金融時報:我們?yōu)楹味ぷ鳎?/h1>

所屬教程:金融時報原文閱讀

瀏覽:

2022年01月15日

手機(jī)版

掃描二維碼方便學(xué)習(xí)和分享

我們?yōu)楹味ぷ鳎?/h3>

總有人告訴歐美的孩子，“勤奮的中國和韓國孩子未來會跟我們搶飯吃”，他們塑造了工作狂似的亞洲文化的兇殘形象。然而，這也許只是個幻覺，勤奮工作其實并非“亞洲文化”，它背后的經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會因素才是更值得注意的。

測試中可能遇到的詞匯和知識：

bogeyman ['b??g?mæn] 可怕的人物，妖怪

Amy Chua 虎媽蔡美兒

hagwon 韓國的補(bǔ)習(xí)學(xué)校，以高強(qiáng)度著稱

crammer ['kræm?] 為應(yīng)試而死記硬背的人

lyceum[lai'si?m, 'laisi?m] 學(xué)會；文化團(tuán)體

Saigon [sai'ɡ?n; 'saiɡ?n] 西貢，今天的越南胡志明市

libertine ['l?b?ti?n; -t?n; -ta?n] 放蕩的，浪蕩的人

aromatherapy [?r??m?'θer?p?] 香薰治療

What are we working for?（862 words）

By Simon Kuper

There's always some foreign bogeyman out to get Americans, and today that bogeyman is an Asian child. Hard-working Asian kids will “eat our lunch”, predicts Thomas Friedman, the pundit who exists to articulate mainstream American anxieties. Last year's Pisa(Programme For International Student Assessment, an international programme assesing students across the world) test scores, which showed Asian kids extending their lead over western children, helped spread this particular anxiety across the west. Now the new book The Triple Package by Amy Chua and Jed Rubenfeld (interviewed last week in this magazine) depicts Asians and other immigrants outworking regular Americans.

The growing consensus: we feckless westerners need to become like South Korean kids, swotting in the hagwon crammer till midnight. Thankfully, it's not true. We don't need to work harder. Instead, westerners will continue our trend of working less, and Asians are already starting to follow us.

Working hard isn't some ancient “Asian value”. Westerners used to work hard, too. Factory workers in the industrial revolution put in Korean-style seven-day weeks. The French only got paid holidays in 1936. Many European schools used to be as tough as any hagwon. Frank Wedekind's 1891 German play Spring Awakening describes a school full of beaten-down pupils not totally unlike the European lyceum I attended in the 1980s. For generations until Saigon fell in 1975, “west” viewed “east” as “indolent, decadent, pleasure-loving, passive”, writes Ian Buruma in The Missionary and the Libertine.

Today's Chinese and Koreans work hard not because of Asian values. Rather, people tend to work hard when they are poor and then suddenly enter a system that lets them get richer through hard work. That's what happened in postwar Germany and Japan, in Korea after its war, in China after Mao, and to countless immigrants in the US. However, once people have some money, they want to chill. In the typical immigrant trajectory, the first generation runs a corner shop, the second generation is a dentist and the third works part-time in an aromatherapy shop in Santa Fe. As Chua and Rubenfeld say: “Group success in America often tends to dissipate after two generations.”

Asians in Asia are starting to chill, too. Having become middle class, they are getting fed up with overwork. South Korean students topped the Pisa test rankings but ranked bottom in the developed world for happiness at school. Korean education minister Seo Nam-soo told the BBC: “I think no other country has achieved such rapid growth within a half century as Korea. And naturally, due to that, we emphasised achievement within schools and in society, so that students and adults were under a lot of stress, and that led to high suicide rates … Our goals now are about how to make our people happier.” Nowadays, Korea's government closes hagwons at 10pm, and shuts schools and workplaces on Saturdays. China and Thailand are limiting homework too. Thai teachers who overburden pupils can be reported.

Japan, the west's lunch-eating bogeyman of the 1980s, has already slackened off. Working hours have dropped after 20 years of economic stagnation plus government regulation. The country may now be happier than in its boom years. In Bending Adversity , my colleague David Pilling's new book on Japan, the young Japanese Yoshi Ishikawa says: “Our fathers didn't look so happy to us. They worked such long hours. They earned money, but families in those days led separate lives. Maybe we are asking ourselves, ‘What are we working for?'”

That's the question facing everyone who has enough to live on – as ever more people do, despite the economic crisis. If Obamacare succeeds, all developed countries will have guaranteed healthcare. Life then ceases to be a battle for survival. Extreme capitalists may regret this but it's a fact that has consequences for working hours. Jonathan Portes, director of the UK's National Institute for Economic and Social Research, says that as technology improves, “you could argue that if working hours don't go down, there's something wrong”. People will choose more leisure.

One other factor should keep cutting working hours in developed countries: shared childcare. Both men and women now want to combine work with raising kids. That means nobody can stay in the office all hours any more. Facebook's COO Sheryl Sandberg urges women to “lean in” at work. But my generation of fathers is increasingly “leaning out”: not shooting for top jobs because those would mean never being home for bath time. Indeed, Sandberg herself quotes a Pew Research survey from 2012, which found that among Americans aged 18 to 34, fewer men (59 per cent) than women (66 per cent) said “success in a high-paying career or profession” was important to their lives.

Westerners who choose to spend life in the office will become a shrinking self-selected group. The uproar after a Bank of America intern died in London last year, possibly from overwork, reflects the widespread desire to find bankers guilty of murder. But it also reflects growing aversion to workaholism.

Strivers such as Friedman, Chua and Sandberg like to see everyone striving. But societies in west and east are now seeking something else: that awkward balance between office, home and messing around on YouTube.

請根據(jù)你所讀到的文章內(nèi)容，完成以下自測題目：

1.Which of the following is not a force driving down working hours in the developed world?

A.The industrial revolution.

B.The growing middle class.

C.Economic stagnation.

D.Paid holidays.

答案(1)

2.Generally speaking, when do people work hard?

A.When they are poor.

B.When hard work suddenly means getting rich.

C.In post-war times.

D.Before the emergence of “welfare state”.

答案(2)

3.The writer discusses so much about S.Korea mainly because?

A.Korean students topped the Pisa test rankings.

B.Korean shows that overwork may go against people's happiness.

C.Korean government is restraining hagwons and schools.

D.Korean immigrants in the West are well-know workaholics.

答案(3)

4.What point does the writer try to make by mentioning Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg?

A.That it is common for women to pursue successful careers today.

B.That shared childcare contributes to her success.

C.That Sandberg serves as a powerful role model for the children.

D.That she does not represent the genaral social trend.

答案(4)

* * *

(1)答案：A.The industrial revolution.

解釋：BCD都是正確的，A并不準(zhǔn)確，因為工業(yè)革命的開始也就是人們超長時間工作的開始。廣大“無產(chǎn)階級”經(jīng)過幾代人逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹挟a(chǎn)階級才使得“工作-生活平衡”逐漸流行。C在文中尤指日本，D尤指法國。

(2)答案：B.When hard work suddenly means getting rich.

解釋：這一總結(jié)出現(xiàn)在第五段，說這是“當(dāng)人們窮但突然進(jìn)入了一個努力工作可以致富的制度中”，緊接著作者舉了一些例子：戰(zhàn)后的德、日、韓，毛之后的中國，以及剛到美國的移民。

(3)答案：B.Korean shows that overwork may go against people's happiness.

解釋：作者在A這句話之后緊接著寫道，but ranked bottom in the developed world for happiness at school. But后面的才是重點。CD都不錯，但是結(jié)合全文來看，作者是在批判那些鼓吹工作狂精神的人，這里提供了論據(jù)：瘋狂工作的副作用大。順便提一句，workaholic一詞在中國和韓國文化中的褒義色彩比在西方要濃厚的多。

(4)答案：D.That she does not represent the genaral social trend.

解釋：在最后一段，作者說，虎媽蔡美爾和桑德伯格這些人希望讓人們努力工作，但社會的大趨勢卻是更加追求“工作、生活、娛樂的平衡”，不管在東方還是西方都是這樣。