杰米·斯皮爾斯要求駁回布蘭妮的經濟訴訟并取消即將進行的審判

The legal disputes between Britney Spears and her father, Jamie, continue.
布蘭妮·斯皮爾斯和她父親杰米之間的法律糾紛仍在繼續(xù)。

On Tuesday, April 30, Jamie, 71, filed a motion for summary judgment pertaining to financial objections from the 42-year-old singer’s previous conservatorship in an effort to avoid proceeding with a trial, per court documents obtained by PEOPLE.
根據《人物》獲得的法庭文件，4月30日星期二，71歲的杰米就42歲歌手之前的監(jiān)護權提出的財務異議提出了簡易判決動議，以避免進行審判。

"Jamie brings this motion because there are no triable issues of material fact and Jamie is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Britney’s Objections,” reads the filing. 
“杰米提出這個動議是因為沒有可審判的重大事實問題，杰米有權根據法律對布蘭妮的反對意見作出判決，”文件中寫道。

He is seeking a summary judgment regarding Britney’s objections — compensation to Tri Star Sports & Entertainment and payment of attorneys’ fees to Sidley Austin LLP — both of which were made while Jamie was her conservator.
他正在尋求對布蘭妮的異議作出簡易判決——向三星體育娛樂公司賠償，并向盛德律師事務所支付律師費——這兩項都是在杰米擔任她的監(jiān)護人時做出的。

Along with Britney’s two objections, Jamie is seeking a judgment regarding her three requests for more information: accounting compensation to Tri Star Sports & Entertainment, payment of rent for storage space and investment valuation differences. 
除了布蘭妮的兩項反對意見外，杰米還要求法院就她提出的三項要求做出判決:向三星體育娛樂公司支付會計賠償、支付存儲空間租金和投資估值差異。

“No triable disputes of material fact exist and there is no basis to waste the Court’s time and resources on a trial of narrow objections that fail as a matter of law. Accordingly, Jamie is entitled to summary judgment (or adjudication) on each of the five issues raised in Britney’s November 6, 2020 filing,” per the court filing.
“不存在可審判的重大事實爭端，也沒有理由將法院的時間和資源浪費在對在法律上失敗的狹隘異議的審判上。因此，杰米有權對布蘭妮在2020年11月6日提交的文件中提出的五個問題中的每一個問題進行即決判決(或裁決)。”

As a result, Jamie wants a judge to overrule all of the singer’s objections and remove their "May 13, 2024 trial off the calendar.” 
因此，杰米希望法官駁回這位歌手的所有反對意見，并將他們“2024年5月13日的審判從日程表上刪除”。

Additionally, the court documents state that Jamie wants the twelfth accounting approved, alleging that Britney's objections "fail as a matter of law" because Jamie "acted within the scope of his authority as conservator when approving the compensation at issue." Jamie’s counsel also claims that in addition to Britney’s current objections, it is too late for the singer to object to other compensations.
此外，法庭文件表明，杰米希望第十二會計批準，聲稱布蘭妮的反對“在法律上是失敗的”，因為杰米“在批準有爭議的賠償時，是在他作為保管人的權力范圍內行事的”。杰米的律師還聲稱，除了布蘭妮目前的反對之外，這位歌手反對其他賠償已經太晚了。