男同胞們趕緊鍛煉吧：體格強(qiáng)健的男性更具領(lǐng)導(dǎo)才能

　　Men with muscly physiques are perceived as possessingstronger leadership skills than their skinnier colleagues， a newstudy shows。

　　最新研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，有著強(qiáng)健體格的男性被認(rèn)為比體型清瘦的同事更具領(lǐng)導(dǎo)才能。

　　While intelligence and level-headedness might seem moreimportant for people wishing to exude management potential，researchers at UC Berkeley‘s Haas School of Business identified an overwhelming connectionbetween physical prowess and high status。

　　盡管有意發(fā)揮自己管理潛質(zhì)的人更看重智慧與冷靜這些因素，加州伯克利分校哈斯商學(xué)院(微博)的研究人員卻發(fā)現(xiàn)，強(qiáng)健體魄與位居高位的關(guān)系十分緊密。

　　For the published study， titled ‘The role of physical formidability in human social statusallocation’， a selection of men underwent strength tests before being photographed。Volunteers were then shown and told they were looking at candidates newly hired by aconsultancy firm。

　　以“強(qiáng)健體魄在人類(lèi)社會(huì)地位分配中的作用”為題發(fā)表的一項(xiàng)研究挑選出了一組男性，并對(duì)他們進(jìn)行了體力測(cè)試，然后為他們拍攝了照片。之后，讓志愿者看了這些照片，并告訴他們，照片上的人是一家咨詢(xún)機(jī)構(gòu)最新聘用的人員。

　　Next they were asked to rate each man based on how much they admired him， held him in highesteem， how much they could imagine his career progressing， and how he might respond toothers in his company。

　　志愿者得依據(jù)對(duì)他們的仰慕程度、對(duì)他們職業(yè)發(fā)展以及如何應(yīng)對(duì)同事的預(yù)期來(lái)評(píng)價(jià)這些人。

　　“The physically strong men in the pictures were given higher status because they are perceived asleaders，” said Professor Cameron Anderson， who led the study with Professor AaronLukaszewski。 “Our findings are consistent with a lot of real examples of strong men in positionsof power。”

　　卡梅倫·安德森教授與亞倫·盧卡謝夫斯基教授是這項(xiàng)研究的帶頭人。卡梅倫·安德森教授指出：“志愿者把圖片中有著強(qiáng)健體魄的男性視為是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者，所以這些男性獲得的地位更高。真實(shí)生活中，有許多體型健壯的男性成為領(lǐng)袖人物的例子，這與我們的發(fā)現(xiàn)相符。

　　To ensure that men weren‘t being chosen based on good looks， the volunteers - roughly a50/50 split between men and women - were also asked to rate each candidate’s “overallattractiveness”。 The men photographed were also each dressed in identical plain white tank topsso that clothing choice did not influence results。

　　為了確保先前的評(píng)價(jià)不是基于出色的相貌，志愿者(男女比例大約各占一半)還被要求評(píng)價(jià)這些人的“整體吸引力”。照片上的男性都穿著相同的白色背心，以防衣著影響實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)果。

　　After that initial experiment， researchers used Photoshop to switch the heads on each body。 Inthis round， volunteers again favoured stronger bodies – even if they were attached to a ‘weak’face。

　　第一輪實(shí)驗(yàn)過(guò)后，研究人員利用Photoshop把不同照片的頭部與身體做了調(diào)換。這次，盡管志愿者心儀的是那些“柔弱”的面孔，但在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力方面，體格強(qiáng)健的人依然是他們的優(yōu)先選擇。

　　It may be assumed that any connection between bodily strength and leadership is a consequenceof intimidating weaker colleagues with over-the-top， macho acts of masculinity， but theopposite may in fact be true。

　　人們也許會(huì)想當(dāng)然地認(rèn)為體魄和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力之間產(chǎn)生聯(lián)系是因?yàn)榇髩K頭的強(qiáng)壯威猛對(duì)那些相對(duì)文弱的同事起到了震懾作用，然而事實(shí)卻正好相反。

　　“Strong men who were perceived as being likely to behave aggressively toward other groupmembers were actually granted less status than their apparently gentler counterparts，”Lukaszewski says。

　　盧卡謝夫斯基說(shuō)：“人們?nèi)绻J(rèn)為一位體魄強(qiáng)健的男性可能在其他組員前表現(xiàn)得咄咄逼人，那么給他的地位就會(huì)低于與他同樣健壯但更加溫和的同事。

　　“Together， the results suggest that the conferral of status upon formidable men， perhapscounter-intuitively， serves a fundamentally pro-social function – to enhance the effectiveness ofcooperation within the group。”

　　他還補(bǔ)充道：“總之，結(jié)果顯示，強(qiáng)健的男性被賦予領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的角色，或許與直覺(jué)相悖，但這能提高團(tuán)隊(duì)合作的效率，從根本上是有利于社會(huì)的。”

　　Berkeley‘s results， which are only applicable to men (no link was found between femaleleadership and physical strength)， are in part reflected on the political stage。

　　某種程度上，伯克利分校的研究結(jié)果在政治舞臺(tái)上得到了反映，但這個(gè)結(jié)果僅代表了男性群體(還沒(méi)有研究發(fā)現(xiàn)女性的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力與體格相關(guān))。

　　Russian president Vladimir Putin would certainly see his strapping figure as an example of thefindings – though with height a factor， his case is weakened by being only 5ft 7in。 BarackObama， meanwhile， who keeps his 6ft 2in frame lean with regular basketball， may be a moreconvincing case study。

　　俄羅斯總統(tǒng)弗拉基米爾·普金肯定會(huì)贊同他健壯的身材就是證明這些發(fā)現(xiàn)的一個(gè)例子——但如果從身高看的話(huà)，他的信服力略遜一籌，普金身高僅170.18厘米。貝拉克·奧巴馬的例子可能更有說(shuō)服力。他身高187.96厘米，經(jīng)常打籃球使他體格勻稱(chēng)。

　　Not all is lost for diminutive， physically feeble leaders， however。 While the gym may boostone‘s chances of being seen as capable， Professor Cameron insists it isn’t the only thing。

　　但體格瘦弱的人也不是無(wú)望成為領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者。卡梅倫教授強(qiáng)調(diào)說(shuō)，雖然健身可以增加一個(gè)人被視作有領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力的幾率，但健身不是唯一的出路。

　　“If you‘re behaving in ways that demonstrate you are a leader or are not a leader， strengthdoesn’t matter，” he says。

　　他接著說(shuō)：“如果你表現(xiàn)得像個(gè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者，是否有強(qiáng)健的體魄無(wú)關(guān)緊要。而反之，有再好的體魄也無(wú)濟(jì)于事。”