劍橋雅思考官寫作9分范文:交通與污染

本范文來自劍橋雅思，是近乎9分的存在。江湖有言：熟讀劍雅一百遍，不會作文也會吟。你是拿來無腦背誦也好，一篇一篇品評研究也好，照著葫蘆畫瓢也好，都是對你的寫作大有裨益的。個人建議：重點學(xué)習(xí)考官是如何入題，如何立論，如何論述，如何結(jié)尾，還有如何承接過渡的?？傊褪菍W(xué)習(xí)這些范文的骨架是如何搭建的。

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective?抬高油價是解決交通和污染問題的最好方式。

參考范文：

This is no doubt that traffic and pollution from vehicles have become huge problems, both in cities and on motorways everywhere. Solving these problems is likely to need more than a simple rise in the price of petrol.

While it is undeniable that private car use is one of the main causes of the increase in traffic and pollution, higher fuel costs are unlikely to limit the number of drivers for long. As this policy would also affect the cost of public transport, it would be very unpopular with everyone who needs to travel on the roads. But there are various other measures that could be implemented that would have a huge effect on these problems.

I think to tackle the problem of pollution, cleaner fuels need to be developed. The technology is already available to produce electric cars that would be both quieter and cleaner to use. Persuading manufactures and travelers to adopt this new technology would be more effective strategy for improving air quality, especially in cities.

However, traffic congestion will not be solved by changing the type of private vehicle people can use. To do this, we need to improve the choice of public transport services available to travelers. For example, if sufficient sky trains and underground trains systems were built and effectively maintained in our major cities, then traffic on the roads would be dramatically reduced. Long-distance train and coach services should be made attractive and affordable alternatives to driving your own car for long journeys.

In conclusion, I think that long-term traffic and pollution reductions would depend on educating the public to use public transport more, and on governments using public money to construct and run efficient systems.(283)