The Internet – and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why
commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by
restricting access to it – is making access to scientific results a reality.
?、貼o longer. The Internet – and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it – is making access to scientific results a reality.
?、赥he Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this.
?、跿he report, by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits.
?、蹷ut it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor.
參考譯文
?、俚@種行為將成為歷史了。許多基金會質(zhì)問為何商業(yè)刊物可以通過限制科研成果的使用從政府資助的研究項(xiàng)目中獲利,這種壓力和網(wǎng)絡(luò)的發(fā)展使免費(fèi)使用科研成果變成現(xiàn)實(shí)。
?、诮?jīng)濟(jì)合作與發(fā)展組織最近發(fā)表報(bào)告評論了此舉的深遠(yuǎn)影響。
?、圻@篇由澳大利亞維多利亞大學(xué)的約翰?豪斯和經(jīng)合組織的格萊漢姆?維克利共同撰寫的報(bào)告讓那些獲取了巨大利潤的出版商讀起來心情沉重。
?、艿囊饬x并不僅至于此,它還表明目前科學(xué)研究中一個(gè)關(guān)鍵要素發(fā)生了改變。