2016年12月大學(xué)英語六級閱讀練習(xí)(12)

　　University of York biologist Peter Mayhew recentlyfound that global warming might actually increasethe number of species on the planet，contrary toa previous report that higher temperatures meantfewer life forms—a report mat was his own.

　　In Mayhew’s initial 2008 study，low biodiversity among marine invertebrates(無脊椎動物)appeared to coincide with warmer temperatures on Earth over the last 520 million years.But Mayhew and his colleagues decided to reexamine their hypothesis，this time using datathat were“a fairer sample of the history of life.”砌this new collection of material.they found acomplete reversal of the relationship between species richness and temperature from whattheir previous paper argued：the number of different groups present in the fossil record washigher，rather than lower，durin9“greenhouse phases.”

　　Their previous findings rested on an assumption that fossil records can be taken torepresent biodiversity changes throughout history.Thisn’t necessarily the case.because thereare certain periods with higher.quality fossil samples.and some that are much more difficultto sample well.Aware of this bias.Mayhew’s team used data that standardized the number offossils examined throughout history and accounted for other variables like sea level changesthat might influence biodiversity in their new study to see if their old results would hold up.

　　Two years later，the results did not.But then why doesn't life increasingly emerge onEarth as our temperatures get warmer?

　　While the switch may prompt some to assert that climate change is not hazardous toliving creatures，Mayhew explained that the timescales in his team’s study are huge--over500million years--and therefore inappropriate for the shorter periods that we might look at ashumans concerned about global wanning.Many global warming concerns are focused on thenext century.He said——and the lifetime of a species is typically one to 10 million years.

　　“I do worry that these findings vill be used by the climate skeptic community tosay‘look.Climate warming is fine。he said.Not to mention the numerous other things weseem to do to create a storm of threats to biodiversity—think of what habitat(棲息地)destruction，overfishing，and pollution can do for a species’viability(生存力).Thosethings，Mayhew explained，give the organisms a far greater challenge in coping with climatechange than they would have had in the absence of humans.

　　“If we were to relax all these pressures on biodiversity and allow the world to recover overmillions of years in a warmer climate.then my prediction is it would be an improvement inbiodiversity，”he said.So it looks like we need to curb our reckless treatment of the planetfirst，if we want to eventually see a surge in the number of species on the planet astemperatures get warmer.We don't have 500 million years to wait.

　　1.What is the finding of Peter Mayhew’s recent study?

　　A.Higher temperature causes the low biodiversity of marine invertebrates.

　　B.Fossil record can represent a relatively believable history of life.

　　C.The number of fossils was higher during greenhouse phases.

　　D.Global warming might promote the richness of species on Earth.

　　2.What do we learn about Mayhew’s previous report?

　　A.It was based on his colleagues hypothesis about global warming.

　　B.It was contrary to what his team found in the recent study.

　　C.It was a complete reversal from his 2008 study about marine invertebrates.

　　D.It found evidence for the connections between biodiversity and temperature.

　　3.Why does Mayhew’s team use data that standardized the number of fossils?

　　A.They realize not all fossils can sample well to represent biodiversity changes.

　　B.They start to consider the variables that might influence biodiversity.

　　C.They want to check the previous findings with different research methods.

　　D.They believe sea level changes can lead to inaccurate fossil records.

　　4.Because of the huge timescales in his study，Mayhew believed .

　　A.global warming is not hazardous t0 1iving creatures in a short time

　　B.his study is not suitable to support short-term global warming

　　C.global warming concerns should be focused on in the next century

　　D.the lifetime of a species can be extended t0 10 million years

　　5.By“we don’t have 500 million years to wait”(Line 4，Para.6)，the author suggeststhat_____.

　　A.we have no enough time to allow the earth to recover from damages

　　B.we have no enough time to witness the evolution of a species

　　C.it’s urgent for humans to take steps to prevent global warming

　　D.it's necessary for humans to stop maltreatment of the planet

　　參考答案：

　　1.D)。本題考查彼得·梅休的最新研究成果。定位句指出，他發(fā)現(xiàn)氣候變暖可能使得地球上物種的數(shù)量增加，故答案為D)。

　　2.B)。本題考查對梅休之前研究報(bào)告結(jié)論的理解。定位句指出，在新收集的材料中，他們發(fā)現(xiàn)了與他們之前的論文所辯稱的一種物種豐富性與溫度間完全相反的關(guān)系，故答案為B)。

　　3.A)。本題考查梅休團(tuán)隊(duì)利用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化化石的原因。定位句指出，因?yàn)槟承┨囟ǖ臅r(shí)段有一些更高質(zhì)量的化石樣本，其中一些更難取出好的樣本。基于這一點(diǎn)，梅休團(tuán)隊(duì)在他們的新實(shí)驗(yàn)中利用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化個(gè)數(shù)并被歷史所檢測的化石數(shù)據(jù)，故本題答案為A)。

　　4.B)。本題考查梅休對于研究時(shí)間跨度太長的態(tài)度。定位句指出，梅休解釋他們團(tuán)隊(duì)的研究時(shí)標(biāo)很長，有5億多年，所以用于解釋人們關(guān)注的較短時(shí)間內(nèi)的全球變暖是不合適的，故答案為B)。

　　5.D)。