蘋果大規(guī)模下架中國應(yīng)用引發(fā)不滿情緒加劇
蘋果(Apple)對(duì)待開發(fā)者的方式正日益在中國引起怒火，第二批應(yīng)用開發(fā)者也舉報(bào)了這家iPhone制造商。
“Apple used to have a good reputation,” said Chen Wen, a dating-app developer based in Chengdu, western China. “But their recent behaviour, such as unequal treatment of Chinese developers, has left many unsatisfied.”
“過去蘋果聲譽(yù)很好，”中國西部城市成都的交友應(yīng)用開發(fā)人員陳文(音譯)說，“但他們最近的行為，比如對(duì)中國開發(fā)者的不公正待遇，讓很多人不滿。”
Apple started a worldwide crackdown on what it saw as illegitimate apps earlier this year, removing more than 1m Chinese apps from the company’s App Store in the year to date, according to the tech research firm ASO 100.
技術(shù)研究公司ASO 100的數(shù)據(jù)顯示，今年早些時(shí)候，蘋果開始在全球范圍打擊其認(rèn)為不合法的應(yīng)用，今年迄今為止，蘋果已從其應(yīng)用商店(App Store)下架逾100萬個(gè)中國應(yīng)用。
Apple routinely launches mass clean-ups of its App Store, and it is not unusual for the group to delete tens of thousands of programs at one time. However, it has cut almost 200,000 more Chinese apps than those from the US so far this year.
蘋果會(huì)定期對(duì)應(yīng)用商店進(jìn)行大規(guī)模清理，一舉下架數(shù)萬應(yīng)用并不少見。然而，今年迄今為止，其下架的中國應(yīng)用要比下架的美國應(yīng)用多出近20萬個(gè)。
Apple declined to comment on the specific volume of its app deletions in China. ASO 100 says its data are compiled in partnership with Apple.
蘋果拒絕就其在中國下架應(yīng)用的具體數(shù)目置評(píng)。ASO 100表示其數(shù)據(jù)是與蘋果合作編制的。
Last month, a Beijing-based law firm, Dare & Sure, filed the first Chinese antitrust case against Apple on behalf of 28 developers. Their case has now expanded to cover more than 50 developers. Now a second law firm in Chengdu, western China is alleging similar mistreatment on behalf of 23 more developers.
上月，北京達(dá)曉律師事務(wù)所(Dare & Sure)代表28家應(yīng)用程序開發(fā)商對(duì)蘋果發(fā)起了反壟斷舉報(bào)，這在國內(nèi)尚屬首次。目前，參與舉報(bào)的開發(fā)商已經(jīng)擴(kuò)大到逾50家?，F(xiàn)在，成都的另一家律師事務(wù)所代表另外23家開發(fā)商發(fā)起類似舉報(bào)，指控蘋果的不公正待遇。
“Our common goal in initiating this collective action is to fight for fair business relationships for China’s developers,” wrote Sichuan Fa Ye Law Firm in a regulatory complaint filed last week to China’s commercial and economic regulators.
上周，四川法也律師事務(wù)所在提交國家工商總局的行政投訴中寫道，發(fā)起的相關(guān)集體行動(dòng)旨在共同為中國開發(fā)者爭(zhēng)取公平交易條件。
Apple referred back to the company’s comment on the original complaint: “The App Store has published guidelines that apply equally to all developers in every country where we operate, and we comply with local laws and regulations,” Apple said, adding that it worked hard to ensure its developers were successful.
蘋果公司再一次擺出其在最初遭舉報(bào)時(shí)的回應(yīng)：“在每一個(gè)App Store參與運(yùn)營的國家或地區(qū)，App Store發(fā)布的指南對(duì)所有開發(fā)者一視同仁，并且我們遵守當(dāng)?shù)氐姆煞ㄒ?guī)。”蘋果還補(bǔ)充道，蘋果竭力幫助開發(fā)者在 應(yīng)用商店獲得成功。
China is the most important market for Apple’s App Store in terms of revenue, according to market research firm IDC.
市場(chǎng)研究公司IDC表示，以收入計(jì)，中國是蘋果應(yīng)用商店最重要的市場(chǎng)。
Both Beijing-based Dare & Sure and Chengdu-based Sichuan Fa Ye Law Firm alleged Apple was abusing its control of the iOS App Store, the only official source of app downloads for iPhones, by removing apps without good reason. Developers in China said they often did not receive warning before the deletions happened, and could not get a helpful response from the company explaining the decision.
北京達(dá)曉律師事務(wù)所和四川法也律師事務(wù)所都指控蘋果濫用其對(duì)iPhone應(yīng)用下載唯一官方渠道iOS 應(yīng)用商店的控制權(quán)，在沒有充分理由的情況下將應(yīng)用下架。中國應(yīng)用程序開發(fā)商表示，在他們的應(yīng)用被下架之前他們往往沒有收到任何警告，也無法從蘋果那里獲得解釋下架決定的有用回應(yīng)。
“When companies that are important to Apple allege that certain apps infringe their rights and should be taken down, Apple will do so with very little evidence or even no evidence,” wrote law firm Dare & Sure.
北京達(dá)曉律師事務(wù)所表示，當(dāng)對(duì)蘋果很重要的公司聲稱某些應(yīng)用侵犯了它們的權(quán)利，應(yīng)該被下架，即使證據(jù)很少甚至沒有證據(jù)，蘋果也會(huì)下架這些應(yīng)用。
“Some Apple developers have a monopoly on power and can do whatever they like, they can get any app taken down if they want to,” said Gu Cheng, a freelance developer.
“一些開發(fā)蘋果應(yīng)用的開發(fā)商有壟斷性的權(quán)力，它們可以為所欲為，只要它們?cè)敢?，它們可以讓任何?yīng)用下架，”自由開發(fā)者顧誠(音譯)說。
Many developers said apps that may seem like copies of others would often be for different audiences or regions, and that they did not understand how Apple decided which apps were the originals.
許多開發(fā)者表示，很多看起來像是模仿其他應(yīng)用的應(yīng)用有可能是為不同受眾或者不同地區(qū)開發(fā)的，他們不明白蘋果是如何判斷哪些應(yīng)用是原版的。
