2020考研英語(yǔ)閱讀理解精讀100篇：Unit 48

Unit 48

In 1966 Allen and Beatrice Gardner, two psychologists at the University of Nevada in Reno, had a bright idea. They were interested in the evolution of language and the linguistic capabilities of great apes. Previous attempts to teach chimpanzees to talk had ended in failure and the matter was considered by most people to be closed. But the Gardners realised that speech and language are not the same thing. Many deaf people, for example, are unable to speak but are perfectly able to communicate by gestures that have all the attributes and sophistication of spoken language. Given the very different anatomies of the human and chimpanzee larynx, the Gardners suspected that previous experiments had failed because chimps are physically incapable of speech.

They therefore decided to try teaching a chimpanzee to sign in the way that deaf people do. And their chosen subject, a female chimp named Washoe after the county in which the university campus is located, proved an adept pupil. Though there is still debate about whether what Washoe learned was really equivalent to human language, there is no doubt that she learned a lot of words. She now has a vocabulary of about 200. All of this, however, raises a second question. If Washoe and her successors can learn a complex and arbitrary vocabulary of gestures from people, do they have such vocabularies naturally? To examine that possibility Amy Pollick and Frans de Waal, of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, have looked at gestures and expressions in chimpanzees and their cousins, bonobos.

Signalling by facial and vocal expression is ubiquitous among primates. Signalling by gesture is confined to the great apes. The researchers’ hypothesis was that the meaning of expressions has been hard-wired by evolution whereas the meaning of gestures is learnt and, at least to some extent, is arbitrary. If that were true, particular sorts of facial and vocal expression would occur only in particular contexts, and that this would be consistent across groups and even species. The same gestures, by contrast, would be used in different contexts.

The researchers found exactly what they expected. Expressions（“silent bared teeth”, “relaxed open mouth”, “pant hoot” and so on） almost always occurred in the same contexts in different groups and different species. Gestures （“hard touch”, “reach outside”, “slap ground” etc） did not. Half of the gestures Dr Pollick and Dr de Waal regularly observed seemed to have completely different meanings in the two species. Moreover, even within a single group, the meaning of a gesture could vary with context, almost as tone of voice can vary the meaning of a human’s spoken word.

It is also worth remembering that gesture is still a crucial part of human language, even for those with normal hearing. The old joke that the way to render an Italian speechless is to tie his hands together has a kernel of truth in it. Evolution does not come up with complicated structures in a single leap. They are built up step by step. This study suggests that the step of speech may have been built on mental attributes that were acquired millions of years ago when the ancestors of apes and men began to wave meaningfully at each other.

注（1）：本文選自Economist；

注（2）：本文習(xí)題命題模仿對(duì)象為2002年真題Text 4。

1. From the first paragraph, we learn that _______.

A) chimpanzees do not have the capability of mastering a language

B) the Gardners found a new idea to develop the chimpanzee experiment

C) previous experiments failed because they merely focused on chimpanzees’ vocal ability

D) chimpanzees can use gestures as well as blind people

2. Which of the following statements is TRUE according to the text?

A) Washoe was able to develop an entire system of signs and gestures of her own.

B) The vocabulary Washoe learnt is not similar to human language.

C) The Washoe experiment has enlightened further research.

D) The Gardners found that Washoe naturally has her vocabulary of gestures.

3. According to the author, gestures are different from facial and vocal expressions in that _______.

A) gestures are more complicated

B) gestures are limited to a certain type of species

C) facial and vocal expressions are more complicated

D) there is no difference between them

4. Which of the following best defines the word “hard-wired” （Line 3, Paragraph 3）?

A) Fixed.

B) Changed.

C) Taught.

D) Made.

5. The Pollick and de Waal research probably indicates that _______.

A) the apes are the closest species to human being

B) people with normal hearing do not really need to resort to gestures

C) the great apes naturally have the ability to use gestures

D) human language may have developed from signs and gestures

篇章剖析

本文是一篇關(guān)于研究大猩猩語(yǔ)言能力的說(shuō)明文。第一、二段介紹了加德納夫婦的研究成果，并引出后兩位學(xué)者對(duì)倭黑猩猩的研究；第三、四段分別介紹了研究的假設(shè)和結(jié)果；最后一段進(jìn)一步闡述了手勢(shì)對(duì)于人類腦力思考進(jìn)化的影響。

詞匯注釋

psychologist /sa??k?l?d??st/ n. 心理學(xué)家

chimpanzee /?t??mp?n?zi?/ n. 黑猩猩

attribute /??tr?bj?t/ n. 屬性，品質(zhì)，特征

sophistication /s??f?st??ke???n/ n. 復(fù)雜，精致

anatomy /??n?t?mi/ n. 分解，解剖

larynx /?l?r??ks/ n. 【解】喉

adept /??dept/ adj. 熟練的，拿手的

successor /s?k?ses?/ n. 繼承者，接任者

bonobo /?b?un??b?u/ n. 倭黑猩猩

ubiquitous /ju??b?kw?t?s/ adj. 到處存在的，普遍存在的

primate /?pra?m?t/ n. 靈長(zhǎng)類的動(dòng)物

hard-wired /?ha?d?wa??d/ adj. 天生的

pant /p?nt/ n. 氣喘

hoot /hu?t/ vi. 大聲叫囂，鳴響

render /?rend?/ vt. 致使

難句突破

The researchers’ hypothesis was that the meaning of expressions has been hard-wired by evolution whereas the meaning of gestures is learnt and, at least to some extent, is arbitrary.

主體句式：The researchers’ hypothesis was that...

結(jié)構(gòu)分析：這個(gè)句子的難點(diǎn)在于that之后的這個(gè)賓語(yǔ)從句。從句以whereas為界可以分為兩個(gè)部分，其中后半個(gè)句子由whereas引導(dǎo)，與前半個(gè)句子為并列結(jié)構(gòu)。此外，at least to some extent是一個(gè)插入語(yǔ)，一定程度上干擾和混淆了is learnt和is arbitrary這兩個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)的并列關(guān)系。

句子譯文：研究者的假設(shè)是，表情的意義在長(zhǎng)期的進(jìn)化過(guò)程中已經(jīng)成為一種天生的能力，而手勢(shì)的意義是后天學(xué)成的，至少在一定程度上是任意的。

題目分析

1. B 推理題。文章第一段的主要內(nèi)容就是講述加德納夫婦對(duì)于大猩猩語(yǔ)言能力試驗(yàn)的新想法，因此答案為B。A選項(xiàng)的錯(cuò)誤原因在于大猩猩沒(méi)有說(shuō)話的能力，但是擁有語(yǔ)言能力，而兩者是不同的。C選項(xiàng)的錯(cuò)誤原因在于前人的研究雖然確實(shí)都把重點(diǎn)放在了大猩猩的說(shuō)話能力上，但其失敗的關(guān)鍵在于沒(méi)有區(qū)分語(yǔ)言能力和說(shuō)話能力這兩個(gè)不同的方面。D選項(xiàng)原文中并沒(méi)有提及。

2. C 細(xì)節(jié)題。文章第二段中指出，Washoe的成就使科學(xué)家們提出了新的問(wèn)題，并進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的研究，因此C選項(xiàng)正確。A選項(xiàng)的錯(cuò)誤原因在于Washoe并沒(méi)有發(fā)展出她自己的一套手勢(shì)系統(tǒng)，而是人類的語(yǔ)言系統(tǒng)。

3. B 細(xì)節(jié)題。文章第三段第一句話指出：“通過(guò)表情和聲音來(lái)發(fā)送信號(hào)的現(xiàn)象在靈長(zhǎng)類動(dòng)物中是普遍存在的。但只有大猩猩才能用手勢(shì)發(fā)送信號(hào)”，并不存在兩者哪個(gè)更加復(fù)雜的說(shuō)法。

4. A 語(yǔ)義題。從該詞所在句子的上下文中，可以理解其意思為：動(dòng)物的表情經(jīng)過(guò)了長(zhǎng)期的演化具有了固定的意義，成為了動(dòng)物一種天生的能力。因此A選項(xiàng)正確，其他幾項(xiàng)都不符合題意。

5. D 推理題。文章最后一段的最后一句話指出，人類祖先在使用手勢(shì)的時(shí)候很可能促使了腦部的發(fā)展，從而漸漸產(chǎn)生了語(yǔ)言能力，因此答案為D。C選項(xiàng)是該研究證實(shí)的結(jié)果，而不是其引申意義。

參考譯文

1966年，內(nèi)華達(dá)大學(xué)雷諾分校的兩名心理學(xué)家阿倫與比特里斯·加德納夫婦產(chǎn)生了一個(gè)聰明的想法。他們對(duì)于大猩猩語(yǔ)言的進(jìn)化和語(yǔ)言能力非常感興趣。前人曾試圖教黑猩猩說(shuō)話，但那些努力最終都以失敗告終，很多人認(rèn)為這個(gè)領(lǐng)域已經(jīng)沒(méi)有什么可以研究的了。但是加德納夫婦意識(shí)到說(shuō)話和語(yǔ)言并不是一件事情。比如說(shuō)，許多聾啞人不能說(shuō)話，但是他們卻能夠用手勢(shì)進(jìn)行充分的交流，這些手勢(shì)都包含了人類語(yǔ)言的那些特點(diǎn)和復(fù)雜性。由于人類和黑猩猩喉嚨的結(jié)構(gòu)不同，加德納夫婦認(rèn)為前人研究的失敗是因?yàn)楹谛尚缮砩暇蜔o(wú)法說(shuō)話。

因此，他們決定試著教一只黑猩猩如何使用聾啞人的手勢(shì)。他們選擇的研究對(duì)象是一個(gè)名為Washoe的雌性黑猩猩，Washoe是該大學(xué)校園所在縣的名稱，而這只猩猩是一個(gè)很在行的學(xué)生。盡管人們?nèi)栽跔?zhēng)論Washoe學(xué)會(huì)的到底能不能算人類語(yǔ)言，但是毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)她學(xué)會(huì)了很多詞匯。她現(xiàn)在的詞匯量約為200個(gè)單詞。所有這些都使人們提出了第二個(gè)問(wèn)題。如果Washoe和她的繼任者們能夠從人類那里學(xué)會(huì)復(fù)雜和任意詞匯的手勢(shì)，那么他們是不是天生就擁有這些詞匯呢？為了驗(yàn)證這種可能性，亞特蘭大埃默里大學(xué)的埃米·波利克和弗朗斯·德瓦爾對(duì)一些黑猩猩和他們的近親倭黑猩猩的手勢(shì)和表情進(jìn)行了研究。

通過(guò)表情和聲音來(lái)發(fā)送信號(hào)的現(xiàn)象在靈長(zhǎng)類動(dòng)物中是普遍存在的。但只有大猩猩才能用手勢(shì)發(fā)送信號(hào)。研究者的假設(shè)是，表情的意義在長(zhǎng)期的進(jìn)化過(guò)程中已經(jīng)成為一種天生的能力，而手勢(shì)的意義是后天學(xué)成的，至少在一定程度上是任意的。如果這個(gè)假設(shè)成立的話，那么各種特別的面部表情和聲音就只會(huì)在特殊的情境下出現(xiàn)，并且在物種群甚至是物種之間都是一致的。相反，同樣的手勢(shì)卻能夠在不同的情境下使用。

研究結(jié)果與預(yù)期的一致。不同的物種群以及物種之間都會(huì)在相同的情境下使用一些表情（“不出聲地張嘴露齒”、“放松地張嘴”、“高聲氣促”等），卻不會(huì)用相同的手勢(shì)（“硬碰”、“向外伸手”、“拍地”等）。波利克和德瓦爾博士規(guī)律性地觀察到的手勢(shì)中，有近一半在兩個(gè)物種之間具有幾乎完全不同的意義。此外，即使是在同一物種中，某一手勢(shì)的意義也可能在不同的情境下有所變化，就像人類說(shuō)話時(shí)用不同的聲調(diào)可以表示不同的意義那樣。

我們應(yīng)記住，手勢(shì)仍然是人類語(yǔ)言中一個(gè)至關(guān)重要的組成部分，特別是那些聽(tīng)覺(jué)正常的人。有一個(gè)老笑話說(shuō)，如果要讓一個(gè)意大利人閉嘴，那就把他的手綁起來(lái)，這個(gè)笑話有其道理所在。進(jìn)化的過(guò)程不會(huì)一步就達(dá)到復(fù)雜的結(jié)構(gòu)，而是一步一步演化過(guò)來(lái)的。該研究間接地說(shuō)明，當(dāng)幾百萬(wàn)年前猿和人類祖先開(kāi)始有意義地向彼此揮手的時(shí)候，這種腦力思考的特點(diǎn)就在一步步地向語(yǔ)言能力發(fā)展。