Ravitch’s latest book, Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms, traces the roots of anti-intellectualism in our schools, concluding they are anything but a counterbalance to the American distaste for intellectual pursuits.
?、佟癝chools have always been in a society where practical is more important than intellectual,” says education writer Diane Ravitch.
?、凇癝chools could be a counterbalance.”
?、跼avitch’s latest book, Left Back: A Century of Failed School Reforms, traces the roots of anti-intellectualism in our schools, concluding they are anything but a counterbalance to the American distaste for intellectual pursuits.
參考譯文:
?、?觀點:分1)“學??偸翘幱谝粋€實踐比知識更為重要的社會中?!?
②(建議:分2)教育作家黛安?拉維奇說,“學校本來可以成為一種平衡?!?
?、?論點:總)拉維奇的新書《落后:一個世紀以來學校改革的失敗》探究了美國學校里反才智主義的根源,書中的結論是,學校根本無法扭轉美國人對追求才智的厭惡。