2017雅思寫作范文：控制媒體暴力
政府應(yīng)該控制電影電視上暴力鏡頭的數(shù)量，為了減少社會(huì)暴力犯罪。你在多大程度上同意或不同意這個(gè)問題?
思路解析：
應(yīng)該控制1：暴力電影和鏡頭是精神毒藥。它們包含太多的刺激的，煽動(dòng)性的情結(jié)，這讓觀眾變得富有攻擊性。
應(yīng)該控制2：暴力電影中的電影明星樹立了負(fù)面榜樣，他們給年輕人傳達(dá)了一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤的觀念，即暴力是一種合適的方式來解決一切社會(huì)問題，這在年輕人中培養(yǎng)了一種對于犯罪的崇拜。
不應(yīng)該控制：暴力鏡頭本身就能反應(yīng)社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)，這是對于人們的一種教育，也讓他們對于可能在身邊出現(xiàn)的暴力進(jìn)行防范。
參考范文：
Nowadays, many people argue that the government should control the amount of violence in films and on television, in order to reduce social crimes. In my view, this assertion is partially wise, and my reasons would be explored as below.
Admittedly, there are many good reasons for controlling the amount of violence in films and on television. First, violent films and television are mental poisons for the audience It is because they contains numerous of erotic, corrupt and provoking episode, with long exposure to which, viewers might become aggressive and eccentric. In addition, violence contents set negative role models for young viewers, especially the youth. Activities like fighting, shooting or killing done by movie stars send teenagers a wrong message that violence is an effective or even essential solution to all troubles. Therefore, these youngsters with immature minds begin to admire violence and disrespect social rules, which leads to the increasing of the juvenile delinquents. According to the analysis above, it is clear that the measure of limiting violent information on media should be encouraged, for the reason that it can directly cut off the access to those illegal and evil behaviors and thoughts, thus keeping people from imitating them.
Advocates claim that the practice of controlling the amount of violence in mass media is a brazen violation of the people's basic right to know the truth of the world. For example, some films contain some violence, but they reflect the things happened around us. Rather than producing negative effects on audience, to some extent, these films educate them. Furthermore, violence in films or on television programs cultivates people's senses of crisis and responsibility, which makes ordinary people and police work better for public security. Consequently, it is irresponsible and foolish to blame the media for violence in our society.
As far as I am concern, I strongly believe that the amount of violence in films and TV should be controlled. At the same time, we cannot deny the advantages brought by them. And the best policy is to develop the merits of the violent films and television, while grading and filtering them.
