英語(yǔ)聽(tīng)力 學(xué)英語(yǔ),練聽(tīng)力,上聽(tīng)力課堂! 注冊(cè) 登錄
> 在線聽(tīng)力 > 有聲讀物 > 世界名著 > 譯林版·如何享受人生,享受工作 >  第15篇

雙語(yǔ)《如何享受人生,享受工作》 第十五章 蘇格拉底的秘密

所屬教程:譯林版·如何享受人生,享受工作

瀏覽:

2022年06月29日

手機(jī)版
掃描二維碼方便學(xué)習(xí)和分享

Chapter 15 The Secret of Socrates

In talking with people, don't begin by discussing the things on which you differ. Begin by emphasizing—and keep on emphasizing—the things on which you agree. Keep emphasizing, if possible, that you are both striving for the same end and that your only difference is one of method and not of purpose.

Get the other person saying“Yes, yes”at the outset. Keep your opponent, if possible, from saying“No.”

A“No”response, according to Professor Overstreet,(1) is a most difficult handicap to overcome. When you have said“No,”all your pride of personality demands that you remain consistent with yourself. You may later feel that the“No”was ill-advised; nevertheless, there is your precious pride to consider! Once having said a thing, you feel you must stick to it. Hence it is of the very greatest importance that a person be started in the affirmative direction.

The skillful speaker gets, at the outset, a number of“Yes”responses. This sets the psychological process of the listeners moving in the affirmative direction. It is like the movement of a billiard ball. Propel in one direction, and it takes some force to deflect it; far more force to send it back in the opposite direction.

The psychological patterns here are quite clear. When a person says“No”and really means it, he or she is doing far more than saying a word of two letters. The entire organism—glandular, nervous, muscular—gathers itself together into a condition of rejection. There is, usually in minute but sometimes in observable degree, a physical withdrawal or readiness for withdrawal. The whole neuromuscular system, in short, sets itself on guard against acceptance. When, to the contrary, a person says“Yes,”none of the withdrawal activities takes place. The organism is in a forward— moving, accepting, open attitude. Hence the more“Yeses”we can, at the very outset, induce, the more likely we are to succeed in capturing the attention for our ultimate proposal.

It is a very simple technique—this yes response. And yet, how much it is neglected! It often seems as if people get a sense of their own importance by antagonizing others at the outset.

Get a student to say“No”at the beginning, or a customer, child, husband, or wife, and it takes the wisdom and the patience of angels to transform that bristling negative into an affirmative.

The use of this“yes, yes”technique enabled James Eberson, who was a teller in the Greenwich Savings Bank, in New York City, to secure a prospective customer who might otherwise have been lost.

“This man came in to open an account,”said Mr. Eberson,“and I gave him our usual form to fill out. Some of the questions he answered willingly, but there were others he flatly refused to answer.

“Before I began the study of human relations, I would have told this prospective depositor that if he refused to give the bank this information, we should have to refuse to accept this account. I am ashamed that I have been guilty of doing that very thing in the past. Naturally, an ultimatum like that made me feel good. I had shown who was boss, that the bank's rules and regulations couldn't be flouted. But that sort of attitude certainly didn't give a feeling of welcome and importance to the man who had walked in to give us his patronage.

“I resolved this morning to use a little horse sense. I resolved not to talk about what the bank wanted but about what the customer wanted. And above all else, I was determined to get him saying‘yes, yes’from the very start. So I agreed with him. I told him the information he refused to give was not absolutely necessary.

“‘However,’I said,‘suppose you have money in this bank at your death. Wouldn't you like to have the bank transfer it to your next of kin, who is entitled to it according to law?’

“‘Yes, of course,’he replied.

“‘Don't you think,’I continued,‘that it would be a good idea to give us the name of your next of kin so that, in the event of your death, we could carry out your wishes without error or delay?’

“Again he said,‘Yes.’

“The young man's attitude softened and changed when he realized that we weren't asking for this information for our sake but for his sake. Before leaving the bank, this young man not only gave me complete information about himself but he opened, at my suggestion, a trust account, naming his mother as the beneficiary for his account, and he had gladly answered all the questions concerning his mother also.

“I found that by getting him to say‘yes, yes’from the outset, he forgot the issue at stake and was happy to do all the things I suggested.”

Joseph Allison, a sales representative for Westinghouse Electric Company, had this story to tell:“There was a man in my territory that our company was most eager to sell to. My predecessor had called on him for ten years without selling anything. When I took over the territory, I called steadily for three years without getting an order. Finally, after thirteen years of calls and sales talk, we sold him a few motors. If these proved to be all right, an order for several hundred more would follow. Such was my expectation.

“Right? I knew they would be all right. So when I called three weeks later, I was in high spirits.

“The chief engineer greeted me with this shocking announcement:‘Allison, I can't buy the remainder of the motors from you.’

“‘Why?’I asked in amazement.‘Why?’

“‘Because your motors are too hot. I can't put my hand on them.’

“I knew it wouldn't do any good to argue. I had tried that sort of thing too long. So I thought of getting the‘yes, yes’response.“‘Well, now look, Mr. Smith,’I said.‘I agree with you a hundred percent; if those motors are running too hot, you ought not to buy any more of them. You must have motors that won't run any hotter than standards set by the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. Isn't that so?’

“He agreed it was. I had gotten my first‘yes.’

“‘The Electrical Manufacturers Association regulations say that a properly designed motor may have a temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit above room temperature. Is that correct?’

“‘yes,’he agreed.‘That's quite correct. But your motors are much hotter.’

“I didn't argue with him. I merely asked:‘How hot is the mill room?’

“‘Oh,’he said,‘a(chǎn)bout 75 degrees Fahrenheit.’

“‘Well,’I replied,‘if the mill room is 75 degrees and you add 72 to that, that makes a total of 147 degrees Fahrenheit. Wouldn't you scald your hand if you held it under a spigot of hot water at a temperature of 147 degrees Fahrenheit?’

“Again he had to say‘yes’.

“‘Well,’I suggested,‘wouldn't it be a good idea to keep your hands off those motors?

“‘Well, I guess you're right,’he admitted. We continued to chat for a while. Then he called his secretary and lined up approximately $35,000 worth of business for the ensuing month.

“It took me years and cost me countless thousands of dollars in lost business before I finally learned that it doesn't pay to argue, that it is much more profitable and much more interesting to look at things from the other person's viewpoint and try to get that person saying‘yes, yes.’”

Eddie Snow, who sponsors our courses in Oakland, California, tells how he became a good customer of a shop because the proprietor got him to say“yes, yes.”Eddie had become interested in bow hunting and had spent considerable money in purchasing equipment and supplies from a local bow store. When his brother was visiting him he wanted to rent a bow for him from this store. The sales clerk told him they didn't rent bows, so Eddie phoned another bow store. Eddie described what happened:

“A very pleasant gentleman answered the phone. His response to my question for a rental was completely different from the other place. He said he was sorry but they no longer rented bows because they couldn't afford to do so. He then asked me if I had rented before. I replied,‘Yes, several years ago.’He reminded me that I probably paid $25 to $30 for the rental. I said‘yes’again. He then asked if I was the kind of person who liked to save money. Naturally, I answered‘yes.’He went on to explain that they had bow sets with all the necessary equipment on sale for $34.95. I could buy a complete set for only $4.95 more than I could rent one. He explained that is why they had discontinued renting them. Did I think that was reasonable? My‘yes’response led to a purchase of the set, and when I picked it up I purchased several more items at this shop and have since become a regular customer.”

Socrates,“the gadfly of Athens,”was one of the greatest philosophers the world has ever known. He did something that only a handful of men in all history have been able to do: he sharply changed the whole course of human thought; and now, twenty-four centuries after his death, he is honored as one of the wisest persuaders who ever influenced this wrangling world.

His method? Did he tell people they were wrong? Oh, no, not Socrates. He was far too adroit for that. His whole technique, now called the“Socratic method,”was based upon getting a“yes, yes”response. He asked questions with which his opponent would have to agree. He kept on winning one admission after another until he had an armful of yeses. He kept on asking questions until finally, almost without realizing it, his opponents found themselves embracing a conclusion they would have bitterly denied a few minutes previously.

The next time we are tempted to tell someone he or she is wrong, let's remember old Socrates and ask a gentle question—a question that will get the“yes, yes”response.

The Chinese have a proverb pregnant with the ageold wisdom of the Orient:“He who treads softly goes far.”

They have spent five thousand years studying human nature, those cultured Chinese, and they have garnered a lot of perspicacity:“He who treads softly goes far.”

GET THE OTHER PERSON SAYING“YES, YES”IMMEDIATELY.

————————————————————

(1) Harry A. Overstreet, Influencing Human Behavior New York: Norton. 1925.

第十五章 蘇格拉底的秘密

和別人對(duì)話時(shí),不要一開(kāi)始就討論存在異議的事。要先從雙方意見(jiàn)一致的事開(kāi)始討論,別忘了不停地強(qiáng)調(diào)你們的共同點(diǎn)。如果可以的話,要一直強(qiáng)調(diào)你們的最終目標(biāo)是一樣的,唯一的不同只是達(dá)成目標(biāo)的方式。

讓對(duì)方從一開(kāi)始就對(duì)你說(shuō)“沒(méi)錯(cuò)”而不是“不對(duì)”。

哈里·奧沃思特利特教授說(shuō):“一個(gè)否定的回應(yīng)是最難逾越的障礙。當(dāng)你說(shuō)了‘不’以后,你的自尊心會(huì)要求你始終保持一致?;蛟S后來(lái)你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)不該說(shuō)‘不’,但是你會(huì)顧慮到寶貴的自尊心!說(shuō)了一句話以后,你就會(huì)想要貫徹到底。因此,在肯定中開(kāi)始是至關(guān)重要的?!?1)

游刃有余的交談?wù)邚囊婚_(kāi)始就會(huì)得到好幾個(gè)“是”的回應(yīng),這便把聽(tīng)者帶入了一系列肯定式的心理過(guò)程中。這就像臺(tái)球一樣,當(dāng)你把球推向一個(gè)方向時(shí),若想使球旋轉(zhuǎn)則要多發(fā)些力,若想使球往反方向反彈則需要大很多的力氣。

這里的心理規(guī)律很顯著。當(dāng)對(duì)方認(rèn)真地說(shuō)“不”時(shí),他說(shuō)的遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)不止這一個(gè)字。這時(shí),他的腺體、神經(jīng)和肌肉都進(jìn)入了反對(duì)的狀態(tài)。通常會(huì)有微小的,但有時(shí)也很明顯的身體上的退縮或準(zhǔn)備退縮的狀態(tài)。簡(jiǎn)而言之,整個(gè)肌肉神經(jīng)系統(tǒng)都進(jìn)入了自我保護(hù)機(jī)制,拒絕接受任何事情。然而當(dāng)人們說(shuō)“是”時(shí),這些退縮活動(dòng)都不會(huì)出現(xiàn),整個(gè)機(jī)制是積極向前的、接納和開(kāi)放的狀態(tài)。因此,如果我們一開(kāi)始得到的肯定回應(yīng)越多,就越有可能成功推廣我們的提議。

讓人們給予肯定的回應(yīng)其實(shí)只是一個(gè)很簡(jiǎn)單的技巧,然而人們卻往往忽視了它!人們仿佛總是一開(kāi)始就用與他人對(duì)抗的方式為自己尋找重要感。

如果學(xué)生、顧客、孩子、丈夫或妻子從一開(kāi)始就說(shuō)了“不”,那么我們便需要天使的智慧與耐心才能把這布滿荊棘的反對(duì)意見(jiàn)轉(zhuǎn)化成肯定。

紐約市格林威治儲(chǔ)蓄銀行的出納詹姆斯·艾伯森正是運(yùn)用了“讓他人說(shuō)是”這個(gè)方法挽回了差點(diǎn)流失的一位客戶。

艾伯森先生說(shuō):“一個(gè)人來(lái)開(kāi)戶,我遞給他一份常規(guī)的申請(qǐng)表。他欣然回答了幾個(gè)問(wèn)題,對(duì)表格上的其他問(wèn)題卻拒絕回答。

“在學(xué)習(xí)這堂人際關(guān)系課之前,我會(huì)這樣告訴他,如果他拒絕向銀行提供信息,我們一定會(huì)拒絕他的申請(qǐng)。我對(duì)自己以往的行為感到愧疚,能夠給人下最終審判自然是有快感的事。我強(qiáng)調(diào)了我們的制度,而且銀行也不能亂了規(guī)矩。但是那樣的態(tài)度肯定不會(huì)讓來(lái)存錢的客戶覺(jué)得受歡迎、受重視。

“今天早晨我決定運(yùn)用常識(shí),一開(kāi)始先不說(shuō)銀行的需要,而是要詢問(wèn)客戶的需求。最重要的是,我希望從一開(kāi)始就把他帶入說(shuō)‘是’的狀態(tài)。所以我同意了他的做法,告訴他他拒絕提供的信息并不是必需的?!?/p>

“我又對(duì)他說(shuō):‘但是假設(shè)您去世時(shí)賬戶里還有錢,難道您不希望銀行能依法幫您把它轉(zhuǎn)到您所授權(quán)的最親近的人那里嗎?’

“‘當(dāng)然希望啦?!卮稹?/p>

“我又繼續(xù)問(wèn)道:‘那么,難道您不愿意提供這個(gè)人的姓名,好讓我們?cè)谝馔馇闆r發(fā)生時(shí)能順利把錢轉(zhuǎn)給此人嗎?’

“他再次回答了:‘當(dāng)然愿意呀?!?/p>

“這位年輕人的態(tài)度逐漸平和下來(lái)了,當(dāng)他意識(shí)到銀行要求填寫的信息并非是出于銀行的利益時(shí),他的觀點(diǎn)發(fā)生了變化。這位年輕人離開(kāi)銀行時(shí),不但給了我他的全部信息,還在我的建議下開(kāi)了一個(gè)信托賬號(hào),指定他的母親為受益人,也填寫了有關(guān)他母親的一切資料。

“我發(fā)現(xiàn)如果一開(kāi)始就引領(lǐng)他進(jìn)入肯定的思維模式中,這樣他便會(huì)忘了之前為何要堅(jiān)持以及在堅(jiān)持什么,并愉快地做了一切我建議他做的事?!?/p>

西屋電氣公司的一名銷售代表約瑟夫·埃里森給我們講了這樣一個(gè)故事:“公司很希望當(dāng)?shù)氐囊粋€(gè)商人能成為他們的顧客,但我的前輩們已經(jīng)向他電話推銷了十年,也未能賣出去任何東西。我接管這個(gè)領(lǐng)域后也定期打電話向他推銷,在長(zhǎng)達(dá)三年的時(shí)間里,也毫無(wú)結(jié)果。在這十三年的電話交談和商品推銷后,我們終于成功地賣了幾個(gè)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)給他。如果這些發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)能夠正常運(yùn)行的話,他將會(huì)訂購(gòu)幾百臺(tái)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),這是我的理解。

“我知道這幾個(gè)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)不會(huì)有問(wèn)題,所以當(dāng)我三周后向他致電時(shí),我是興高采烈的。

“總工程師平靜地向我們宣布了一個(gè)令人震驚的消息:‘埃里森,我們不能買更多的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)?!?/p>

“‘為什么?’我震驚地問(wèn),‘究竟為什么?’

“‘因?yàn)槟銈兊陌l(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)散熱不好,我都無(wú)法把手放在發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)上?!?/p>

“我知道爭(zhēng)執(zhí)無(wú)濟(jì)于事,我之前曾經(jīng)有過(guò)太多慘痛的教訓(xùn),所以我想起了‘讓對(duì)方說(shuō)是’的方式。

“‘史密斯先生,你看,’我說(shuō),‘我完全同意。如果那些發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)過(guò)熱你的確不該買。你肯定見(jiàn)過(guò)比國(guó)家電器制造商協(xié)會(huì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)熱度要低的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),對(duì)不對(duì)?’

“他說(shuō)是的。這是我得到的第一個(gè)‘是’。

“‘國(guó)家電器制造商協(xié)會(huì)要求設(shè)計(jì)合理的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)熱度只可比室內(nèi)溫度高72華氏度。是不是?’

“‘沒(méi)錯(cuò)?!卮?,‘非常正確。但是你們的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)超過(guò)了那個(gè)溫度?!?/p>

“我沒(méi)有和他爭(zhēng)執(zhí),只是問(wèn)他:‘工廠里面的溫度是多少?’

“‘哦,’他說(shuō),‘大概75華氏度?!?/p>

“我回應(yīng)道:‘那么如果室內(nèi)75華氏度,再加72度,那就是147度。如果你把手放在147度的流水下會(huì)燙傷的吧?’

“他再次給出肯定的答復(fù)。

“于是我說(shuō):‘這樣的話是不是本來(lái)也不該用手去碰發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)呢?’

“‘嗯,我猜你是對(duì)的?!姓J(rèn)道。我們又聊了一會(huì)兒,后來(lái)他就讓秘書(shū)訂了價(jià)值三萬(wàn)五千美金的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),這相當(dāng)于接下來(lái)一整個(gè)月的營(yíng)業(yè)額。

“浪費(fèi)了多年時(shí)間,損失了上萬(wàn)美金后,我才懂得了爭(zhēng)執(zhí)無(wú)用的道理。用他人的立場(chǎng)思考問(wèn)題并能讓對(duì)方說(shuō)‘是的’‘是的’才是最有利也是最有趣的方式?!?/p>

贊助了我們加州奧克蘭培訓(xùn)班的艾迪·斯諾給我們講述了他是如何因?yàn)榈曛鞫米屗f(shuō)“是”而成了店里的一名忠誠(chéng)顧客的。艾迪喜歡用弓箭打獵,并花了很多錢在當(dāng)?shù)匾婚g店鋪里購(gòu)置設(shè)備。當(dāng)他的哥哥來(lái)看他時(shí),他想從這家店里租一把弓,但銷售人員說(shuō)他們不外租,所以艾迪給另一家店打電話講述了事情的經(jīng)過(guò):

“一位非常和藹可親的人接了電話,他給我的回答和另一家店完全不同。他說(shuō)他很抱歉,他們停止了租弓箭的業(yè)務(wù),因?yàn)樗麄冐?fù)擔(dān)不起了。之后他問(wèn)我以前是否租過(guò),我說(shuō):‘是的,幾年前租過(guò)?!聹y(cè)我那時(shí)應(yīng)該付了25—30美金租金,我再次說(shuō)‘沒(méi)錯(cuò)’。后來(lái)他問(wèn)我,我是否是喜歡省錢的人,我自然給予了肯定的回答。對(duì)方繼續(xù)說(shuō)道他們有一套弓箭正在促銷,包含了所有必需的設(shè)備,一共34.95美金,僅需比租器材多花4.95美金就能買下這一套器材。他最后解釋道,這就是他們停止出租器材的原因。我認(rèn)為他的話合理嗎?我的肯定回答使我買下了那一套器材。我去取貨時(shí)還順便在那家店里買了其他幾樣?xùn)|西,后來(lái)慢慢地成了他們的????!?/p>

自喻為“希臘的牛虻”的蘇格拉底是世上最偉大的哲學(xué)家之一。他做了有史以來(lái)只有少數(shù)人做到的事:他大大地改變了別人的思維方式。在他辭世兩千四百年后的今天,他被奉為影響辯證體系的最具智慧的辯者。

他到底用了怎樣的方式呢?他告訴別人“你是錯(cuò)的”了嗎?哦,不,蘇格拉底不會(huì)做如此不精明的事。他的辯證方法被稱作“蘇格拉底法”,而這方法就是基于讓對(duì)方說(shuō)“是”。他向?qū)Ψ教岢鲆幌盗惺箤?duì)方不得不說(shuō)“是”的問(wèn)題。他在一個(gè)又一個(gè)的問(wèn)題上得到肯定的答復(fù),最后得到一籮筐的“是”。他會(huì)繼續(xù)提問(wèn)下去,直到最后對(duì)手在不經(jīng)意間發(fā)現(xiàn)自己居然擁護(hù)著幾分鐘前還尖銳反駁的結(jié)論。

今后當(dāng)我們想告訴對(duì)方“你是錯(cuò)的”時(shí),讓我們記住蘇格拉底的做法,提一些溫和的問(wèn)題,能得到對(duì)方肯定答復(fù)的問(wèn)題。

中國(guó)有句諺語(yǔ),蘊(yùn)含著東方的古老智慧:“輕履者行遠(yuǎn)?!?/p>

中國(guó)人用了五千年的時(shí)間揣摩人性、學(xué)習(xí)智者的思想,終于獲得了敏銳的洞察力:“輕履者行遠(yuǎn)?!?/p>

立刻獲取對(duì)方的贊同。

————————————————————

(1) 哈里·A.奧沃思特利特,《人類行為》(紐約:諾頓出版社,1925)。

用戶搜索

瘋狂英語(yǔ) 英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)法 新概念英語(yǔ) 走遍美國(guó) 四級(jí)聽(tīng)力 英語(yǔ)音標(biāo) 英語(yǔ)入門 發(fā)音 美語(yǔ) 四級(jí) 新東方 七年級(jí) 賴世雄 zero是什么意思杭州市華方新村英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)交流群

  • 頻道推薦
  • |
  • 全站推薦
  • 推薦下載
  • 網(wǎng)站推薦