做吃貨，得幸福？

做吃貨，得幸福？

對好些北歐孩子來說，成長教會他們的是：“食物是難以忍受的東西”。柏林墻的倒塌促進(jìn)了全球化，而全球化會改善食物的口味，更好的食物則增加了人們的幸福指數(shù)。在一些“恨不得與美食為敵”的國家，吃貨也越來越多了，難怪在這些地方，各國風(fēng)味餐館和美食節(jié)目如雨后春筍一樣出現(xiàn)。

測試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識：

bland/tedious 乏味的

ethnic food 民族風(fēng)味菜

dour 嚴(yán)厲的，冷酷的

epitomise 典型代表

Amartya Sen 印度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家，諾獎得主阿瑪?shù)賮啞ど?

tandoori 唐杜里烹飪法，用泥爐炭火烹飪食物，已成為印度美食的著名做法

foodie 美食家，吃貨

rhapsodize 創(chuàng)作狂想曲

burrito bowl 墨西哥沙拉

toddle 東倒西歪地走路

閱讀即將開始，建議您計算一下閱讀整篇文章所用時間，并對照我們在文章最后給出的參考值來估算您的閱讀速度。

An everyday taste of happiness

By Simon Kuper

‘The fastest-growing demographic category from Britain to China today is ‘cheese bores’’

* * *

Twenty years ago I was hanging around a friend’s kitchen as dinnertime approached. “Let me cook for you,” he offered. “I don’t want to put you to any trouble,” I said. “No trouble at all,” he replied, and in one graceful movement he leaned back in his chair, lifted a tin of baked beans from the shelf above his head, emptied them into a saucepan and turned on the gas. That was dinner.

To grasp how daily life in most western countries has improved in recent decades, food is the perfect case study. True, we have all got fatter. True, we eat too much processed stuff. True, with food prices rising and incomes falling since 2007, poor people can barely afford enough to eat. And yet for most westerners, tastier food now provides everyday happiness to a degree unimaginable when I was growing up.

Back then, most Europeans and North Americans ate bland food daily. Going to a restaurant was a rare treat. There was little ethnic food around – certainly no sushi in the supermarket. A friend of mine raised in a small Dutch town in the 1970s recalls that whereas all their neighbours ate meat and potatoes every evening, his family were considered snobs because they ate meat and rice.

A few mothers and grandmothers produced wonderful home cooking, the stuff of nostalgia today. But most northern European children grew up regarding meals as something to endure. To quote the hysterical English schoolmaster in Pink Floyd’s album The Wall (1979): “If you don’t eat yer meat, you can’t have any pudding! How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat yer meat?”

In those postwar decades, attitudes to most goods were utilitarian: nobody needed sensory pleasures. A woman from Gillingham, in Kent, told me that her childhood was made less happy by the ugly surroundings. Tedious eating had the same effect.

Food was possibly even dourer in communist Europe. The summer after the Berlin Wall fell, I lodged with a family in an east German village. Every evening we had pork, potatoes and beer. It got boring within a week – let alone a lifetime.

No wonder East Germans craved the exotic. In 1966 Rolf Anschütz, a restaurateur in a small Thuringian town who had never been to Japan, began serving Japanese food. (You’d have thought that East Germany lagged in exotic cuisine but, in fact, London in 1966 had zero Japanese or Thai restaurants.) By 1989, when the Wall fell, several hundred thousand East Germans had eaten Anschütz’s Japanese meals.

The fall of the Wall accelerated globalisation, and globalisation tends to improve cooking. Our food has kept getting more exotic. The number of Indian restaurants in Britain, for instance, has gone from 1,200 in 1970 to about 9,000 today. (Indian food, incidentally, epitomises globalisation: chilli reached India from Portugal, tandoori from west Asia, and curry powder, bizarrely, from England, writes Amartya Sen.) Gradually, more westerners came to regard food as more than just fuel. On April 14 1999, Jamie Oliver presented his first cookery show on BBC television. A new generation of “foodies” was born.

The word conjures up images of bearded Brooklynites queueing at food trucks. The “food renaissance” is indeed linked to class, and therefore encourages status displays: the fastest-growing demographic category from Britain to China today is “cheese bores”.

However, tastier eating isn’t only an elite phenomenon. Enjoying food doesn’t have to mean buying ￡25 chickens or banging on about Amazonian vegetables. Great masses of people now watch cookery shows on TV. They don’t all then cook the dishes but they must be influenced. Often they consume the foods in simplified or snack forms: in coffee shops, or as ready-made supermarket meals. There’s even a “fresh fast food” phenomenon. Recent TV commercials for Taco Bell in the US, for instance, feature the celebrity chef Lorena Garcia rhapsodising about “beautiful ingredients” while preparing a “burrito bowl” in her kitchen. This sort of thing is easy to mock but these foods are probably tastier than, say, the Wonder Bread that used to be an American staple.

Immigration is bringing good ethnic foods even to poorer neighbourhoods. And until the current spike in prices, food had been getting cheaper for decades. Americans on average now spend just a 10th of their disposable income on food, says the US Department of Agriculture. That is around the lowest level in human history. Most westerners can now afford to think about food as a source of everyday happiness.

I live in Paris, where this attitude has been taken for granted for centuries. Every lunchtime I toddle to one of dozens of restaurants around my work-flat, and sit down alone to a two-course meal. Often it’s the highlight of my day. Once, over dinner with expat friends, we debated the question: would we stay in Paris if the food was bad? Nah, we concluded. I may never leave this city, so the quest for happiness through food has shaped my life.

請根據(jù)你所讀到的文章內(nèi)容，完成以下自測題目：

1. Many Europeans ate boring food, which of the following nation is not among them?

a. The Dutch.

b. The Nordic.

c. The British.

d. The French.

2. There used to be few ethnic food restaurants in some western countries, why?

a. The income level was low in the post-war ear.

b. Few people had ever been abroad.

c. People held a utilitarian view toward food.

d. Food processing industry was not yet developed.

3. Why tastier eating is not only for the elites?

a. Food price/income level is low enough.

b. Cookery shows are everywhere.

c. Immigration is making ethnic foods reachable.

d. All of above.

4. What do we know about the writer, according to the article?

a. He likes Paris, especially its food.

b. Gastronomy is his source of happiness.

c. He likes cooking himself.

d. Indian food is his favorite.

[1] 答案d. The French.

解釋：70年代的荷蘭人竟然覺得別人吃米飯是“勢利小人”，北歐的很多孩子成長過程中就認(rèn)為吃飯是一件必須要忍受的事。

[2] 答案c. People held a utilitarian view toward food.

解釋：食品能果腹就行了，nobody needed sensory pleasures，是他們當(dāng)時的觀念。事實上，歐洲人的收入仍是很高的，而不講究飯菜質(zhì)量則是出了名的。那個從未出過國的東德人開了日本餐館，馬上門庭若市。D與飯館無關(guān)。

[3] 答案d. All of above.

解釋：ABC都正確。

[4] 答案b. Gastronomy is his source of happiness.

解釋：從他和朋友的討論可以看出，如果沒有美食，他們絕不會住在巴黎的。CD文章都未提到。