020年7月1日外交部發(fā)言人趙立堅(jiān)主持例行記者會(huì)

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian’s Regular Press Conference on July 1, 2020

 

近年來(lái)，美國(guó)政府對(duì)中國(guó)媒體駐美機(jī)構(gòu)和人員的正常新聞報(bào)道活動(dòng)無(wú)端設(shè)限，無(wú)理刁難，不斷升級(jí)對(duì)中國(guó)媒體的歧視和政治打壓。2020年2月18日，美方將新華社、《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》美國(guó)發(fā)行公司、中國(guó)國(guó)際電視臺(tái)（CGTN）、中國(guó)國(guó)際廣播電臺(tái)、《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》海外版美國(guó)總代理（海天發(fā)展有限公司）5家中國(guó)媒體駐美機(jī)構(gòu)列為“外國(guó)使團(tuán)”。中方已于3月18日對(duì)等要求“美國(guó)之音”、《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》、《華爾街日?qǐng)?bào)》、《時(shí)代周刊》、《華盛頓郵報(bào)》5家美國(guó)媒體駐華機(jī)構(gòu)向外交部新聞司申報(bào)在中國(guó)境內(nèi)所有工作人員、財(cái)務(wù)、經(jīng)營(yíng)、所擁有不動(dòng)產(chǎn)信息等書(shū)面材料。

In recent years, the US government has placed unwarranted restrictions on Chinese media agencies and personnel in the US, purposely made things difficult for their normal reporting assignments, and subjected them to growing discrimination and politically-motivated oppression. On February 18, 2020, the US designated five Chinese media agencies, namely, Xinhua News Agency, China Daily Distribution Corporation, China Global Television Network, China Radio International, and distributor for People’s Daily in the US Hai Tian Development USA, as foreign missions. In the spirit of reciprocity, China demanded on March 18 that the China-based branches of Voice of America, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Time, and the Washington Post declare in written form information about their staff, finance, operation and real estate in China.

 

6月22日，美方再次宣布將中央電視臺(tái)（CCTV）、《人民日?qǐng)?bào)》、《環(huán)球時(shí)報(bào)》和中國(guó)新聞社4家中國(guó)媒體增加列管為“外國(guó)使團(tuán)”。作為對(duì)美方上述行動(dòng)的反制，中方宣布，要求美國(guó)聯(lián)合通訊社（AP）、美國(guó)國(guó)際合眾社（UPI）、美國(guó)哥倫比亞廣播公司（CBS）、美國(guó)全國(guó)公共廣播電臺(tái)（NPR），自即日起7日內(nèi)向中方申報(bào)在中國(guó)境內(nèi)所有工作人員、財(cái)務(wù)、經(jīng)營(yíng)、所擁有不動(dòng)產(chǎn)信息等書(shū)面材料。

On June 22, the US issued a new determination to designate four additional Chinese media agencies, namely, China Central Television, the People’s Daily, the Global Times and China News Service, as foreign missions. China demands in retaliation that the Associated Press, United Press International, Columbia Broadcasting System, and National Public Radio declare in written form information about their staff, finance, operation and real estate in China within seven days starting from today.

 

需要指出的是，中方上述措施完全是對(duì)美方無(wú)理打壓中國(guó)媒體駐美機(jī)構(gòu)被迫進(jìn)行的必要對(duì)等反制，完全是正當(dāng)防衛(wèi)。美方有關(guān)做法是基于冷戰(zhàn)思維和意識(shí)形態(tài)偏見(jiàn)，嚴(yán)重?fù)p害中國(guó)媒體的聲譽(yù)和形象，嚴(yán)重影響中國(guó)媒體在美正常運(yùn)作，嚴(yán)重干擾中美正常人文交流，暴露其自我標(biāo)榜的所謂“新聞自由”的虛偽性。中方敦促美方立即改弦更張、糾正錯(cuò)誤，停止對(duì)中國(guó)媒體的政治打壓和無(wú)理限制。

I need to point out that the above-mentioned measures are entirely necessary and reciprocal countermeasures that China is compelled to take in response to the unreasonable oppression the Chinese media organizations experience in the US. They are legitimate and justified self-defense in every sense. What the US has done is driven by a Cold War mentality and ideological bias. It has seriously tarnished the reputation and image of Chinese media organizations, seriously affected their normal operation in the US, and seriously disrupted people-to-people and cultural exchanges between the two countries. It has therefore exposed the hypocrisy of the self-styled advocate of press freedom. China urges the US to immediately change course, undo the damage, and stop its political oppression and arbitrary restrictions on Chinese media organizations.

 

中央電視臺(tái)記者：據(jù)報(bào)道，日前，針對(duì)少數(shù)西方國(guó)家在人權(quán)理事會(huì)妄議香港國(guó)家安全立法問(wèn)題，50多個(gè)國(guó)家做共同發(fā)言，反對(duì)西方國(guó)家干涉中國(guó)內(nèi)政，支持中方在涉港問(wèn)題上的立場(chǎng)和舉措。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

CCTV: As a small number of western countries dragged the national security legislation in Hong Kong to a Human Rights Council session, more than 50 countries in a joint statement expressed opposition to foreign interference in China’s internal affairs and support to China’s position and measures on Hong Kong-related issues. What is your comment?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：日前，古巴代表53個(gè)國(guó)家在人權(quán)理事會(huì)做共同發(fā)言，歡迎中國(guó)通過(guò)《中華人民共和國(guó)香港特別行政區(qū)維護(hù)國(guó)家安全法》，認(rèn)為這一舉措有利于“一國(guó)兩制”行穩(wěn)致遠(yuǎn)，有利于香港長(zhǎng)期繁榮穩(wěn)定，香港廣大居民的合法權(quán)利和自由也可在安全環(huán)境下得到更好行使。這些國(guó)家重申香港特別行政區(qū)是中國(guó)不可分割的一部分，香港事務(wù)是中國(guó)內(nèi)政，外界不應(yīng)干涉。

Zhao Lijian: On behalf of 53 countries, Cuba made a joint statement at this Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council, expressing their support for the passage of the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. They believe that the move is beneficial for the steady and long-term success of the “one country, two systems” principle and Hong Kong’s lasting prosperity and stability, and guarantees that Hong Kong residents can better exercise rights and freedoms in a safe environment. The statement stresses that Hong Kong is an inseparable part of China; Hong Kong’s affairs are China’s internal affairs, and external forces should not interfere.

 

國(guó)家安全立法屬于一國(guó)主權(quán)。中國(guó)全國(guó)人大根據(jù)中國(guó)憲法和香港基本法規(guī)定，從國(guó)家層面建立健全香港特區(qū)維護(hù)國(guó)家安全的法律制度和執(zhí)行機(jī)制，是堵塞香港國(guó)家安全法律漏洞、切實(shí)維護(hù)國(guó)家主權(quán)安全的必要之舉，也是確?！耙粐?guó)兩制”行穩(wěn)致遠(yuǎn)的治本之策。有關(guān)立法打擊的是極少數(shù)危害國(guó)家安全的違法犯罪行為和活動(dòng)，保障的是香港絕大多數(shù)居民的安全和依法享有的各項(xiàng)權(quán)利和自由。國(guó)際社會(huì)絕大多數(shù)國(guó)家充分理解和尊重中方維護(hù)國(guó)家安全的正當(dāng)合法努力。這些正義呼聲再次表明，公道自在人心。香港特區(qū)行政長(zhǎng)官林鄭月娥女士也在此次人權(quán)理事會(huì)上代表香港做了發(fā)言，支持香港國(guó)安立法，指出從國(guó)家層面建立健全香港維護(hù)國(guó)家安全的法律制度和執(zhí)行機(jī)制的必要性，以及中央對(duì)香港的憲制權(quán)力和中央立法的正當(dāng)性。

Every sovereign state has the inherent right to legislate in the interest of its national security. Establishing and improving the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for safeguarding national security in the HKSAR at the state level by the NPC in accordance with the Constitution and the Basic Law is a necessary step to plug loopholes in the HKSAR national security legislation and uphold national sovereignty and security and a fundamental solution to ensure the steady and successful implementation of the “one country, two systems”. The legislation targets a very narrow category of criminal acts and activities that endanger national security and protects the safety and rights and freedoms the vast majority of the Hong Kong residents enjoy in accordance with law. Most members of the international community fully understand and respect China’s legitimate and lawful act to safeguard national security. Their just voice shows again that people have no problem telling right from wrong. Chief Executive Carrie Lam also delivered a speech representing Hong Kong via video link at the Human Rights Council session. She expressed support for the legislation, pointing out the necessity to establish and improve at the state level the legal system and enforcement mechanisms for safeguarding national security in the HKSAR, the constitutional power of the state over the HKSAR, and legitimacy of this legislation.

 

香港國(guó)安立法問(wèn)題根本不是人權(quán)問(wèn)題，更不應(yīng)被政治化。少數(shù)外部勢(shì)力出于不可告人的目的，以人權(quán)之名行干涉之實(shí)，掩蓋不了其傲慢偏見(jiàn)和肆意干預(yù)別國(guó)內(nèi)政的本質(zhì)。一些人號(hào)稱尊重法治，卻違背國(guó)際社會(huì)要求遵守國(guó)際法原則和國(guó)際社會(huì)基本準(zhǔn)則的正義聲音。我們奉勸有關(guān)方面認(rèn)清形勢(shì)，客觀公正看待中方制定香港特區(qū)維護(hù)國(guó)家安全法，停止歪曲抹黑，停止干涉香港事務(wù)和中國(guó)內(nèi)政。

The national security legislation in the HKSAR is by no means a human rights issue, still less should it be politicized. A tiny number of external elements, with ulterior motives, have been meddling in this under the pretext of human rights. But nothing can cover up their arrogance, prejudice and real intention to flagrantly interfere in China’s internal affairs. Some people advertise themselves as respecting rule of law, but what they have done showed no regard for the just voices of the international community calling for adherence to the principles of international law and basic norms of the international relations. We urge the relevant parties to grasp the situation, view the legislation in an objective and impartial way, stop fact-distorting and slandering acts, and stop interfering in Hong Kong matters and China’s internal affairs.

 

CGTN記者：據(jù)報(bào)道，6月30日，美國(guó)眾議長(zhǎng)佩洛西、國(guó)務(wù)卿蓬佩奧、白宮國(guó)安會(huì)發(fā)言人尤利奧特等分別就香港國(guó)安立法問(wèn)題發(fā)聲，指責(zé)中方違背國(guó)際承諾，威脅采取強(qiáng)硬措施。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

CGTN: On June 30, US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, White House National Security Council Spokesman John Ullyot respectively made statements on China’s law on safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong SAR, accusing China of breaching international commitments and threatening to take tough measures. Does China have any comment?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：《中華人民共和國(guó)香港特別行政區(qū)維護(hù)國(guó)家安全法》已經(jīng)全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)審議通過(guò)，并自公布之日起施行。香港國(guó)安法將為全面準(zhǔn)確貫徹“一國(guó)兩制”方針，有效維護(hù)憲法和基本法所確立的特別行政區(qū)憲制秩序，保持香港長(zhǎng)期繁榮穩(wěn)定提供強(qiáng)大制度保障。

Zhao Lijian: The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Safeguarding National Security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) was adopted by the NPC Standing Committee and has entered into force upon its promulgation. This Law will provide a strong institutional guarantee for comprehensively and accurately implementing the “one country, two systems” principle, effectively upholding the constitutional order in the HKSAR as prescribed by the Constitution and the Basic Law, and ensuring Hong Kong’s enduring prosperity and stability.

 

我要重申，香港國(guó)家安全立法問(wèn)題純屬中國(guó)內(nèi)政，任何外國(guó)無(wú)權(quán)干涉。中國(guó)政府維護(hù)國(guó)家主權(quán)、安全、發(fā)展利益的決心堅(jiān)定不移，貫徹“一國(guó)兩制”方針的決心堅(jiān)定不移，反對(duì)任何外部勢(shì)力干涉香港事務(wù)的決心堅(jiān)定不移。我們奉勸美方正確、客觀看待香港國(guó)安法，立即停止借所謂香港問(wèn)題干涉中國(guó)內(nèi)政，不要在錯(cuò)誤的道路上越走越遠(yuǎn)。

I’d like to reiterate that the legislation on safeguarding national security in the HKSAR is entirely China’s internal affair that allows no foreign interference. The Chinese government is firm in its determination to safeguard China’s sovereignty, security and development interests, to implement the principle of “one country, two systems” and to oppose any external interference in Hong Kong affairs. We urge the US side to view the Law in a fair, objective manner, immediately stop interfering in our internal affairs under the pretext of Hong Kong, and refrain from going further down the wrong path.

 

《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》記者：近日，美國(guó)務(wù)卿蓬佩奧多次攻擊中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨和中國(guó)政治制度，稱要把中國(guó)人民的希望和夢(mèng)想同中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的希望和夢(mèng)想?yún)^(qū)分開(kāi)。中方對(duì)此有何評(píng)論？

China Daily: US Secretary of State Pompeo recently attacked the CPC and China’s political system on multiple occasions, saying that the Chinese people’s hopes and dreams should be distinguished from those of the CPC. Do you have any comment?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：今天是中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨成立99周年華誕。首先，祝偉大的中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨生日快樂(lè)！

Zhao Lijian: Today marks the 99th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China. I wish our Party a happy birthday.

 

中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨的夢(mèng)想和中國(guó)人民的夢(mèng)想是同一個(gè)，就是實(shí)現(xiàn)中華民族偉大復(fù)興。這個(gè)夢(mèng)想一定能實(shí)現(xiàn)。今天的中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨恰是風(fēng)華正茂。今天也恰恰是蓬佩奧之流特別難受的日子。蓬佩奧之流靠撒謊詆毀中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨，割斷中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨同中國(guó)人民的血肉聯(lián)系，是在做“白日夢(mèng)”。

The CPC and the Chinese people share the same dream: to realize the great renewal of the Chinese nation. And it will come true. Today the CPC is thriving with vigor, but it must be a very bitter day for Mr. Pompeo and his like. They attempt to sever the close bond between the CPC and the Chinese people by lying and smearing. It’s nothing but a pipe dream.

 

彭博社記者：根據(jù)香港國(guó)安法，中方將加強(qiáng)對(duì)在港外國(guó)新聞機(jī)構(gòu)和非政府組織的管理。具體將進(jìn)行怎樣的管理？在資質(zhì)許可、注冊(cè)等方面是否會(huì)有新的要求？

Bloomberg News: A follow-up on the national security law. In the law it says that China will strengthen the management and services of foreign media and NGOs in the city. We are wondering if you can explain what management these foreign organizations will face? For example will there be new licensing or registration requirements?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：中國(guó)政府維護(hù)國(guó)家主權(quán)、安全、發(fā)展利益的決心堅(jiān)定不移，貫徹“一國(guó)兩制”方針的決心堅(jiān)定不移，反對(duì)任何外部勢(shì)力干涉香港事務(wù)的決心堅(jiān)定不移。中方將繼續(xù)依法依規(guī)處理相關(guān)事務(wù)，提供應(yīng)有的服務(wù)。

Zhao Lijian: The Chinese government is firmly determined to uphold China’s sovereignty, security and development interests, to implement “one country, two systems” and to oppose interference in Hong Kong affairs by external elements. The Chinese side will continue handling relevant affairs in accordance with laws and regulations and offer necessary convenience.

 

巴基斯坦通訊社記者：據(jù)了解，中國(guó)和巴基斯坦成立了新冠肺炎疫情聯(lián)防聯(lián)控合作機(jī)制并舉行了首次視頻會(huì)議。你能否介紹更多情況？成立該合作機(jī)制有何考慮？

Associated Press of Pakistan: China and Pakistan established a joint cooperation mechanism on COVID-19 response and held the first video meeting under this mechanism. Do you have more details on that? What is China’s consideration for setting up this mechanism?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：6月30日，中國(guó)和巴基斯坦應(yīng)對(duì)新冠肺炎疫情聯(lián)防聯(lián)控合作機(jī)制正式成立并舉行首次視頻會(huì)議。雙方外交、衛(wèi)生、教育、海關(guān)等部門(mén)代表參會(huì)。中巴成立有關(guān)機(jī)制，旨在加強(qiáng)雙方各部門(mén)統(tǒng)籌溝通和協(xié)調(diào)，在疫情防控常態(tài)化背景下推進(jìn)各領(lǐng)域交流合作。雙方達(dá)成三點(diǎn)共識(shí)：

Zhao Lijian: On June 30, a China-Pakistan joint cooperation mechanism on COVID-19 response was officially established and the first video conference held. Representatives from the diplomatic, health, education and customs departments of the two sides attended the meeting. China and Pakistan have set up this mechanism to strengthen multi-agency coordination and communication between the two countries and promote exchanges and cooperation in various fields against the backdrop of the regular epidemic prevention and control. The meeting reached three consensus:

 

一是繼續(xù)采取精準(zhǔn)防控措施，堅(jiān)決控制疫情在本國(guó)擴(kuò)散或反彈，阻斷跨境傳播。二是繼續(xù)深化防疫合作，加強(qiáng)抗疫經(jīng)驗(yàn)分享，中方將繼續(xù)根據(jù)巴方需要提供力所能及的支持和幫助。三是繼續(xù)在做好防疫的前提下保障人員往來(lái)和經(jīng)貿(mào)合作，照顧好對(duì)方國(guó)家的留學(xué)生和僑民，確保中巴經(jīng)濟(jì)走廊建設(shè)順利推進(jìn)。

First, we will continue to take targeted measures to resolutely control the spread of the epidemic or its resurgence in our respective countries and to stop cross-border transmission. Second, we will continue to deepen cooperation and experience-sharing in fighting COVID-19. China will continue to do its best to provide support and assistance according to Pakistan’s needs. Third, we should continue to promote personnel exchanges and economic and trade cooperation on the premise of effective quarantine measures, be a good host to each other’s students and nationals, and ensure smooth progress of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor.

 

中巴是全天候戰(zhàn)略合作伙伴。疫情發(fā)生后，巴基斯坦總統(tǒng)阿爾維在中國(guó)抗疫關(guān)鍵時(shí)刻率團(tuán)訪華，體現(xiàn)了對(duì)中方的堅(jiān)定支持，巴方還向中方提供物資援助；中方也根據(jù)巴方需要，通過(guò)政府、軍隊(duì)、企業(yè)、社會(huì)組織等各種渠道提供物資援助，派遣抗疫醫(yī)療專家組，舉行抗疫視頻會(huì)議，盡最大努力支援巴方抗疫，詮釋了兩國(guó)同舟共濟(jì)、守望相助的命運(yùn)共同體內(nèi)涵。我們希望雙方以成立聯(lián)防聯(lián)控機(jī)制為契機(jī)，進(jìn)一步形成抗疫合力，早日戰(zhàn)勝疫情。

China and Pakistan are all-weather strategic partners. After the outbreak of COVID-19, Pakistani President Alvi led a delegation to China at a critical moment in our fight, demonstrating firm support. Pakistan has also mobilized the whole country to provide material assistance to China. In response to Pakistan’s needs, China has also provided material assistance through the government, military, enterprises and social organizations, sent medical experts and held video conferences to do its best to help Pakistan fight the epidemic. This demonstrates that the two countries, standing together through thick and thin, are a community with a shared future. We hope that the two sides will take the establishment of this mechanism as an opportunity to further join forces against COVID-19 and defeat the virus at an early date.

 

鳳凰衛(wèi)視記者：第一個(gè)問(wèn)題，在聯(lián)合國(guó)人權(quán)理事會(huì)上，包括法國(guó)、英國(guó)、德國(guó)在內(nèi)的27國(guó)共同呼吁中國(guó)政府重新考慮香港國(guó)安法，稱該法威脅香港自由。香港國(guó)安法公布實(shí)施是否會(huì)在未來(lái)一段時(shí)間影響中國(guó)和這些國(guó)家的關(guān)系？第二個(gè)問(wèn)題，美國(guó)聯(lián)邦通信委員會(huì)正式宣布將華為和中興列為美國(guó)國(guó)家安全威脅。中方對(duì)此有何回應(yīng)？

Phoenix TV: I have two questions. First, at the UN Human Rights Council meeting, 27 countries including France, the UK and Germany called on China to reconsider the national security legislation in Hong Kong, which they alleged was threatening Hong Kong’s freedom. Does the foreign ministry believe that the promulgation and implementation of the law will affect China’s relations with these countries in the foreseeable future? Second, the Federal Communications Commission announced that it has released orders issuing final designations of Huawei and ZTE as companies posing a national security threat. What is your response?

 

趙立堅(jiān)：關(guān)于第一個(gè)問(wèn)題，6月30日，在人權(quán)理事會(huì)第44屆會(huì)議上，英國(guó)等少數(shù)西方國(guó)家，就涉港等問(wèn)題攻擊誣蔑中方。當(dāng)場(chǎng)有53個(gè)國(guó)家在人權(quán)理事會(huì)做共同發(fā)言，支持中國(guó)涉港政策，敦促有關(guān)方面停止利用涉港問(wèn)題干涉中國(guó)內(nèi)政，人心向背，不言自明。少數(shù)西方國(guó)家的反華表演遭到失敗。

Zhao Lijian: On your first question, at the 44th regular session of the Human Rights Council on June 30, the UK, together with a small number of western countries, made unwarranted accusations against China on issues related to Hong Kong and others. Then and there, 53 countries voiced their support in a joint statement to China’s policies regarding Hong Kong, urging the relevant countries to stop using these matters to interfere in China’s internal affairs. It is pretty clear who enjoys popular support. The anti-China show staged by a handful of western countries ended in a fiasco.

 

需要強(qiáng)調(diào)的是，有關(guān)國(guó)家的人權(quán)記錄并不光彩，根本沒(méi)有資格對(duì)其他國(guó)家指手畫(huà)腳。我們奉勸他們好好反省一下自己，停止在人權(quán)問(wèn)題上搞政治化和雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，停止以人權(quán)為借口干涉別國(guó)內(nèi)政。他們應(yīng)認(rèn)清形勢(shì)，順應(yīng)潮流，真正為國(guó)際人權(quán)事業(yè)健康發(fā)展做些好事和實(shí)事。

It must be pointed out that these countries are far from owning a good human rights record to boast and are certainly in no position to judge others on this front. We urge them to reflect on their own problems, stop politicizing and appl