雅思寫作大作文高分范文：博物館是否應該收費

　　An increasing number of museums tend to charge admission fees from tourists rather than providing service free of charge. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

　　雅思寫作思路：

　　第一段：背景介紹

　　第二段：優(yōu)點：

　　1. 公平：不是每個納稅人都要為博物館做貢獻

　　2. 補充運營經費

　　3. 不會威脅其他獨立的競爭對手

　　第三段：缺點

　　1. 導致減少參觀者，影響文化和知識的傳播

　　2. 剝奪貧窮孩子的受教育機會

　　第四段：結論

　　建議措施：學生免費，貧窮家庭補助，免費的虛擬博物館

　　詞匯拓展：

　　Introduce 推行(政策)

　　Proposal 建議=suggestion n.

　　maintenance 維護 n.

　　expansion 擴大

　　grant 批準

　　residential building 住宅樓

　　Operation 運營

　　spending 支出=cost

　　security 安保

　　collection 收藏品

　　financial support 經濟支持

　　taxpayer 納稅人

　　admission 門票

　　compensate 補償

　　subsidy 津貼

　　substantially 非常=greatly

　　venue 地方=place

　　access 進入

　　vivid 生動的

　　presentation 展示

　　undermine 消弱=impair

　　inspiration 啟示

　　cultural heritage preservation 文化遺產保護

　　transmission 傳播

　　be deprived of 剝奪

　　Accordingly 因此=therefore

　　preference treatment 優(yōu)惠待遇

　　promising 有希望的

　　option 選擇=choice

　　well-off 貧窮的=poor

　　adverse impacts 負面影響

　　雅思寫作范文：

　　In many countries, museums used to be free for visitors to enter. But recently, admission fee is introduced due to a cut in funding from the government.

　　在許多國家，博物館過去是免費供游客進入的。但最近，由于政府削減了經費，錄取費用也開始增加。

　　There are reasons for such proposal. Firstly, charging admission keeps a museum run healthily because it provides museums some funding for maintenance and expansion. As we generally know, building a museum with special characters and functions costs substantially more money than an ordinary residential building. Operation spending including security, staff salary and enriching the collections also need constant financial support. If all this cost has to come from taxation, that would be unfair to some taxpayers who do not visit museums at all. Also charging admission can compensate publicly funded museums for cuts in subsidy granted by the government and do not drop their service quality and security. Meanwhile this would not threaten other independent competitors which rely on their income from entry fees.

　　這樣的建議是有原因的。首先，博物館的收費讓博物館保持健康，因為它為博物館提供了一些資金用于維護和擴建。眾所周知，建造一個具有特殊人物和功能的博物館比普通的住宅建筑要貴得多。包括安保、員工工資和豐富收藏品在內的運營支出也需要持續(xù)的資金支持。如果所有這些成本都來自于稅收，那么對于那些根本不去參觀博物館的納稅人來說，這是不公平的。此外，收取門票的費用可以補償政府資助的博物館減少政府補貼的費用，也不會降低其服務質量和安全性。與此同時，這也不會威脅到其他依賴收入來源的獨立競爭對手。

　　However, some people disagree with charging entry because they are convinced of some adverse impacts on the society. It is true that a museum is a venue about learning and enjoying as well. It is the access to vivid presentation of knowledge and local culture and history, and charging admission would decrease the number of visits, hence undermining the inspiration for knowledge and cultural heritage preservation and transmission. Another concern about charging admission of a museum is that a museum, as an important educational resource, may lose its educational function because some students in a disadvantaged position would be deprived of a museum tour.

　　然而，有些人不同意收取費用，因為他們相信對社會有一些不利的影響。的確，博物館是一個學習和享受的場所。這是對知識和當?shù)匚幕蜌v史的生動展示的途徑，而收取門票將減少參觀人數(shù)，從而破壞了知識和文化遺產保護和傳播的靈感。對博物館收費的另一個擔憂是，博物館作為重要的教育資源，可能會失去其教育功能，因為一些處于弱勢地位的學生將被剝奪參觀博物館的機會。

　　In conclusion, although free access to a museum can promote culture and education, it leads to financial pressure on a museum. Accordingly students should be given a preference treatment and this can be effective with the government’s constant funding for student museum visit. Adults should be charged of admission to a museum. A virtual museum can be another promising option for those less well-off because it is much cheaper to build and run, and therefore can be provided free.

　　總之，盡管免費參觀博物館可以促進文化和教育，但它卻給博物館帶來了財政壓力。因此，學生應該得到優(yōu)待，這可以在政府持續(xù)資助學生博物館參觀的情況下有效。成年人應該被控告進入博物館。對于那些不太富裕的人來說，虛擬博物館可能是另一個有前途的選擇，因為建造和運營成本更低，因此可以免費提供。