GRE寫作官方題庫高頻ARGUMENT題目滿分范文分享：the usefulness of frequent homework assignments

　　The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no more than two or three days per week. Despite receiving less frequent homework assignments, Marlee students earn better grades overall and are less likely to be required to repeat a year of school than are students in Sanlee. These results call into question the usefulness of frequent homework assignments. Most likely the Marlee students have more time to concentrate on individual assignments than do the Sanlee students who have homework every day. Therefore teachers in our high schools should assign homework no more than twice a week.

　　Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

　　滿分范文賞析

　　The speaker argues that if the state board of education reduced the frequency of homework assigned, performance overall would improve. To support this assertion the speaker cites a statewide survey of math and science teachers. According to the survey, students in the Marlee district, who are assigned homework no more than once per week, achieve better grades and are less likely to repeat a school year than students in the Sanlee district, who are assigned homework every night. The evidence presented provides little credible support for the speaker's assertion.

　　【此段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument開頭段結(jié)構(gòu)，即：C – E - F的開頭結(jié)構(gòu)，首句概括原文的C(Conclusion)。接下來的一句話概括了原文為了支持他的結(jié)論所引用的E(Evidence)。最后尾句中給出開頭段到正文段的過渡句，指出原文在邏輯上存在F(Flaw)。

　　【此段功能】

　　本段作為Argument開頭段，具體功能就在發(fā)起攻擊。首先，概括原文的結(jié)論：如果state board減少留作業(yè)的頻率，學(xué)生表現(xiàn)會提高。接下來分別列舉了原文為了支持這個(gè)結(jié)論引用的證據(jù)：一個(gè)在關(guān)于math和science teacher的全州調(diào)查。一周兩次作業(yè)Marlee(以后簡稱M)區(qū)比每天都有作業(yè)Sanlee(以后簡稱S)區(qū)成績和合格率要高。論據(jù)的歸納用于鋪墊出正文段的具體攻擊。最后點(diǎn)出原文存在邏輯錯(cuò)誤，引出后面的分析。

　　To begin with, the survey suffers from two statistical issues, either of which renders the survey's results unreliable. First, the speaker relies on statistics from only two districts but it is entirely possible that these two districts are not representative of the state's school districts overall. Second, the survey involved only math and science teachers. Yet the speaker draws a broad recommendation for all teachers based on the survey's results.

　　【此段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument正文段結(jié)構(gòu)，即：概括第一個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤的錯(cuò)誤類型和原文犯錯(cuò)位置，接下來給出合理的理由和他因來反駁原文。

　　【此段功能】

　　本段作為正文第一段，攻擊文章犯的主要邏輯錯(cuò)誤：調(diào)查類錯(cuò)誤。作者認(rèn)為原文所引用的調(diào)查在調(diào)查對象數(shù)量上和質(zhì)量上都存在問題。首先，只有兩個(gè)district，很可能不representative。其次，調(diào)查只包括 math and science teachers，而建議中提到的是all teacher，所以不合理。

　　Additionally, the speaker's recommendation relies on the assumption that the amount of homework assigned to students is the only possible reason for the comparative academic performance between students in the two districts. Perhaps there are other reasons. For example, maybe Sanlee teachers are stricter graders then Marlee teachers. Or perhaps Sanlee teachers are less effective than Marlee teachers, and therefore Sanlee students would perform more poorly regardless of homework schedule. In short, in order to properly conclude that fewer homework assignments results in better academic performance, the speaker must first rule out all other possible explanations for the disparity in academic performance between the two districts.

　　【此段結(jié)構(gòu)】

　　本段采用了標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的Argument正文段結(jié)構(gòu)，即：概括第二個(gè)邏輯錯(cuò)誤的錯(cuò)誤類型和原文犯錯(cuò)位置，接下來給出合理的理由和他因來反駁原文。

　　【此段功能】

　　本段作為正文第二段，攻擊文章犯的主要邏輯錯(cuò)誤：因果類錯(cuò)誤。原文中建議在“作業(yè)量是影響學(xué)生表現(xiàn)的唯一原因”的基礎(chǔ)上提出的。而作者認(rèn)為可能會有其他影響學(xué)習(xí)表現(xiàn)的原因。例如，S區(qū)的老師比M取得嚴(yán)格導(dǎo)致S區(qū)學(xué)生表現(xiàn)不如M區(qū)，或是S區(qū)的學(xué)生在homework schedule下perform more poorly。最后，作者提出必須排除其他因素的影響才能下結(jié)論。